This topic will focus on children and how to assess for and address their developmental needs. The Search Institute is a nonprofit organization that conducts and applies research to promote positive youth development.
This topic will focus on children and how to assess for and address their developmental needs Developmental Assessment and the School-Aged Child This topic will focus on children and how to assess for and address their developmental needs. The Search Institute is a nonprofit organization that conducts and applies research to promote positive youth development. In 1994, the Search Institute published “What Kids Need to Succeed” with 40 Developmental Assets for raising children. Please review the 40 Developmental Assets documents located in topic Resources. Based on the first letter of your first name you will create a plan using the nursing process (Assessment, Diagnosis, Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation [ADPIE]) that will focus on the given age group: A-F: 3 to 5 years – Early childhood G-M: 5 to 9 years – Children grades K-3 N-S: 9 to 12 years – Middle childhood T-Z: 12 to 18 years – Adolescents Use the attached template based on your assigned age group to successfully complete the assignment from the perspective of a nurse working at your state’s Department of Human Services. You are required to cite a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the past 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance. American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 1.1, 1.3. Expert Answer and Explanation Nursing Process: Assessment, Diagnosis, Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation (ADPIE) Assessment Summarize the relevant data obtained during your assessment about the patient’s health status, including physical, psychological, sociocultural, spiritual, and economic factors that are affecting the patient. Carlos is an 11-year-old Hispanic male in middle childhood who has experienced severe trauma, including witnessing his mother’s murder by his father, who is now incarcerated. He has since endured instability with multiple foster placements due to aggressive behaviors. Psychologically, Carlos shows signs of trauma—sullen affect, withdrawn behavior, and sleeping under his bed—indicating fear, anxiety, and potential PTSD (Yue et al., 2022). Physically, he is meeting developmental milestones and is bilingual. Socioculturally, he is isolated, separated from siblings, and lacking consistent support. Spiritually, no affiliations are noted. Economically, he depends on state support and foster care. These factors significantly impact his emotional and social development. Diagnosis Part 1. Two critical Developmental Assets that need to be addressed for Carlos are Support and Positive Identity. Carlos lacks consistent, caring relationships with adults and peers, as shown by multiple foster placements and separation from siblings. This deficiency in emotional and family support contributes to his withdrawn and aggressive behavior. Besides, Carlos has trouble with Positive Identity, which might make him feel rejected and unworthy because of what he has experienced in the past and the absence of a family. Such gaps lower his confidence, sense of direction, and hope for tomorrow. By doing this, Carlos will be valued more, feel safe, and be able to set up good goals and healthy relationships (Jankowska-Tvedten & Wiium, 2023). Part 2. Define the two components selected and describe your rationale. When children experience support, they have caring people and a steady environment where they feel appreciated (Search Institute, 1994). Self-esteem, personal strength, and purpose make up Positive Identity in a child (Search Institute, 1994). Because he lost his parents and had to move around in foster care, Carlos does not have much emotional support from anyone. It makes him doubt adults and his feelings of belonging. Because of trauma, rejection, and the feeling of having little control, his Positive Identity is probably damaged. They are important for Carlos’s development, mainly when he has recently been through trauma, helping him trust others, feel safe emotionally, and value himself. Planning Part 1. Create a plan of care for this patient taking into account their health problems and needs. The plan of care for Carlos focuses on building emotional support and fostering a positive identity. He will be referred to trauma-informed therapy to address his past trauma and learn coping strategies. A consistent daily routine will be established in the foster home to create a sense of safety (Hards et al., 2022). Carlos will be enrolled in a school-based mentorship program or extracurricular activity to encourage social engagement and build confidence. The foster parent will