Fill in order details

  • Submit your instructions
    to writers for free!

Chat with the writer

  • Chat with preferred expert writers
  • Request a preview of your paper
    from them for free

Editing

  • Project edited by the quality evaluation department

Download Your Completed Project

  • Download the completed project from your account or have it sent to your email address

Plan your poster in such a way that your readers will know how to read in sequence

Rubric

Assignment 7.1 Quality Improvement Poster Rubric.
Assignment 7.1 Quality Improvement Poster Rubric.
Criteria Ratings Pts
Topic of Poster Project

10 Pts

Fully
Topic of project is clearly listed with the name and title of the presenter.

5 Pts

Mostly
Topic of project is listed with name of presenter, but one or both are unclear.

2.5 Pts

Partially
Title of project or name of presenter is clearly listed, but one or more elements are missing.

1 Pts

Does not
Missing the title of the project and the name of the presenter.
10 pts
Articulation of the Aim statement

20 Pts

Aim statement is clear and specific and answers the questions of what, how much, by when, for whom, and where.

10 Pts

Aim statement is clear and specific and answers some but not all the questions of what, how much, by when, for whom, and where.

5 Pts

Aim statement is vague or unclear or answers few of the questions of what, how much, by when, for whom, and where.

1 Pts

Aim statement is missing or vague and does not answer the questions of what, how much, by when, for whom, and where.
20 pts
Change Concept

20 Pts

Project identifies two or more change concepts.

10 Pts

Project identifies one change concept.

5 Pts

Project does not clearly identify at least one change concept, or change concepts are implied but not clearly stated.

1 Pts

Project is missing a change concept.
20 pts
Family of Measures

50 Pts

Clearly identifies: 1–2 outcome measures, 3–5 process measures, 1–2 balancing measures. Measures are clearly defined in specific terms (such as number of, percent of, rate of). Clearly explains how the data will be collected and the following: Who is responsible for collecting the data, How often the data will be collected (hourly, daily, weekly, monthly), What is to be included/excluded.

25 Pts

Clearly identifies: 1 outcome measure, 2 process measures, 0–1 balancing measures. Measures are clearly defined in specific terms (such as number of, percent of, rate of). Clearly explains how the data will be collected and the following: Who is responsible for collecting the data, How often the data will be collected (hourly, daily, weekly, monthly), What is to be included/excluded.

12.5 Pts

Clearly identifies: 0–1 outcome measures, 0–1 process measures, 0 balancing measures. Measures are vaguely defined in specific terms (such as number of, percent of, rate of). Vaguely explains how the data will be collected or fails to explain any or all the following: Who is responsible for collecting the data, How often the data will be collected (hourly, daily, weekly, monthly), What is to be included/excluded.

1 Pts

Fails to identify outcome measures, process measures, and balancing measures. Measures are not defined at all. Does not explain how the data will be collected or answer the following: Who is responsible for collecting the data, How often the data will be collected (hourly, daily, weekly, monthly), What is to be included/excluded.
50 pts
Quality Improvement Tool

50 Pts

Project clearly identifies a histogram, scatter diagram, cause-and-effect chart or flowchart. The quality improvement tool meets all the requirements listed in the project instructions.  The quality improvement tool is featured as a graphic within the poster.

25 Pts

Project clearly identifies a histogram, scatter diagram, cause-and-effect chart or flowchart. The quality improvement tool meets most of the requirements listed in the project instructions. The quality improvement tool is featured as a graphic within the poster.

12.5 Pts

Project clearly identifies a histogram, scatter diagram, cause-and-effect chart or flowchart. The quality improvement tool meets few of the requirements listed in the project instructions. The quality improvement tool is featured as a graphic within the poster but is difficult to read or understand.

1 Pts

Project does not identify a histogram, scatter diagram, cause-and-effect chart or flowchart. The quality improvement tool meets none of the requirements listed in the project instructions.  The quality improvement tool is missing or otherwise not visible on the poster.
50 pts
Analysis

10 Pts

Project clearly describes how the data will be analyzed. The data analyzed logically relates to the data that is collected and the prediction made.

5 Pts

Project adequately describes how the data will be analyzed. The data analyzed adequately relates to the data that is collected and the prediction made.

2.5 Pts

Project vaguely describes how the data will be analyzed. The data analyzed partially relates to the data that is collected and the prediction made.

1 Pts

Project does not describe how the data will be analyzed. The data analyzed does not logically relate to the data that is collected and the prediction made.
10 pts
Implications/ Impact

20 Pts

Implications, consequences, and/or questions raised by the project are thoroughly explored. Limitations are fully articulated. Project clearly discusses how the results of the analysis influence the next steps in terms of adapt, adopt, or abandon.

10 Pts

Implications, consequences, and/or questions are adequately explored. Limitations are adequately articulated. Project clearly discusses how the results of the analysis influence the next steps in terms of adapt, adopt, or abandon.

5 Pts

Implications, consequences, and/or questions are partially explored. Limitations are partially articulated. Project vaguely discusses how the results of the analysis influence the next steps in terms of adapt, adopt, or abandon.

1 Pts

Implications, consequences, and/or questions are minimally supported or unarticulated. Limitations are minimally or not articulated. Project fails to discuss how the results of the analysis influence the next steps in terms of adapt, adopt, or abandon.
20 pts
Quality of Construction

20 Pts

Words are easy to read. Poster is well organized and easy to follow. Graphics and other visuals enhance the poster.

10 Pts

Words are easy to read and there is minimal use of lengthy paragraphs of text. Poster is mostly well organized and fairly easy to follow. Graphics and other visuals enhance the poster.

5 Pts

Words are difficult to read. Poster is poorly organized and somewhat difficult to follow. Graphics and other visuals distract from the poster or are difficult to view.

1 Pts

Words are difficult to read. Poster is disorganized and impossible to follow. Graphics and other visuals do not enhance the poster or are distracting.
20 pts
Total points: 200

What our customers say
_____

error: Content is protected !!