Provide a summary of your learning style according the VARK questionnaire
Provide a summary of your learning style according the VARK questionnaire. Describe your preferred learning strategies Summary of My Learning Style According to the VARK Questionnaire According to the VARK questionnaire, my learning style is Multimodal, whereby I prefer learning concepts using multiple methods or channels of communication. Among these different ways, my largest preference is Kinesthetic, as I had the highest scores in the category. Kinesthetic learning implies that I prefer using my hands, body, and sense of touch when learning. From the results, it is clear that people with my preference like to use different formats of information such as maps, graphs, and diagrams (Truong, 2016). They also like using discussions, listening, questioning, and taking notes, practical exercises, as well as experiences. Most importantly, they like using things that are real such as case studies in understanding various concepts that boost their learning experience. Fig 1. A screenshot of my scores from the VARK website. My preferred mode of learning is multimodal, with kinesthetic being the highest choice (The VARK Questionnaire, 2019). My Preferred Learning Strategies Among the strategies I prefer in learning include class discussions as well as class lectures that have illustrative diagrams. This relates to my learning style as it is a connection of different styles to achieve one mixture of methods. The main reason why I prefer class discussions is because they allow one to express themselves to class colleagues (and other people horizontally- with common level of education) about their learning experience. Illustrative diagrams also allow one to grasp the concept without much difficulty. How Learning Styles Can Affect the Degree of Performance in Educational Activities Learning styles affect the degree of performance in educational activities in that the better the learning style, the greater the performance. People who have not learnt how to integrate their learning styles with the educational activities find it hard improving the performance in the learning forums that they are involved in (Willingham, Hughes, & Dobolyi, 2015). When working with learners, educators should investigate their individual learning styles as they would understand the most applicable techniques when imparting them with knowledge, and this can greatly improve the learning outcomes. Why Understanding the Learning Styles of Individuals Involved in Health Promotion is Important Health promotion is a marketing strategy in which marketers or members of healthcare units attempt to increase the likelihood of health products becoming more popular among members of the public (Bokhari & Zafar, 2019). Just like teachers and lecturers, individuals participating in such campaign have the goal of increasing the knowledge of various products in a positive way to the members of the public. They can achieve the results through implementing practices and lessons that directly or indirectly result to behavior change and subsequent demand of the health products. Learning styles of the recipients of health promotional material can affect behavior change in that the more the promoter is aware of the recipient’s learning style, the higher the likelihood of changing their behavior (Bokhari & Zafar, 2019). People with a greater coincidence of learning styles knowledge have a higher likelihood of achieving positive results. Behavior change is also accomplished more easily when health promoters have the potential to quickly recognize the effect of their techniques on behavior change. Different learning styles can be accommodated in health promotion by having health promotion experts who have specific specializations of teaching. That is, when a certain group of expert is specialized in educating kinesthetic learners about the product, it becomes easier to convince the clients using their own language (Bokhari & Zafar, 2019). Having different learning styles is also a source of unity among health promoters as they have to work together to build a clientele in all diverse fields. Conclusion After an analysis of my learning preferences using the questionnaire presented in the VARK Website, it is clear that I am a multimodal individual, with a high preference of kinesthetic learning techniques. This means that besides having the ability of interlinking different ways of learning, I have a high preference of using actions and using the body or touch as a way of learning. Learning styles can affect the performance in educational activities as applying the most individually suitable style imply that the learners have the best results. Understanding the learning styles of individuals in health promotion is also important as it increases the likelihood of health products becoming popular among the members of the public through implementation of behavior change practices. References Bokhari, N. M., & Zafar, M. (2019). Learning styles and approaches among medical education participants. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 8(1), 181. The VARK Questionnaire (2019). Retrieved from: http://vark-learn.com/the-vark-questionnaire/?p=results Truong, H. M. (2016). Integrating learning styles and adaptive e-learning system: Current developments, problems and opportunities. Computers in human behavior, 55, 1185-1193. Willingham, D. T., Hughes, E. M., & Dobolyi, D. G. (2015). The scientific status of learning styles theories. Teaching of Psychology, 42(3), 266-271. Assignment Question Learning styles represent the different approaches to learning based on preferences, weaknesses, and strengths. For learners to best achieve the desired educational outcome, learning styles must be considered when creating a plan. Complete “The VARK Questionnaire,”( http://vark-learn.com/the-vark-questionnaire/ ) located on the VARK website, and then complete the following: Click “OK” to receive your questionnaire scores. Once you have determined your preferred learning style, review the corresponding link to view your learning preference. Review the other learning styles: visual, aural, read/write, kinesthetic, and multimodal (listed on the VARK Questionnaire Results page). Compare your current preferred learning strategies to the identified strategies for your preferred learning style. Examine how awareness of learning styles has influenced your perceptions of teaching and learning. In a paper (750‐1,000 words), summarize your analysis of this exercise and discuss the overall value of learning styles. Include the following: Provide a summary of your learning style according the VARK questionnaire. Describe your preferred learning strategies. Compare your current preferred learning strategies to the identified strategies for your preferred learning style. Describe how individual learning styles affect the degree to which a learner can
Explain the specific socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors associated with the patient you were assigned
Explain the specific socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors associated with the patient you were assigned BUILDING A HEALTH HISTORY: COMMUNICATING EFFECTIVELY TO GATHER APPROPRIATE HEALTH-RELATED INFORMATION Effective communication is vital to constructing an accurate and detailed patient history. A patient’s health or illness is influenced by many factors, including age, gender, ethnicity, and environmental setting. There may also be significant cultural factors. In May 2012, Alice Randall wrote an article for The New York Times on the cultural factors that encouraged Black women to maintain a weight above what is considered healthy. Randall explained from her observations and her personal experience, as a Black woman, that many African American communities and cultures consider women who are overweight to be more beautiful and desirable than women at a healthier weight. As she put it, “Many black women are fat because we want to be” (Randall, 2012). Randall’s statements sparked a great deal of controversy and debate at the time; however, they emphasize an underlying reality in the healthcare field: Different populations, cultures, and groups have diverse beliefs and practices that impact their health. APRNs and other healthcare professionals should be aware of this reality and adapt their health assessment techniques and recommendations to accommodate diversity. As an advanced practice nurse, you must build a patient health history that takes into account all of the factors that make a patient unique and tailor your communication techniques accordingly. Doing so will not only help you establish rapport with each patient, but it will also enable you to more effectively gather the information needed to assess a patient’s health risks. For this first Assignment, you will take on the role of an APRN who is building a health history for a particular patient assigned by your Instructor. You will consider how social determinants of health and specific cultural considerations will influence your interview and communication techniques as you work in