receive training in trauma-informed care (Hards et al., 2022). Efforts will be made to facilitate contact with his sisters to maintain family connection and support Carlos’s emotional well-being and sense of belonging. Part 2. Describe how each of the two components of the Developmental Assets identified above would be addressed; include specific examples in your recommendations and discussion. To address Support, Carlos will be connected with a consistent, caring adult through a school mentorship program and encouraged to build trust with his foster parent by establishing predictable routines and open communication. The foster parent will be guided to provide positive reinforcement and emotional availability. To promote Positive Identity, Carlos will engage in structured activities such as art or sports, allowing him to develop a sense of achievement and self-worth (Hards et al., 2022). Therapy sessions will help him process trauma and rebuild self-esteem. Reconnecting with his sisters will also reinforce his sense of identity and belonging within his family and culture. Part 3. Provide at least one community resource for each of the selected Developmental Asset components. In terms of support, Big Brothers Big Sisters of America is a good resource that carefully matches young people with adults who give them trusted mentorship and support. Having a mentor who is steady and helpful would be good for Carlos. For support on having
In this assignment you will learn about the differences between normal and abnormal lung sounds. Within the Shadow Health platform, complete the Respiratory Concept Lab. The estimated average time to complete this assignment is 25 minutes
In this assignment you will learn about the differences between normal and abnormal lung sounds. Within the Shadow Health platform, complete the Respiratory Concept Lab Shadow Health Respiratory Concept Lab In this assignment you will learn about the differences between normal and abnormal lung sounds. Within the Shadow Health platform, complete the Respiratory Concept Lab. The estimated average time to complete this assignment is 25 minutes. Please note, this is an average time. Some students may need additional time. You can attempt this assignment as many times as you would like. After completing this concept lab, you will be awarded a Student Performance Index percentage. This score will appear on your Lab Pass which you will submit to the classroom drop box. The Student Performance Index will be used as your percentage grade for this assignment. You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competency 2.3. Expert Guide and Explanation Place your order now for a similar assignment and get fast, affordable and best quality work written by our expert level assignment writers.Use Coupon: NEW30 to Get 30% OFF Your First Order How to Complete the Shadow Health Respiratory Concept Lab and Identify Normal vs Abnormal Lung Sounds The Shadow Health Respiratory Concept Lab is a critical component of digital clinical experiences for nursing and healthcare students. In this simulation, students assess lung sounds, identify normal and abnormal breath patterns, and understand the clinical implications of their findings. This comprehensive guide will help you navigate the assignment, understand the anatomy of lung sounds, and prepare effectively. Shadow Health simulations offer hands-on practice in a virtual environment, giving learners the confidence to apply their skills in real-world clinical settings. The Respiratory Concept Lab, in particular, is a cornerstone for students seeking to master the fundamentals of respiratory assessment. What is the Shadow Health Respiratory Concept Lab? The Respiratory Concept Lab is a virtual clinical experience embedded within the Shadow Health platform. It allows students to auscultate simulated patients and distinguish between normal and abnormal lung sounds across various anatomical locations. According to Dr. Emily Vargas, DNP, MSN, RN, “It’s one of the most realistic online simulations available, helping students identify adventitious lung sounds like wheezing, rhonchi, and crackles.” The lab includes: Auscultation using a virtual stethoscope Audio comparison and matching tasks Short-form reflective questions Interactive feedback and corrections Assignment Overview: What to Expect Time Required: ~25 minutes Skills Targeted: Respiratory assessment, critical thinking, diagnostic reasoning Patient Scenario: Virtual patient presenting with respiratory concerns Students will explore: Lung sound locations (anterior and posterior) Differences in breath sounds Physiological implications of abnormal findings Typical Format: Introduction to lung anatomy Step-by-step auscultation Audio recognition and matching Knowledge checks Summary reflections