Fill in order details

  • Submit your instructions
    to writers for free!

Chat with the writer

  • Chat with preferred expert writers
  • Request a preview of your paper
    from them for free

Editing

  • Project edited by the quality evaluation department

Download Your Completed Project

  • Download the completed project from your account or have it sent to your email address

Abstract (10% of paper grade, approximately 1 page – single space is acceptable ) Clearly and concisely identify purpose (to include issue and brief significance), process (PET Model), and outcome (decision made with brief rationale) in a 1 page with headings for each section (Should appear on a page of its own following the title page).

EBP Final Paper

Guidelines for Paper:

Apply the following steps of the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based PET Model for the paper

  • Abstract (10% of paper grade, approximately 1 page – single space is acceptable )
    • Clearly and concisely identify purpose (to include issue and brief significance), process (PET Model), and outcome (decision made with brief rationale) in a 1 page with headings for each section (Should appear on a page of its own following the title page).
    • Be sure to review the Guidelines and Grading Rubric below before and throughout creation of your abstract.
  • Introduction/Practice Question (10% of paper grade, approximately 1 page)
    • Define the problem
    • Discuss the significance of the problem
    • Describe the purpose of the paper
    • Identify the specific practice issue to be addressed, include setting & population (using PICO)
  • Synthesis of Evidence (20% of paper grade, approximately 3-4 pages)
    • Review the research-based literature concerning the selected topic of at least 7 research articles
    • Summarize the research findings from the literature review (attach the tableafter the references page)
    • Critique the body of research on the topic as a whole (using the critiquing guidelines presented throughout the NSG 415 course)
    • Describe the methodological strengths and limitations of the current research
  • Translation- Fit and Feasibility (25% of paper grade, approximately 2-3 pages)
    • Describe the similarity/differences of the characteristics of the sample and environment to those of the population in the practice area for the proposed utilization project
    • Detail what stakeholders would need to be involved in this change of practice
    • Explain the amount of resources that would be needed to implement such a change in practice.
  • Translation Path Recommendation (25% of paper grade, approximately 2-3 pages)
    • Given the evaluation, describe what decision you would make about the utilization of the findings at this point; Include rationale for your decision
    • If determined appropriate for translation, create an action plan with the ‘change’ steps needed to implement the findings.
    • If determined not appropriate for translation, describe your next steps for further research.
    • Conclusion sentences (paragraph) at the end of the paper
  • Organization of Paper and Writing Style (5% of paper grade)
  • APA Format (5% of paper grade)- Need a total of at least 10 sources

 

 

 

 

 

Grading Rubric for the Final EBP Paper 

 

Category  

Excellent

 

 

 

Good

 

 

 

Fair

 

 

 

Poor

 

 

Possible Points

 

Abstract Exemplary; Clearly and concisely identifies purpose to include issue and brief significance, and the outcome of decision made with brief rationale; use of headings of background, purpose, methods, results, and conclusion, 1 page Proficient; Clearly identifies 2 of the 3: purpose to include issue and brief significance,  and the outcome of decision made with brief rationale; noheadings Incomplete; Clearly identifies 1 of the 3: purpose to include issue and brief significance, and the outcome of decision made with brief rationale; no headings Absent; Fails to include the abstract  

 

 

10

Introduction/Practice Question  

Exemplary; Purpose of the paper well developed and clearly stated; Clearly identified the specific issue to be addressed, include setting & population; Sound significance of the problem developed from concepts, theories and literature

 

Proficient; Purpose of the paper apparent but not developed sufficiently; Issue apparent but not described sufficiently, lacking specificity for setting &/or population;  Significance relevant but limited development

 

Incomplete; Purpose of the paper poorly developed, not clear; Issue poorly described, lacking setting or population; Significance not developed, limited support for ideas Absent; Purpose of paper absent; issue not relevant to purpose of the paper, lacking both setting and population; Significance not relevant to issue, lacks support for ideas 10
Synthesis of Evidence  

Exemplary; Conducted a thorough review of  the research-based literature concerning the selected topic,7 or more relevant research articles analyzed;  Synthesized the summary of the research findings; Accurately and effectively critiqued the body of research, clearly identified and described the methodological strengths and limitations of the current research