partnership with the patient to gather data for an accurate health history. Note: You are expected to draw on the resources for both Week 1 and Week 2 when completing your Assignment. To prepare: Reflect on your experience as an advanced practice nurse and on the information provided in the Week 1 Learning Resources on building a health history and the Week 2 Learning Resources on diversity issues in health assessments. By Day 1 of this week, your Instructor will assign a case study for this Assignment. Note: Please see the Course Announcements section of the classroom for your Case Study Assignment. Reflect on the specific socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors related to the health of your assigned patient. Consider how you would build a health history for the patient. What questions would you ask? How might you target your questions based on the patient’s social determinants of health? How would you frame the questions to be sensitive to the patient’s background, lifestyle, and culture? Identify any potential health-related risks, based on the patient’s age, gender, ethnicity, or environmental setting, which should be taken into consideration. What risk assessment instruments would be appropriate to use with this patient? What questions would you ask to assess the patient’s health risks? Select one (1) risk assessment instrument discussed in the Learning Resources, or another tool with which you are familiar, related to your selected patient. Develop five (5) targeted questions you would ask the patient to build their health history and to assess their health risks. Think about the challenges associated with communicating with patients from a variety of specific populations. What communication techniques would be most appropriate to use with this patient? What strategies can you as an APRN employ to be sensitive to different cultural factors while gathering the pertinent information? Assignment: Building a Health History With Cultural and Diversity Awareness Include the following: Explain the specific socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors associated with the patient you were assigned. Be specific. Explain the issues that you would need to be sensitive to when interacting with the patient, and why. Describe the communication techniques you would use with this patient. Include strategies to demonstrate sensitivity with this patient. Be specific and explain why you would use these techniques. Summarize the health history interview you would conduct with this patient. Provide at least five (5) targeted questions you would ask the patient to build their health history and to assess their health risks. Explain your reasoning for each question and how you frame each for this specific patient. Identify the risk assessment instrument you selected, and then justify why it would be applicable to your assigned patient. Be specific. Include a reference list with a minimum of 3 scholarly articles. Expert Answer and Explanation Building a Culturally Sensitive Health History for WH, a 62-Year-Old Chinese Male Health assessments are key in comprehending patient needs and informing clinical decision-making. In order to be effective, evaluations should extend beyond the physical and address cultural, socioeconomic, and spiritual backgrounds (Ball et al., 2023). The case of WH, a 62-year-old Chinese male with low English proficiency, demonstrates the significance of taking history in a culturally sensitive manner. The background of WH, family life, and his health beliefs shape his contention to care and its comprehension. Cultural awareness, the correct type of communication strategies, and sensitivity to social determinants of health will make it possible to construct an effective health history of this patient. This paper aims to analyse the factors, issues, communication methods, questions to be asked, and risk assessment tools applicable to developing a culturally sensitive health history of WH. Social, Economic, Spiritual, Lifestyle, and Cultural Factors. There are barriers to health care among Chinese immigrants and older Chinese adults that influence their experiences with the management of chronic illness. Research indicates that access and adherence are lower due to language barriers, lack of health literacy, financial limitations, and familiarity with the Western medical system (Zhu et al., 2024). WH relies on his daughter to communicate and navigate the health system, which can restrict his autonomy. Social isolation associated with his being a widower may also make
Research the health-illness continuum and its relevance to patient care. In a 750-1,000-word paper
Research the health-illness continuum and its relevance to patient care. The Health-Illness Continuum Perspective and its Importance in the Health and the Human Experience when Caring for Patients The Health-Illness continuum perspective represents a graphical or diagrammatic illustration of the concept of human well-being on their emotional and mental states. For some people, wellness is the direct opposite of illness, where the absence of disease conditions shows they are well (Swanson et al., 2019). Other individuals believe that having a healthy lifestyle or the potential to lead a healthy lifestyle is the real definition of wellness (Kishan, 2020). A pictorial illustration of the illness-wellness continuum is as follows. Fig 1: An illustration of the illness-wellness continuum. The right side of the graph in Fig 1 shows the different degrees of wellness, while the left side shows illness levels. In this continuum, wellness is explained to be dynamic, in that it is not static, and that the patient is often changing in their present states. Individuals’ outlook is what contributes to their states of wellness for the positive vision of a person who has a disability or a disease, and such a person is likely to face the right side of the continuum (Ow & Poon, 2020). This is unlike a healthy individual who has a negative outlook, feels anxiety, complains a lot, and is depressed. The latter would face the left side of the continuum, and their emotional and mental growth and wellness are hindered to the point that they experience the real state of wellness. How Understanding the Health-Illness Continuum Could Enable Healthcare Providers to Better-Promote the Value and Dignity of Individuals or Groups and Serve others in Ways that Promote Human Flourishing In caring for patients, understanding the health-illness continuum helps to improve the patients’ mental and emotional development. Healthcare givers can use this continuum to motivate the patients’ healthcare and have better health systems including but not limited to, preventing emotional and physical diseases (Sajnani, Marxen, & Zarate, 2017). This continuum is also essential in patient care as it helps to analyze the different developments and evaluate the patient progress. A Reflection of My Overall State of Health and the Behaviors that Support or Detract from Health and Well-Being Several behaviors support my overall state of health, and these include but are not limited to workouts, exercises, and healthy eating. I believe what I eat and my behaviors determine how I will show wellness. I have to continually keep my weight in check, where a negative shift in my BMI prompts me to change my diet and my workout strategies. Besides hitting the gym at least thrice a week, I do regular jogging in the morning before embarking on my daily activities, which I believe serves a long way in improving my emotional well-being. I also walk for 30 minutes to the gym instead of using other less engaging means of transport. I have recently started consuming plenty of water and many greens, which I believe will help me improve my immunity from diseases. Among the negative behaviors that could be distracting me from wellness is smoking, which I did not know its detrimental effects until a recent webinar on lung cancer. Also, I think I barely have enough time to have a healthy sleep. Lastly, I believe I spend too little time with my loved ones due to excessive engagement in my workplace. Options and Resources that Could Help Me to Move toward Wellness on the Health-Illness Spectrum Among the essential resources to help me improve wellness on the spectrum are programs to stop my smoking habit. I receive a lot of pleasure from smoking, which I believe is healthy, but it is also clear that there are several adverse effects (Pickard, 2018). I have already accessed several support groups from smokers, which will help me improve my score in the spectrum. Also, I hope to use my digital calendar to manage my sleep schedules better. Conclusion An individual’s score in the health-illness spectrum is based on their feelings towards healthcare and their perceptions of their health conditions. People who feel that they lack some wellness despite all positive physical signs are more likely to show lower scores. As a healthcare giver, understanding the health-illness continuum helps improve the patients’ mental and emotional development. I believe some of the behaviors that promote my scores are routine exercising and checking on my diet. Smoking, inadequate sleep, and disconnection from family are some of the things that could contribute to lower scores. Resources such as support groups for smokers could help me to improve my scores significantly. References Kishan, P. (2020). Yoga and Spirituality in Mental Health: Illness to Wellness. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 42(5), 411-420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0253717620946995 Ow, R., & Poon, A. W. C. (2020). Theories on Mental Health, Illness and Intervention. Mental Health and Social Work, 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6975-9_1 Pickard, S. (2018). Health, Illness and Frailty in Old Age: A Phenomenological Exploration. Journal of aging studies, 47, 24-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2018.10.002 Sajnani, N., Marxen, E., & Zarate, R. (2017). Critical Perspectives in the Arts Therapies: Response/Ability across a Continuum of Practice. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 54, 28-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2017.01.007 Swanson, C., Thompson, A., Valentz, R., Doerner, L., & Jezek, K. (2019). Theory of Nursing for the Whole Person: A Distinctly Scriptural Framework. Journal of Christian Nursing, 36(4), 222-227. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/cnj.0000000000000656 Benchmark – Human Experience Across the Health–Illness Continuum Research the health-illness continuum and its relevance to patient care. In a 750-1,000-word paper, discuss the relevance of the continuum to patient care and present a perspective of your current state of health in relation to the wellness spectrum. Include the following: Examine the health-illness continuum and discuss why this perspective is important to consider in relation to health and the human experience when caring for patients. Explain how understanding the health-illness continuum enables you, as a health care provider, to better promote the value and dignity of individuals or groups and to serve others in ways that promote human flourishing and are consistent with the Christian worldview. Reflect on your
[Solved] Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Note and Patient Case Presentation
Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Note and Patient Case Presentation Psychiatric notes are a way to reflect on your practicum experiences and connect them to the didactic learning you gain from your NRNP courses. Comprehensive psychiatric evaluation notes, such as the ones required in this practicum course, are often used in clinical settings to document patient care. For this Assignment, you will document information about a patient that you examined in a group setting during the last 4 weeks, using the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Note Template provided. You will then use this note to develop and record a case presentation for this patient. To Prepare Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide about clinical practice guidelines. Select a group patient for whom you conducted psychotherapy for a mood disorderduring the last 4 weeks. Create a Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Note on this patient using the template provided in the Learning Resources. There is also a completed template provided as an exemplar and guide. All psychiatric evaluation notes must be signed by your Preceptor. When you submit your note, you should include the complete comprehensive psychiatric evaluation note as a Word document and pdf/images the completed assignment signed by your Preceptor. You must submit your note using Turnitin. Please Note: Electronic signatures are not accepted. If both files are not received by the due date, Faculty will deduct points per the Walden Grading Policy. Then, based on your evaluation of this patient, develop a video presentation of the case. Plan your presentation using the Assignment rubric and rehearse what you plan to say. Be sure to review the Kalturasupport resources in the Classroom Support Center found by clicking on the Help Include at least five scholarly resources to support your assessment and diagnostic reasoning. Ensure that you have the appropriate lighting and equipment to record the presentation. The Assignment Record yourself presenting the complex case for your clinical patient. Do not sit and read your written evaluation! The video portion of the assignment is a simulation to demonstrate your ability to succinctly and effectively present a complex case to a colleague for a case consultation. The written portion of this assignment is a simulation for you to demonstrate to the faculty your ability to document the complex case as you would in an electronic medical record. The written portion of the assignment will be used as a guide for faculty to review your video to determine if you are omitting pertinent information or including non-essential information during your case staffing consultation video. In your presentation: Dress professionally and present yourself in a professional manner. Display your photo ID at the start of the video when you introduce yourself. Ensure that you do not include any information that violates the principles of HIPAA (i.e., don’t use the patient’s name or any other identifying information). Present the full complex case study. Be succinct in your presentation, and do not exceed 8 minutes. Include subjective and objective data; assessment from most recent mental status exam; current psychiatric diagnosis including differentials that were ruled out; current psychotherapeutic plan (include one health promotion activity and one patient education strategy you provided); and patient progress toward treatment goals. Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What was the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life? Objective: What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment? Assessment: Discuss the patient’s mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses in order of highest to lowest priority and explain why you chose them. What was your primary diagnosis and why? Describe how your primary diagnosis aligns with DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria and is supported by the patient’s symptoms. Plan: Describe your treatment modality and your plan for psychotherapy. Explain the principles of psychotherapy that underline your chosen treatment plan to support your rationale for the chosen psychotherapy framework. What were your follow-up plan and parameters? What referrals would you make or recommend as a result of this psychotherapy session? Reflection notes: What would you do differently in a similar patient evaluation? Reflect on one social determinant of health according to the HealthyPeople 2030 (you will need to research) as applied to this case in the realm of psychiatry and mental health. As a future advanced provider, what are one health promotion activity and one patient education consideration for this patient for improving health disparities and inequities in the realm of psychiatry and mental health? Demonstrate your critical thinking. Expert Answer and Explanation Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Note Subjective CC (chief complaint): “I feel sad most of the time and have no energy to do anything.” HPI: M.M. is a 42-year-old African American woman seeking assessment and treatment for symptoms of depression. She describes ongoing low mood, lack of pleasure, difficulty concentrating, and sleep issues over the last four months, with gradual deterioration. She reports major exhaustion, sensations of worthlessness, and occasional passive thoughts of “not wanting to wake up,” yet she refutes any active suicidal ideation, planning, or intent. Appetite has diminished, resulting in slight weight loss. She rejects any present anxiety, panic episodes, hallucinations, or manic signs. Psychiatric ROS (rule-out): Depression: Reports depressed mood, anhedonia, fatigue, poor sleep, poor concentration. Mania: Denies elevated mood, grandiosity, pressured speech, decreased need for sleep. Psychosis: Denies hallucinations, delusions, paranoia. Anxiety: Denies generalized worry, panic episodes, OCD symptoms. Substance use: Denies active use (see below). Past Psychiatric History: General Statement: First entered treatment at age 25 for postpartum depression. Caregivers: None currently. Hospitalizations: One psychiatric hospitalization at age 30 following suicidal ideation without attempt. Medication trials: Previously prescribed sertraline (ineffective), fluoxetine (caused restlessness), venlafaxine (mild benefit, discontinued for cost). Psychotherapy/Previous Psychiatric Diagnosis: History of major depressive disorder, recurrent; attended CBT-based therapy in the past, reported moderate benefit. Substance Use History: Denies alcohol, tobacco, or illicit drug use. Drinks one cup of coffee daily. No history of withdrawal seizures, tremors, or detoxification. Family Psychiatric/Substance Use History: Mother with major depressive disorder; father with alcohol use disorder (deceased due to liver cirrhosis).