Understanding Normal and Abnormal Lung Sounds A strong understanding of respiratory sounds is essential in healthcare practice. Here’s a detailed table highlighting key differences: Lung Sound Type Location Clinical Relevance Vesicular Normal Peripheral lung fields Soft, low-pitched; indicates healthy lungs Bronchial Normal Over trachea Loud, high-pitched; normal centrally Bronchovesicular Normal 1st and 2nd intercostal spaces Mix of vesicular and bronchial sounds Crackles (Rales) Abnormal Any region Suggests fluid (e.g., pneumonia, CHF) Wheezes Abnormal Most often on expiration Narrowed airways (asthma, COPD) Rhonchi Abnormal Central airways Low-pitched; secretions or obstructions Stridor Abnormal Upper airway Medical emergency; airway obstruction Clinical Significance: Why This Lab Matters According to a 2023 AACN survey, over 78% of nursing students report difficulty in accurately identifying abnormal lung sounds during clinical rotations. Understanding these variations is critical not only for passing the lab but for future patient care. Accurate auscultation may be the first step in diagnosing: Asthma Bronchitis Pneumonia Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) How to Prepare for the Respiratory Concept Lab Here are tips to enhance your performance: ✅ Do This ❌ Avoid This Use headphones for better sound clarity Ignoring location-specific sounds Read each question carefully Skipping rationales for feedback Replay audio clips as needed Memorizing without understanding Take notes on pitch and duration Skimming over clinical instructions “Always listen twice — once for pitch, once for pattern,” recommends Prof. Kelvin Morris, Clinical Skills Director at Chamberlain University. Walkthrough: Step-by-Step Completion Step 1: Log into Shadow Health Navigate to https://www.shadowhealth.com, access your dashboard, and launch the Respiratory Concept Lab. Step 2: Review Anatomy Overview The lab begins with a refresher on lung zones and anatomical landmarks. This is crucial before auscultating. Step 3: Perform Auscultation Use your virtual stethoscope to listen to audio samples over 6 anterior and 6 posterior positions. Pay attention to: Timing (inspiration vs expiration) Quality (harsh, moist, dry) Presence of adventitious sounds Step 4: Match Lung Sounds to Conditions You’ll be asked to label the sounds. Common prompts include: “What does a wheeze sound like?” “Where would crackles be most audible?” Step 5: Reflect and Submit Complete the reflection section with clinical reasoning and justification. Use evidence-based terminology and tie your responses to pathophysiology. Common Mistakes to Avoid Confusing crackles with rhonchi: Listen for wetness vs coarseness Ignoring the respiratory phase: Some sounds are only present during inspiration Overreliance on volume: Soft sounds may still be pathologic “Breath sounds are not just sounds; they are the language of the lungs,” says Dr. Nina Patel, Pulmonologist at Mayo Clinic. “Students who practice with repetition and use good audio equipment tend to retain more auditory diagnostic memory,” according to Dr. Rachel Fields, NP-C, University of Maryland. Final Thoughts Completing the Shadow Health Respiratory Concept Lab successfully requires a blend of theory, attentive listening, and clinical application. With the insights provided here, you’ll not only complete your assignment with confidence but also strengthen your real-world respiratory assessment skills. Incorporate expert advice, review key terminology, and practice sound recognition to excel in this vital component of your nursing education. What are normal lung sounds? Normal lung sounds, also known as vesicular breath sounds, are the typical sounds heard when air moves in and
In this assignment you will create a 10-12 slide PowerPoint for your presentation, with speaker notes. In developing your PowerPoint, take into consideration the health literacy level of your target audience, as well as the demographics
In this assignment you will create a 10-12 slide PowerPoint for your presentation, with speaker notes. In developing your PowerPoint, take into consideration the health literacy level of your target audience You are an RN working in the Community Outreach Department at Utopia Hospital. You have been asked to give a presentation at the local Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Nutrition program for a group of 15 expectant mothers and interested partners/spouses/caregivers. The WIC Coordinator has asked you to provide a presentation that will cover relevant health and environmental safety topics the parents should know for the first year of life. In this assignment you will create a 10-12 slide PowerPoint for your presentation, with speaker notes. In developing your PowerPoint, take into consideration