Table included

 

Proficient; Conducted a good review of the research-based literature concerning the selected topic, 5-6 relevant research articles used; Summarized the major highlights of the research findings; Most of the research critique was accurate, lacked depth/insight into strengths and limitations of current research

Table not included

 

Incomplete; Conducted a fair review of the research-based literature concerning the selected topic, 4 relevant research articles used; Provided a limited summary of the research findings; Incomplete critique of the research findings, missed major strengths and limitations of current research

 

Absent; Conducted a poor review of the research-based literature concerning the selected topic, < 4 relevant research articles used; Major gaps in summary of research findings; Lacks critique of research findings, lacked strengths and limitations of current research

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

Category  

Excellent

 

 

 

Good

 

 

 

Fair

 

 

 

Poor

 

 

Points

Earned

Translation- Fit and Feasibility Exemplary; Synthesized and integrated the compare and contrast of the recommendation from review of research to current level of practice; Accurately identified stakeholders to involve and resources needed for change Proficient; Provided an accurate compare and  contrast summary between the recommendation from review of research to current practice; Most of the identified stakeholders to involve and resources needed for change were accurate Incomplete; Provided a limited compare and  contrast summary between the recommendation from review of research to current practice; Failed to identify several stakeholders to involve or resources needed for change Absent; Lacked a compare and  contrast summary between the recommendation from review of research to current practice; Failed to identify stakeholders to involve and resources needed for change 25
Translation Path Recommend-ation Exemplary; Excellent evaluation of potential for implementation of research utilization project in practice; Decision and rationale relevant to review of research and comprehensive and in depth; Change steps needed and method of evaluation accurate and clearly described;

Clear and logical conclusion

Proficient; Good evaluation of potential for implementation of research utilization project in practice; Decision and rationale relevant to review of research, lacks depth; Change steps needed and method of evaluation mostly accurate; address conclusion Incomplete; Fair evaluation of potential for implementation of research utilization project in practice; Either decision or rationale lacks relevancy to review of research; Change steps needed or method of evaluation not accurate;

No conclusion

Absent; Poor evaluation of potential for implementation of research utilization project in practice; Both decision and rationale lacks relevancy to review of research; Both change steps needed and method of evaluation not accurate 25
Organization of Paper and Writing Style Exemplary; Ideas well organized and logically presented, organization supports development of ideas; Thorough discussion of ideas, includes multiple perspectives; Effective transitions from one idea to another and effective summaries with integration of ideas; clear conclusion; Sentence structure clear, correct grammar and punctuation, no spelling errors Proficient; Clear organization of main points and ideas; Adequate discussion of ideas, alternate perspectives considered; Adequate transitions from one idea to another and adequate summary of ideas; Adequate sentence structure with conclusion; minimal grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors Incomplete; Ideas not developed clearly throughout entire paper; Discussion lacks details at times, minimal alternate perspectives considered; Confusing transitions from one idea to anther and summaries lack integration of ideas; Inadequate sentence structure with unclear conclusion, several grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors Absent; Lacks organization and flow; Lacks discussion of ideas – ideas merely stated without discussion; Lacks transitions from one idea to another and lacks summaries of ideas; Poor sentence structure with no conclusion, numerous grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors 5
APA Format Exemplary; Solicited and referenced more than an adequate number of resources, citations cited accurately, reference list correct;  Professional appearance of paper, adheres to APA format of 10 or more references Proficient; Solicited and referenced fewer than expected resources, 2-3 mistakes noted with citations and in reference list; Paper legible, 2-3 errors noted in APA format;

7-9 references

 

Incomplete; Solicited and referenced suboptimal number of resources, 4-6 errors noted with citations and in reference list; Unprofessional appearance, 4-6 errors noted in APA format.

5-6 references

Absent; Solicited and referenced too few resources; >6errors noted with citations and in reference list; Unprofessional appearance, >6 errors noted in APA format

<5 references

5

 

 

What our customers say
_____

error: Content is protected !!