[Solved] Post a brief description of the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
Post a brief description of the results of your Work Environment Assessment. Based on the results, how civil is your workplace? Discussion: Workplace Environment Assessment How healthy is your workplace? You may think your current organization operates seamlessly, or you may feel it has many issues. You may experience or even observe things that give you pause. Yet, much as you wouldn’t try to determine the health of a patient through mere observation, you should not attempt to gauge the health of your work environment based on observation and opinion. Often, there are issues you perceive as problems that others do not; similarly, issues may run much deeper than leadership recognizes. There are many factors and measures that may impact organizational health. Among these is civility. While an organization can institute policies designed to promote such things as civility, how can it be sure these are managed effectively? In this Discussion, you will examine the use of tools in measuring workplace civility. Post a brief description of the results of your Work Environment Assessment. Based on the results, how civil is your workplace? Explain why your workplace is or is not civil. Then, describe a situation where you have experienced incivility in the workplace. How was this addressed? Be specific and provide examples. Expert Guide and Explanation Workplace Environment Assessment Analysis of the Results Analysis of the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory results reveals the variation in the civility levels, signifying unstable health of the workplace environment. This assessment considers various dimensions including the wellbeing of the staff, communication, and trust. Considering the results of the assessment, the workplace has mixed civility, with favorable outcomes seen with some dimensions, and others exhibiting unfavorable attributes. The organization scores favorably if assessed through the lens of communication and teamwork. However, it needs to improve on allocation of work, and making resources available for the staff as part of the interventions focused on making the workplace healthy. Reason for the Lack or Present of Civility The results show higher scores in a number of areas including the recognition of the employees’ efforts, and reciprocated respect, which contributes to the civility of the workplace. However, infective management of the resources, lack of trust, and unfairness compromise the health of the workplace environment by causing the loss of satisfaction with one’s job (Clark, 2019). Example of Uncivil Behavior at the Workplace Uncivil behavior that I witnessed involved a supervisor dismissing the contributions made by their juniors during a meeting held to discuss solutions to the spike in rates of patient readmissions. The supervisor frequently interjected their juniors, which made it difficult for them to contribute meaningful ideas that could help resolve the issue (McDermott, Bernard, & Hathaway, 2021). To address this issue, the organizers of the meeting reiterated the need for everyone to be given a fair chance to contribute towards finding practical solutions. The moderators adopted an approach in which they shared constructive feedback with the attendees, acknowledging their meaningful contributions. This encouraged those involved in the meeting to share their views (Lee & Miller, 2022). References Clark, C. M. (2019). Fostering A Culture Of Civility And Respect In Nursing. Links to an external site.. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 10(1), 44–52. Lee, S., & Miller, K. (2022). Developing A Diversity, Equity, And Civility Council To Advance Health Equity In Nursing Academia And Practice. Links to an external site.. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 46(3), E16–E23. McDermott, C., Bernard, N., & Hathaway, W. (2021). Taking a stand against workplace incivility. Links to an external site.. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 52(5), 232–239. Need help with a similar assignment? Our experts can write a 100% original version for you Chat Directly with Us on WhatsApp The Complete Guide to Workplace Environment Assessment: Evaluating and Improving Workplace Civility A workplace environment assessment is a systematic evaluation tool that measures various aspects of organizational culture, employee satisfaction, and workplace civility. Understanding how to conduct and interpret these assessments is crucial for creating healthier, more productive work environments that foster respect, collaboration, and professional growth. What Is a Workplace Environment Assessment? A workplace environment assessment is a comprehensive evaluation process that examines the physical, psychological, and social aspects of a work environment. These assessments typically measure factors such as communication patterns, leadership effectiveness, workplace civility, employee engagement, and overall organizational health. The primary purpose of conducting a workplace environment assessment is to identify strengths and weaknesses within an organization’s culture and provide actionable insights for improvement. This process helps organizations understand how civil their workplace is and what factors contribute to or detract from a positive work environment. Understanding Workplace Civility Workplace civility refers to the basic level of respect, courtesy, and consideration that employees show toward one another in professional settings. A civil workplace is characterized by polite interactions, respectful communication, collaborative problem-solving, and mutual support among team members. Key Components of Workplace Civility Respectful Communication: Employees engage in professional dialogue, listen actively to colleagues, and express disagreements constructively without personal attacks or dismissive behavior. Inclusive Behavior: Team members demonstrate cultural sensitivity, welcome diverse perspectives, and ensure all voices are heard during meetings and decision-making processes. Professional Courtesy: Workers maintain appropriate boundaries, show consideration for others’ time and workload, and demonstrate basic etiquette in both face-to-face and digital communications. Conflict Resolution: When disagreements arise, employees address issues directly with the involved parties rather than engaging in gossip or undermining behavior. Common Workplace Environment Assessment Tools Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory The Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory is one of the most widely used workplace environment assessment tools. This instrument evaluates various dimensions of workplace health and provides scores that help organizations understand their current state. Score Range Classification Characteristics 90-100 Very Healthy Excellent communication, strong leadership, high trust 80-89 Healthy Good collaboration, effective management, positive culture 70-79 Moderately Healthy Some areas for improvement, mixed feedback 60-69 Barely Healthy Significant concerns, inconsistent practices Below 60 Unhealthy Major issues requiring immediate attention Other Assessment Methods Employee Engagement Surveys: Comprehensive questionnaires that measure job satisfaction, commitment levels, and emotional connection to the organization.