the health literacy level of your target audience, as well as the demographics of the expectant mothers and interested partners/spouses/caregivers (socioeconomic level, language, culture, and any other relevant characteristic of the caregiver) for which the presentation is tailored. Your presentation should be geared towards the community where you currently live taking into account local concerns that may be relevant to your presentation. Include the following in your presentation: Anticipated developmental milestones achieved in the first year of life. Safety in the home for an infant. Safety for the sleeping environment. Food and nutrition safety. When to call your pediatrician or doctor. Interventions and guidance should be supported by evidence-based sources. You are required to cite a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the past 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice. Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance. American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 2.2, 2.5, 3.1. Expert Guide and Explanation Welcome, everyone. Thank you for joining us today for this important conversation on infant health and safety during the first year of life. I’m a registered nurse with Utopia Hospital’s Community Outreach Department. Today’s session is designed for expectant mothers and caregivers in our community, and we will be focusing on the most relevant health and safety topics to support you through your baby’s first year. During the first year, babies experience rapid changes in physical, emotional, and cognitive development. By the end of this year, most infants will go from limited movement and reflexes to sitting up, crawling, and possibly walking. These milestones are indicators of healthy growth and brain development. As caregivers, observing and encouraging these milestones ensures your baby is progressing as expected (Cascio, 2021). From birth to three months, infants begin developing neck strength, tracking objects with their eyes, and responding to voices and sounds. Smiling socially and recognizing caregivers are key signs of emotional development. At this stage, tummy time is vital to help strengthen their muscles. Parents should note that if a baby seems overly floppy or unresponsive to sounds, they should notify their healthcare provider (Ertem et al., 2018). Between four and six months, most babies can roll over, reach for toys, and respond to their name. They begin to explore with their hands and mouth, which is how they learn. This is also the time when they might start sitting with support. If your baby is not showing interest in their surroundings or not making any babbling sounds, bring this up at their wellness checkup (Hannigan et al., 2023). During this stage, babies often begin crawling, pulling themselves up, and developing fine motor skills such as picking up small objects. They understand familiar words and may show stranger anxiety. It’s important to encourage learning by talking, singing, and playing. Lack of movement or poor eye contact could be early signs of developmental concerns and should be addressed with your pediatrician (Hannigan et al., 2023). Most babies begin to cruise along furniture, stand alone, and may take first steps. They imitate others and use gestures like waving. Language skills are emerging, and many can say a few simple words. If your baby isn’t babbling or is not showing interest in standing, consult with your healthcare provider for early intervention support (Hannigan et al., 2023). Infants explore their world through touch and movement, so making your home safe is critical. Secure furniture, use outlet covers, and ensure no small objects are within reach to prevent choking. Supervision is key, especially during playtime and when babies become mobile. Teach all household members about safe practices to maintain a consistent environment (Kim et al., 2025). Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) is a major concern in the first year. Infants should always sleep on their backs in a crib with a firm mattress and no loose bedding or toys. Co-sleeping should be avoided, and the room should be kept at a comfortable temperature. These steps drastically reduce the risk of sleep-related accidents (Kim et al., 2025). Start with exclusive breastfeeding or formula feeding until about six months, then slowly introduce pureed solids. Avoid foods like honey, whole nuts, and choking hazards. Always supervise during feeding, and know the signs of allergic reactions. Ensure bottles and utensils are sterilized, especially in the early months, to prevent infections (Kim et al., 2025). Call your pediatrician if your infant has a high fever, refuses to eat for several feedings, is vomiting, or is not producing enough wet diapers.
In this assignment you will be conducting a focused exam on a patient presenting with cough. Interview the patient, assess the related body systems, and then complete post-exam activities. Within the Shadow Health platform
In this assignment you will be conducting a focused exam on a patient presenting with cough. Interview the patient, assess the related body systems, and then complete post-exam activities Shadow Health: Focused Exam: Cough Results In this assignment you will be conducting a focused exam on a patient presenting with cough. Interview the patient, assess the related body systems, and then complete post-exam activities. Within the Shadow Health platform, complete the Focused Exam: Cough Results. The estimated average time to complete this assignment each time is 1 hour and 15 minutes. Please note, this is an average time. Some students may need additional time. You can attempt this assignment as many times as you would like. After completing this focused exam, you will be awarded a Digital Clinical Experience (DCE) score. The DCE score will appear on your Lab Pass which you will submit to the classroom drop box. The DCE score will be used as your percentage grade for this assignment. You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competency 2.8. Expert Guide and Explanation Place your order now for a similar assignment and get fast, affordable and best quality work written by our expert level assignment writers.Use Coupon: NEW30 to Get 30% OFF Your First Order Evidence-Based Clinical Cough Assessment: A Comprehensive Guide for Healthcare Professionals Cough is one of the most prevalent symptoms encountered in clinical practice, accounting for over 26 million office visits in the United States annually and representing the most common complaint for which patients seek medical attention. With a weighted prevalence of 5.0% for chronic cough in the United States, healthcare professionals must possess comprehensive assessment skills to effectively evaluate and manage patients presenting with this symptom. This evidence-based guide provides healthcare practitioners with current best practices for conducting thorough cough assessments, incorporating the latest clinical guidelines and research findings to ensure optimal patient care and diagnostic accuracy. Understanding Cough: Clinical Definitions and Classifications Acute vs. Chronic Cough Classification The clinical classification of cough is fundamental to proper assessment and management: Cough Type Duration Key Characteristics Primary Considerations Acute Cough < 3 weeks Often viral etiology Self-limiting, symptomatic care Subacute Cough 3-8 weeks Post-infectious or transitional May require investigation Chronic Cough > 8 weeks (adults) Persistent, complex etiology Requires comprehensive evaluation Chronic Cough (Pediatric) > 4 weeks Different threshold in children Age-specific considerations Current Medical Guidelines Recent updates to international guidelines emphasize the importance of systematic assessment approaches. Assessment of children and adults requires a focused history of chronic cough to identify any red flag cough pointers that may indicate an underlying disease, according to the Australian CICADA guidelines published in 2024. The European Respiratory Society guidelines highlight that the concept of cough hypersensitivity has allowed an umbrella term that explains the exquisite sensitivity of patients to external stimuli such a cold air, perfumes, smoke and bleach. Comprehensive Patient Interview Techniques Essential History Components A systematic approach to cough history collection includes: 1. Temporal Characteristics Onset and duration Pattern throughout the day Seasonal variations Relationship to sleep and activities 2. Cough Quality and Characteristics Dry vs. productive Sound characteristics Associated symptoms Triggers and alleviating factors 3. Associated Symptoms Assessment Dyspnea or shortness of breath Chest pain or discomfort Fever or systemic symptoms Weight loss or night sweats Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms Red Flag Symptoms Requiring Immediate Attention Healthcare professionals must remain vigilant for warning signs that indicate serious underlying pathology: Red Flag Symptom Clinical Significance Immediate Action Required Hemoptysis Possible malignancy or infection Urgent referral/imaging Significant weight loss Malignancy concern Comprehensive workup Progressive dyspnea Cardiopulmonary disease Cardiac/pulmonary evaluation Fever > 38.5°C Infectious process Antimicrobial consideration Chest pain Multiple etiologies ECG, imaging as indicated Physical Examination Protocols Respiratory System Assessment A systematic physical examination should include: 1. General Inspection Overall appearance and distress level Use of accessory muscles Positioning preferences Cyanosis or pallor 2. Chest Examination Inspection for deformities or asymmetry Palpation for tenderness or masses Percussion for dullness or hyperresonance Auscultation with focus on: Breath sound