For this assignment select a health behavior theory/model relevant to the health issue identified in your needs assessment
For this assignment select a health behavior theory/model relevant to the health issue identified in your needs assessment For this assignment select a health behavior theory/model relevant to the health issue identified in your needs assessment. You will continue to use this model or theory in subsequent assignments to inform the intervention for your public health project. From the list provided of common health behavior theories in the provided resource, “Categories and Examples of Health Behavior Theories/Models,” select one that best fits your chosen public. In 750–1,000 words, discuss the following: Describe the health behavior theory or model selected and explain why this is the best choice based on your chosen health issue. Explain how this health behavior theory or model will help support behavior change for your health issue and explain why this theory or model is best for supporting behavior change. You are required to cite three to five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and public health content. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance. Expert Answer and Explanation Public Health Project – Community Theory Application Due to a combination of biological, socioeconomic, cultural, and environmental variables, Black Americans are disproportionately affected by type II diabetes (T2DM), a significant public health concern in the United States (Ahmed et al., 2025). This community faces obstacles such restricted access to reasonably priced, healthful foods, disparities in healthcare delivery, and social circumstances that limit possibilities for physical activity and preventive care, as the needs assessment made clear (Hill-Briggs et al., 2022). Adopting a health behavior theory that emphasizes individual-level change while acknowledging the impact of more extensive social and structural variables is crucial to creating a successful intervention (Habibi et al., 2022). This paper will address the Social Ecological Model (SEM) as it is a particularly pertinent framework for this problem. Overview of the Social Ecological Model (SEM) The Social Ecological Model is a commonly utilized theoretical framework in public health that acknowledges the intricate interactions of various levels of influence on personal behavior (Habibi et al., 2022). Founded upon ecological systems theory, the Social Ecological Model (SEM) encapsulates the complex context that influences health in underrepresented communities. For Black Americans, the occurrence of Type II diabetes is not just a product of individual choices but is significantly shaped by systemic obstacles including food deserts, restricted healthcare access, economic disadvantage, and structural racism (Ahmed et al., 2025). The SEM recognizes these wider influences, enhancing its suitability for crafting interventions that extend past personal education to incorporate community efforts and policy reforms. The SEM offers a framework for effective and equitable interventions by taking into account factors across various levels (individual, interpersonal, organizational, community, and policy), ensuring that individuals receive support from social and structural environments that promote healthier lifestyles (Ioannou et al., 2024). Why the SEM is the Best Choice for This Health Issue The choice of SEM to treat Type II diabetes in the Black American community stems from the understanding that the condition is impacted by variables that go well beyond dietary and exercise choices made at the individual level (Mosley-Johnson et al., 2022). When creating treatments, systemic obstacles including food deserts, restricted access to healthcare, socioeconomic disadvantage, and structural racism must be taken into account, even though individual knowledge and behaviors are crucial. The complex context that influences health in underserved populations is captured by SEM. For instance, encouraging people to eat healthily won’t work if there is no any reasonably priced fresh vegetables in their communities (Mosley-Johnson et al., 2022). In a similar manner, encouraging physical exercise necessitates removing obstacles like dangerous streets and a dearth of parks. The SEM’s focus on community and policy levels makes it uniquely suited to addressing disparities in diabetes prevalence among Black Americans. It provides a framework for integrating individual and family-level education with broader community initiatives and systemic advocacy. Supporting Behavior Change Through SEM The Social Ecological Model (SEM) promotes sustainable behavior change for Type II diabetes in the Black community by addressing influences across individual, social, organizational, community, and policy levels (Ahmed et al., 2025). At the individual level, culturally tailored diabetes education can improve knowledge of nutrition, exercise, and self-management. Interpersonal supports, such as family involvement and church-based wellness programs, encourage collective lifestyle changes. Organizationally, healthcare systems can expand early screening and access to culturally competent educators (Mosley-Johnson et al., 2022). At the community level, initiatives like farmers’ markets, community gardens, and safe recreational spaces address environmental barriers while building trust through local partnerships. Policy initiatives that address systemic injustices that sustain health disparities include Medicaid expansion, grocery store incentives in underserved communities, and reduced insulin costs. SEM is a particularly useful approach for addressing diabetes disparities in Black Americans because it integrates treatments across several interrelated levels. Why SEM is Best for Supporting Change in This Population Because it takes into account the fact that social injustices are the primary cause of health disparities, the SEM is most appropriate for treating Type II diabetes in Black Americans (Mosley-Johnson et al., 2022). SEM recognizes how institutional racism, economic inequality, and environmental factors create barriers that restrict the effectiveness of individual-focused solutions, as contrast to models that only emphasize human responsibility. Policies that expand access to reasonably priced healthcare, for instance, will support community-level involvement and individual-level education, resulting in a positive feedback loop. SEM promotes the creation of interventions that are culturally appropriate (Mosley-Johnson et al., 2022). Public health practitioners can create solutions that are in line with the values and lived experiences of Black Americans by taking into account interpersonal dynamics,
What is the purpose of using health behavior theories or models in program planning?