quality Adventitious sounds (crackles, wheezes, rhonchi) Vocal fremitus changes 3. Additional System Examinations Cardiovascular assessment for heart failure signs Head and neck examination for upper airway pathology Abdominal examination for hepatomegaly or ascites Diagnostic Testing Considerations Further assessment with examination should include a chest x‐ray and spirometry (when age > 6 years) according to current Australian guidelines. Evidence-Based Assessment Tools Validated Cough Assessment Scales Several validated tools assist in quantifying cough severity and impact: Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) 19-item validated instrument Assesses physical, psychological, and social domains Useful for monitoring treatment response Cough-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (CQLQ) 28-item questionnaire Evaluates impact on daily activities Reliable outcome measure for research Objective Cough Monitoring Modern technology enables objective cough assessment through: 24-hour cough monitors Smartphone-based applications Acoustic analysis systems Current Epidemiology and Statistics Global Prevalence Data Recent epidemiological studies reveal important patterns in cough presentation: Chronic cough affects 5.0% of the US population, with respondents being older and more predominantly female Chronic cough accounts for more than one-third of outpatient visits to respiratory clinics in China Complete recovery from acute cough occurs in 40.2-67% of patients after two weeks, and 79% after four weeks Recent Public Health Trends The healthcare landscape has seen significant changes in cough-related presentations: In 2024, reported cases of pertussis increased across the United States, with more than six times as many cases reported compared to 2023 Cases have risen in several countries, including Brazil, Mexico, Peru, and the United States, likely due to declined vaccination coverage during COVID-19 Expert Insights on Clinical Assessment Leading respiratory medicine experts emphasize the paradigm shift in understanding chronic cough. “Chronic cough remains a significant clinical challenge, affecting approximately 10% of the population and leading to significant impairment in psychological, social, and physical quality of life,” according to recent research published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice (Source). Dr. Alyn Morice, a leading expert in
Read the case study presented at the end of Chapter 8 (Guido, p.133) which begins, “The patient was hospitalized for extreme low back pain
Read the case study presented at the end of Chapter 8 (Guido, p.133) which begins, “The patient was hospitalized for extreme low back pain Was there informed consent for the initial medications given to the patient? How would you determine that informed consent had been given for the MRI and the medications needed for sedation for the test? Was the informed consent deficient to the degree that there was a lack of informed consent for the patient for the second dose of medications? How would you decide this case? Read the case study presented at the end of Chapter 9 (Guido, p. 150) which begins, “Jimmy, a Floridian, has undergone two liver transplants.”: What questions would you anticipate the judge to ask Jimmy to ascertain his level of maturity, understanding of the full consequences of his lack of action, and possible alternative reasons for requesting that he be allowed to make his own medical decisions? How should the judge evaluate the mother’s response to her son’s request? Does the state of residency factor into the judge’s decision? Are there additional issues that should be addressed prior to deciding the outcome of this case? How would you decide the case? Jimmy Chang, a 20- year- old college student, is admitted for additional chemotherapy. Jimmy was diagnosed with leukemia 5 years earlier and has had several courses of chemotherapy. He is currently in an acute active phase of the disease, though he had enjoyed a 14- month remission phase prior to this admission. His parents, who accompany him to the hospital, are divided as to the benefits of additional chemotherapy. His mother is adamant that she will sign the informed consent form for this course of therapy, and his father is equally adamant that he will refuse to sign the informed consent form because “Jimmy has suffered enough.” You are his primary nurse and must assist in somehow resolving this impasse. What do you do about the informed consent form? Who signs and why? Using the MORAL model, decide the best course of action for Jimmy from an ethical perspective rather than a legal perspective. Now decide the best course of action based on a purely legal perspective. Did you come to the same conclusion using both an ethical and a legal approach? Please combine all of these responses into a single Microsoft Word document for submission. Submit only completed assignments (not partial or “draft” assignments). Be thorough in your responses to adequately address all aspects of each question. Submit only the assignments corresponding to the module in this section. Assignment Expectations Length: 1500 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner. Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count towards the minimum word count for this assignment. References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least three (3) scholarly sources to support your claims. Format: Save your assignment as a Microsoft Word document (.doc or .docx). File name: Name your saved file according to your first initial, last name, and the assignment number (for example, “RHall Assignment 1.docx”) M6 Assignment UMBO – 4 M6 Assignment PLG – 4, 6 M6 Assignment CLO – 1, 2, 3, 7 The case study for Chapter 8: ” The patient was hospitalized for extreme low back pain so intense that he could not be scheduled for a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) until his fifth hospital day. His physician explained to him that the Dilaudid and Ativan he would receive the next day to numb his pain for the MRI could cause respiratory depression or arrest in patients like himself who were on high doses of opiates. The patient agreed to be given the medications. At 8:15 A.M. the next day, a nurse gave the patient the medications, but the MRI had to be postponed. With the physician’s new orders and the patient’s verbal consent, the nurse gave a second dose of the same medications at 11:30 A.M. About 5:00 P.M., the patient became stuporous. Vital signs were taken, oxygen was initiated, and Narcan was prepared for injection. At 6:00 P.M., the critical care code team was called, as the patient was in full cardiopulmonary arrest. The patient was successfully resuscitated and was discharged the next day. The patient then sued, claiming residual psychologi-cal symptoms and failure to obtain valid informed consent for the second dosage of medications administered at 11:30 A.M.” The case study for Chapter 9: “Jimmy, a 15-year-old Floridian, had undergone two liver transplants. An only child, he lived with his mother, a sin-gle parent. He was prescribed immunosuppressant drugs that caused severe debilitating side effects in an attempt to prevent his body from rejecting the second liver transplant. Understanding that his life expectancy was limited and that the medications were causing the debilitating side effects, Jimmy elected to stop taking the immunosuppressive medi-cations. When his attending physicians discovered that he was no longer taking the prescribed medications, they instituted court proceedings against his mother for child endan-germent. Jimmy was readmitted to the hospital at the same time in an attempt to ensure that he restarted the immuno-suppressive mediations.A juvenile court judge held separate meetings with Jimmy, his mother, and the health care team in an attempt to resolve the issue. His mother, at her meeting with the judge, expressed anguish as she felt that not taking the medications would hasten her son’s death, but she was also resolved to the fact that she felt he was mature enough to fully under-stand the consequences of his non-actions. Jimmy assured the judge that he understood the consequences of his non-actions, but he was tired of taking medications that merely increased his pain and suffering and wanted, as stated in his final comment, “some time to be free of pain. I am go-ing to die anyway.” The health care team were unable to assure the judge that taking the medications would greatly increase Jimmy’s longevity.” Required resources: Guido, G. W. (2020). Legal and ethical issues in nursing (7th ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN: 9780134701233. Read Chapter 8 & 9. Pozgar, G. D. (2020). Legal and ethical issues for health professionals (5th ed.). Jones and Bartlett. ISBN: 9781284144185. Read Chapters 12, 13, & 14. Expert Answer and Explanation Informed Consent This paper will give an insight into various issues surrounding informed consent. Three case studies will be used to provide context on the subject under discussion. Chapter 8 Case Study
Post a brief description of the results of your Work Environment Assessment. Based on the results, how civil is your workplace? Explain why your workplace is or is not civil. Then, describe a situation where you have experienced incivility in the workplace