What is the purpose of using health behavior theories or models in program planning? DQ 1 What is the purpose of using health behavior theories or models in program planning? Discuss the role and importance of health behavior theories when planning and evaluating health promotion programs. Describe an example of how a health behavior theory/model has been used in health behavior research or practice. Expert Answer and Explanation The Purpose of Using Health Behavior Theories or Models in Program Planning The health behavior theories or models like the Health Belief Model (HBM) provide the frameworks for understanding individuals’ health behaviors, supporting the planning of the health programs. In terms of planning in this case, the models or theories contribute to understanding of the different factors that determine health behavior. In particular, they support the identification of the environmental and cultural factors that shape people’s health-seeking behaviors. Their usefulness is also noticeable during the design of interventions considering that program planners rely on the models or the theories to identify the determinants of change of behavior (Sales, Farr, & Spertus, 2022). Given that theories may attribute health behavior to individuals’ attitudes and access to support systems, planners may rely on this information to inform interventions. The Role and Importance of Health Behavior Theories When Planning and Evaluating Health Promotion Programs The theories of health behavior support planning and appraisal of the health promotion initiatives. When it comes to planning, theoretical frameworks support the evaluation of the public health needs, development of objectives, and selection of appropriate measures. During the appraisal of the health programs, these frameworks help guide the assessment of the effectiveness of the program by highlighting the criteria that evaluators can use to evaluate the program. Example of How Health Behavior Theory has been Applied in Health Behavior Research The HBM is a popular model utilized in practice setting. In particular, it contributes to understanding of health behaviors through the different concepts which account for the reasons why people engage in health promotion activities (Alamer, 2024). For instance, the model explains why an individual may quit smoking, or why they may start exercising. References Alamer, A. S. (2024). Behavior Change Theories and Models Within Health Belief Model Research: A Five-Decade Holistic Bibliometric Analysis. Cureus, 16(6), e63143. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.63143. Sales, A. E., Farr, S. L., & Spertus, J. A. (2022). The Influence of Health Behavior Theory on Implementation Practice and Science: Brief Review and Commentary. Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 10(5), 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy10050115. DQ 2 Compare two health behavior theories or models that relate to a health issue that interests you. Which theory/model best supports this health issue and why? How can that theory/model inform the development of a program for that health issue? Expert Answer and Explanation Comparison of Two Health Behavior Theories or Models The Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) and the Health Belief Model (HBM) provide the frameworks for explaining health behaviors like refusal of the vaccines. The SCT highlights the interconnection of various factors in shaping individuals’ health behaviors. These factors are environmental, behavioral and personal. According to this theory, people model health behaviors from individuals within their social circles, and their decision to adopt health-friendly behaviors depends on the rewards they receive by embracing these behaviors. This theory also attributes positive health-seeking behaviors to self-efficacy. For its part, the HBM suggests that individuals’ decisions to adopt meaningful health behaviors depends on their beliefs about their susceptibility to disease, the seriousness of their health status, and capacity of health actions to minimize their risk of developing health complications. Just like the SCT, the HBM contributes to understanding of the individuals’ health behaviors even though the former provides a more comprehensive framework for understanding health behavior (Alamer, 2024). The Model that Best Supports the Health Issue While the two models account for the health behaviors, the SCT is the most ideal theory for explaining the reason why people may refuse to take vaccines. This is the best framework because vaccine refusal is a behavior that is tied to various factors beyond personal decisions or perceptions. People may refuse vaccines on religious, social and cultural grounds (Zhai et al., 2023). For instance, a Muslim may refuse a vaccine made from pig products due to religious reasons. How the Theory Informs the Development of Programs for the Health Issue The SCT is useful in informing the development of programs for tackling vaccine refusal. Interventions guided by the theory could include the change of institutional and social factors that drive the fear of vaccines (Zhai et al., 2023). References Alamer, A. S. (2024). Behavior Change Theories and Models Within Health Belief Model Research: A Five-Decade Holistic Bibliometric Analysis. Cureus, 16(6), e63143. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.63143. Zhai, S., Hash, J., Ward, T. M., Yuwen, W., & Sonney, J. (2023). Analysis, Evaluation, and Reformulation of Social Cognitive Theory: Toward Parent-Child Shared Management in Sleep Health. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 73, e65–e74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2023.07.011. Place your order now on a similar assignment and get fast, cheap and best quality work written by our expert level assignment writers. Use Coupon Code: NEW30 to Get 30% OFF Your First Order The Essential Role of Health Behavior Theories in Program Planning: A Comprehensive Guide for Public Health Professionals Introduction: Why Health Behavior Theories Matter in Program Planning When I first began working in public health program development in 2019, I made a critical mistake that many practitioners make: I designed an intervention based purely on intuition and available resources, without grounding it in established health behavior theories. The result? A diabetes prevention program with disappointing participation rates and minimal behavior change among participants. The purpose of using health behavior theories or models in program planning is to provide a systematic, evidence-based framework for understanding why people behave the way they do and how to effectively influence health behaviors. These theories serve as the architectural blueprint for health promotion programs, guiding everything from initial needs assessment through final evaluation. Health behavior theories and models are essential because they: Identify modifiable factors that influence health behaviors Provide testable hypotheses about behavior change mechanisms
Based on the PICOT you developed for NUR-550, summarize the intervention you are proposing. How does this support the population of focus, your setting, and role?
Based on the PICOT you developed for NUR-550, summarize the intervention you are proposing. How does this support the population of focus, your setting, and role? Based on the PICOT you developed for NUR-550, summarize the intervention you are proposing. How does this support the population of focus, your setting, and role? Justify how the problem you selected to investigate is amenable to a research-based intervention using the PICOT format. Include your PICOT statement with your response. Expert Answer and Explanation: DQ 1 PICOT Intervention Overview Using medical cannabis instead of opioid drugs to treat chronic non-cancer pain in adults is the suggested intervention based on the PICOT question. This strategy prioritizes lowering opioid dependence while improving pain management results and limiting unfavorable side effects. According to research, medical cannabis works by interacting with endocannabinoid receptors to produce analgesic benefits without the substantial risk of opioid dependence or overdose (MacCallum et al., 2021). Adults with chronic pain who are more likely to experience opioid-related problems are supported by the suggested intervention. A patient-centered and possibly safer approach is provided by the introduction of medical cannabis as a first-line or adjunct treatment in clinical settings, particularly outpatient and pain management clinics. Advocating for evidence-based alternatives promotes clinical safety and comprehensive treatment as a prospective Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP). The issue of chronic pain management is particularly suited to research-based intervention due to its widespread prevalence, complex treatment needs, and the public health burden of opioid misuse. The PICOT format provides a clear framework for evaluating how medical cannabis compares to traditional opioid therapy in achieving pain control and minimizing side effects. This structured question supports targeted data collection and outcome assessment in clinical trials or quality improvement studies (Greis et al., 2022). When the concern is able to be addressed through the use of the research lens, clinicians can generate actionable evidence to inform prescribing practices, improve quality of life for chronic pain sufferers, and contribute to more sustainable pain management models. PICOT Statement: In adults with chronic non-cancer pain (P), how does the use of medical cannabis (I) compared to opioids (C) affect pain relief and adverse side effects (O) during the treatment period (T)? References Greis, A., Larsen, E., Liu, C., Renslo, B., Radakrishnan, A., & Wilson-Poe, A. R. (2022). Perceived efficacy, reduced prescription drug use, and minimal side effects of cannabis in patients with chronic orthopedic pain. Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, 7(6), 865–875. https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2021.0088 MacCallum, C. A., Eadie, L., Barr, A. M., Boivin, M., & Lu, S. (2021). Practical strategies using medical cannabis to reduce harms associated with long-term opioid use in chronic pain. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 12, 633168. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.633168 Explain the importance of a “spirit of inquiry” in an evidence-based culture and what you can do as an advanced registered nurse to encourage this within your practice or organization. Compare the role and implementation of EBP in your specialty area with another advanced registered nurse specialty. Expert Answer and Explanation: DQ 2 Spirit of Inquiry in Evidence-Based Practice A “spirit of inquiry” is essential to establishing and maintaining a culture of evidence-based practice (EBP). It entails a way of thinking that actively challenges accepted wisdom and looks for better, empirically backed ways to enhance patient outcomes. Healthcare workers are more inclined to question established procedures, seek out new information, and challenge established practices in an atmosphere that values inquiry (Anderson et al., 2022). Promoting this culture as an advanced registered nurse starts with setting an example of curiosity, taking part in clinical research, and helping colleagues evaluate and use evidence. Practical strategies to integrate inquiry into everyday routines and decision-making include facilitating journal clubs, including frequent EBP talks into team meetings, and spearheading quality improvement projects. EBP is widely used in primary care settings by Family Nurse Practitioners (FNPs), who must rely on the most recent research and guidelines to manage chronic conditions, encourage preventative care, and make medication decisions. In order to improve therapeutic pathways for the management of diabetes, hypertension, and mental health screening, the FNP frequently starts EBP projects. A Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioner (PMHNP), on the other hand, might apply EBP in relation to behavioral therapies, therapy modalities, and psychopharmacology (Makic, 2025). Although both positions employ EBP to improve patient care, the PMHNP uses evidence to promote mental and emotional health, while the FNP concentrates more on physical health issues. Notwithstanding these distinctions, both specialties need a strong spirit of inquiry to guarantee that optimal practices are applied to a variety of patient populations. References Anderson, J., Dineen‐Griffin, S., & Stanley, D. (2022). Creating a Spirit of Enquiry (Enhancing Research). Clinical Leadership in Nursing and Healthcare, 303-321. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119869375.ch14 Makic, M. B. F. (2025). Fostering a Spirit of Inquiry: Inspiring Nurses to Advance Practice Based on Best Evidence. American Journal of Critical Care, 34(4), 255-265. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2025493 Place your order now on a similar assignment and get fast, cheap and best quality work written by our expert level assignment writers. Use Coupon Code: NEW30 to Get 30% OFF Your First Order Based on the PICOT You Developed for NUR-550: A Comprehensive Guide to Summarizing Your Intervention and Research Justification Introduction As you transition from NUR-550 to NUR-590, one of the most critical steps is articulating how your PICOT-formulated intervention addresses a specific nursing practice problem. This guide provides evidence-based strategies for summarizing your proposed intervention, justifying its research basis, and demonstrating its relevance to your population, setting, and professional role. Understanding the PICOT Framework in Advanced Nursing Practice The PICOT (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Time) framework serves as the foundation for evidence-based practice (EBP) in nursing. According to Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt (2019), this structured approach ensures that clinical questions are answerable through research and directly applicable to patient care improvement. Why Your PICOT Statement Matters Your PICOT statement from NUR-550 represents more than an academic exercise—it’s a blueprint for implementing meaningful change in healthcare delivery. The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN, 2021) emphasizes that Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) students must demonstrate competency in translating
What is the relevance of a needs assessment in health promotion planning? Discuss the steps involved in conducting a needs assessment
What is the relevance of a needs assessment in health promotion planning? Discuss the steps involved in conducting a needs assessment What is the relevance of a needs assessment in health promotion planning? Discuss the steps involved in conducting a needs assessment. Describe examples of primary data, secondary data, and other evidence that you would collect or review in order to identify the needs of the target population you identified for your project. Expert Answer and Explanation Relevance of Needs Assessment in Health Promotion Planning The needs assessment is at the center of effective health promotion since it offers a methodical perception of the health priorities, resources, and shortages in a targeted community/population. Nutbeam and Muscat (2021) claim that evidence-based planning is essential in health promotion because it helps to make interventions relevant and sustainable. Without assessment, interventions are prone to being mismatched with the needs of the community, hence lowering their effectiveness. Comprehensive evaluation also consolidates stakeholder engagement and makes sure resources are diverted to the most urgent health issues (Kreuter et al., 2021). Processes of the Needs Assessment A needs assessment is a process that usually entails a number of steps. To begin with, it is important to define the target population and the extent of the evaluation to give the data collection boundaries. Second, the use of numerous sources of data allows for the development of a complete vision of health requirements. Third, the assessment and prioritization of the findings enable the practitioners to discover the main health problems and their determinants. Lastly, the results are disseminated to the stakeholders to guide collaborative planning and creation of specific interventions (Nutbeam & Muscat, 2021). Samples of Data and Evidence to Gather Primary and secondary sources are combined in the data collection of a needs assessment. Primary data can consist of community surveys, focus groups, or interviews with patients and healthcare providers, and can provide a firsthand view of lived experiences and needs. The secondary data can include hospital records, census data, and epidemiological reports, which can be used to determine the larger patterns and disparities (Kreuter et al., 2021). Social determinants of health and resource provision are put in context by additional evidence, including policy reviews or environmental scans. Combining these data sources makes it possible to have a comprehensive view of community requirements. References Kreuter, M. W., Thompson, T., McQueen, A., & Garg, R. (2021). Addressing social needs in health care settings: Evidence, challenges, and opportunities for public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 42(1), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102204 Nutbeam, D., & Muscat, D. M. (2021). Health promotion glossary 2021. Health Promotion International, 36(6), 1578–1598. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daab067 Considering the health issue and target population you have identified, describe some ways in which the target population and key stakeholders can be involved in a needs assessment for your project. Describe a specific opportunity for community collaboration or partnership. What principles of servant leadership can be applied to this collaboration to build leadership and support the community? What faith leader or faith community could you reach out to for additional feedback? How might you integrate feedback from the community and stakeholders gathered during the needs assessment to ensure that the health project is aligned with both the Christian worldview and the specific needs of the community? Expert Answer and Explanation Involving the Target Population and Stakeholders To prevent Type II Diabetes Mellitus in African Americans, active involvement of the target population and stakeholders is necessary in order to conduct a needs assessment. Engaging community members in the form of focus groups, health forums, and patient advisory teams will make sure that their lived experience, cultural values, and issues are captured to the point. Local clinicians, public health organizations, and faith leaders are also stakeholders who can help identify the obstacles to care and resources that can be used to intervene (Hill-Briggs et al., 2022). This participatory method builds trust and gives a greater chance of acceptance of the programs. The Community Collaboration Opportunity One of the areas of potential cooperation is the establishment of a partnership with local African American churches that offer health ministries. More frequently, these churches are a reputable source of education and outreach, thus being perfect locations to support diabetes awareness interventions, health screenings, and culturally-specific interventions (Golden et al., 2021). Through such work, these institutions can be used by the project to use the existing community networks to foster sustainable health improvements. Putting in perspective the Servant Leadership Principles Principles of servant leadership like empathy, stewardship and commitment to community growth can drive collaboration. Health professionals show humility and respect in prioritizing the voices of African American patients and faith leaders, thus strengthening community empowerment. Faith leaders, including African American Baptist church pastors, might prove to be crucial collaborators who give feedback and spiritual support. Need to integrate Feedback and Christian Worldview The project design needs to integrate feedback provided by stakeholders so that the interventions can be culturally oriented and tackle the actual barriers. The Christian worldview also focuses on compassion, service, and equity (Philippians 2:34), and encourages practitioners to focus on the welfare of the vulnerable masses. This coincidence makes the health promotion program stronger in terms of its ethical and operational performance. References Golden, S. H., Joseph, J. J., & Hill-Briggs, F. (2021). Casting a health equity lens on endocrinology and diabetes. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 106(4), e1909-e1916. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa938 Hill-Briggs, F., Ephraim, P. L., Vrany, E. A., Davidson, K. W., Pekmezaris, R., Salas-Lopez, D., … & Gary-Webb, T. L. (2022). Social determinants of health, race, and diabetes population health improvement: Black/African Americans as a population exemplar. Current diabetes reports, 22(3), 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-022-01454-3 Place your order now on a similar assignment and get fast, cheap and best quality work written by our expert level assignment writers. Use Coupon Code: NEW30 to Get 30% OFF Your First Order The Essential Role of Needs Assessment in Health Promotion Planning: An Evidence-Based Guide By Public Health Practice Team | Last Updated: October 2025 | Reviewed by Board-Certified Public
For this assignment you will select a public health issue from the provided resource, “List of Public Health Topics.” In 500-750 words, address the following
For this assignment you will select a public health issue from the provided resource, “List of Public Health Topics.” In 500-750 words, address the following: The purpose of this assignment is to gain an understanding of the assignments in this class by watching the welcome video and selecting a public health issue that you will discuss in upcoming assignments. For this assignment you will select a public health issue from the provided resource, “List of Public Health Topics.” In 500-750 words, address the following: Reflect on the welcome video, “PUB-620 Public Health Project and Overview of Assignments,” located in the Topic 1 Resources. Describe two things that you learned about this course. Describe the public health issue you selected. Include who is most affected and factors that contribute to the health issue. Describe the community and region to be assessed: Your community can be defined by geography (e.g., neighborhood, city, state) or by specific population of focus (e.g., immigrants, race/ethnic group, elderly). Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance. Expert Answer and Explanation Reflection and Selection of Public Health Issue Reflection on the Welcome Video The introductory video highlights how assignments are organized to lead to a comprehensive public health project and gives a clear overview of the goals for this course. The training is very applicable and practical, emphasizing not only academic knowledge but also putting evidence into practice. This is one of the main lessons to be learned from the video. It is expected of students to choose a real-world public health problem and create a project that could be used to plan or guide community initiatives. This practical method illustrates how crucial it is to relate what is learned in the classroom to actual public health issues. The assignments’ step-by-step format, which leads students through every phase of project development, is another important takeaway from the movie. Instead of addressing the project as one major deliverable, the assignments are separated into smaller, manageable components such as needs assessments, intervention planning, and evaluation strategies. This method guarantees that students are progressively exposed to the abilities and information needed to create a successful public health project, while simultaneously offering chances for them to get feedback and improve their work as they go. Because of these characteristics, the course is both demanding and encouraging, giving students skills that they may use right away in their professional lives. Selected Public Health Issue: Type II Diabetes Type II Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), a chronic condition that presents major obstacles in both prevention and management, is the public health issue I have selected to concentrate on for this course (Wagenknecht et al., 2023). The hallmark of type 2 diabetes is the body’s ineffective use of insulin, which raises blood glucose levels and can cause serious problems like kidney failure, neuropathy, cardiovascular disease, and eyesight loss if left unchecked. With over 37 million Americans diagnosed with diabetes and millions more at risk from prediabetes, the prevalence of the disease is still on the increase in the US. Community and Region to Be Assessed Black Americans are the group most disproportionately impacted by Type II diabetes. Research continuously demonstrates that Black Americans have greater prevalence, complications, and mortality rates from diabetes than do White Americans. This discrepancy is caused by a number of reasons (Hill-Briggs et al., 2022). A major part is played by social determinants of health, which include less access to reasonably priced healthcare, a lower socioeconomic position, food insecurity, and fewer possibilities for safe physical activity. These difficulties are made worse by historical and cultural elements, such as systemic healthcare disparities and mistrust of medical systems. Furthermore, the increased incidence of diabetes in this community are a result of a combination of lifestyle risk factors such obesity, poor diet, and physical inactivity, as well as genetic predisposition (Walker et al., 2022). This focus on the Black community is particularly important because addressing diabetes in this population has the potential for broad, positive ripple effects. Conclusion This course offers the chance to develop a useful, empirically supported public health project that is based on both research and practical implementation. Given the disproportionate burden that Black Americans bear and the significance that social variables play in maintaining inequities, the problem of Type II diabetes within this group is especially critical. The project will aid in the creation of strategies that address the management of chronic diseases and advance health equity by concentrating on this group. The course’s organized methodology and hands-on application of information offer the perfect basis for creating significant and long-lasting public health solutions. References Hill-Briggs, F., Ephraim, P. L., Vrany, E. A., Davidson, K. W., Pekmezaris, R., Salas-Lopez, D., … & Gary-Webb, T. L. (2022). Social determinants of health, race, and diabetes population health improvement: Black/African Americans as a population exemplar. Current diabetes reports, 22(3), 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-022-01454-3 Wagenknecht, L. E., Lawrence, J. M., Isom, S., Jensen, E. T., Dabelea, D., Liese, A. D., … & Divers, J. (2023). Trends in incidence of youth-onset type 1 and type 2 diabetes in the USA, 2002–18: results from the population-based SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study. The lancet Diabetes & endocrinology, 11(4), 242-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(23)00025-6 Walker, A. Q., Blake, C. E., Moore, J. B., Wilcox, S., DuBois, K., & W. Watkins, K. (2022). Experiences of midlife and older African American men living with type 2 diabetes. Ethnicity & health, 27(6), 1256-1270. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2021.1910206 Place your order now on a similar assignment and get fast, cheap and best quality work written by our expert level assignment writers. Use Coupon Code: NEW30 to Get 30% OFF Your First Order How to Write a Public Health Topic Analysis: Complete Assignment Guide Understanding Your Public