Post a brief description of the results of your Work Environment Assessment. Based on the results, how civil is your workplace? Discussion: Workplace Environment Assessment How healthy is your workplace? You may think your current organization operates seamlessly, or you may feel it has many issues. You may experience or even observe things that give you pause. Yet, much as you wouldn’t try to determine the health of a patient through mere observation, you should not attempt to gauge the health of your work environment based on observation and opinion. Often, there are issues you perceive as problems that others do not; similarly, issues may run much deeper than leadership recognizes. There are many factors and measures that may impact organizational health. Among these is civility. While an organization can institute policies designed to promote such things as civility, how can it be sure these are managed effectively? In this Discussion, you will examine the use of tools in measuring workplace civility. Post a brief description of the results of your Work Environment Assessment. Based on the results, how civil is your workplace? Explain why your workplace is or is not civil. Then, describe a situation where you have experienced incivility in the workplace. How was this addressed? Be specific and provide examples. Expert Guide and Explanation Workplace Environment Assessment Analysis of the Results Analysis of the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory results reveals the variation in the civility levels, signifying unstable health of the workplace environment. This assessment considers various dimensions including the wellbeing of the staff, communication, and trust. Considering the results of the assessment, the workplace has mixed civility, with favorable outcomes seen with some dimensions, and others exhibiting unfavorable attributes. The organization scores favorably if assessed through the lens of communication and teamwork. However, it needs to improve on allocation of work, and making resources available for the staff as part of the interventions focused on making the workplace healthy. Reason for the Lack or Present of Civility The results show higher scores in a number of areas including the recognition of the employees’ efforts, and reciprocated respect, which contributes to the civility of the workplace. However, infective management of the resources, lack of trust, and unfairness compromise the health of the workplace environment by causing the loss of satisfaction with one’s job (Clark, 2019). Example of Uncivil Behavior at the Workplace Uncivil behavior that I witnessed involved a supervisor dismissing the contributions made by their juniors during a meeting held to discuss solutions to the spike in rates of patient readmissions. The supervisor frequently interjected their juniors, which made it difficult for them to contribute meaningful ideas that could help resolve the issue (McDermott, Bernard, & Hathaway, 2021). To address this issue, the organizers of the meeting reiterated the need for everyone to be given a fair chance to contribute towards finding practical solutions. The moderators adopted an approach in which they shared constructive feedback with the attendees, acknowledging their meaningful contributions. This encouraged those involved in the meeting to share their views (Lee & Miller, 2022). References Clark, C. M. (2019). Fostering A Culture Of Civility And Respect In Nursing. Links to an external site.. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 10(1), 44–52. Lee, S., & Miller, K. (2022). Developing A Diversity, Equity, And Civility Council To Advance Health Equity In Nursing Academia And Practice. Links to an external site.. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 46(3), E16–E23. McDermott, C., Bernard, N., & Hathaway, W. (2021). Taking a stand against workplace incivility. Links to an external site.. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 52(5), 232–239. Place your order now for a similar assignment and get fast, cheap and best quality work written by our expert level assignment writers.Use Coupon: NEW30 to Get 30% OFF Your First Order The Complete Guide to Workplace Environment Assessment: Evaluating and Improving Workplace Civility A workplace environment assessment is a systematic evaluation tool that measures various aspects of organizational culture, employee satisfaction, and workplace civility. Understanding how to conduct and interpret these assessments is crucial for creating healthier, more productive work environments that foster respect, collaboration, and professional growth. What Is a Workplace Environment Assessment? A workplace environment assessment is a comprehensive evaluation process that examines the physical, psychological, and social aspects of a work environment. These assessments typically measure factors such as communication patterns, leadership effectiveness, workplace civility, employee engagement, and overall organizational health. The primary purpose of conducting a workplace environment assessment is to identify strengths and weaknesses within an organization’s culture and provide actionable insights for improvement. This process helps organizations understand how civil their workplace is and what factors contribute to or detract from a positive work environment. Understanding Workplace Civility Workplace civility refers to the basic level of respect, courtesy, and consideration that employees show toward one another in professional settings. A civil workplace is characterized by polite interactions, respectful communication, collaborative problem-solving, and mutual support among team members. Key Components of Workplace Civility Respectful Communication: Employees engage in professional dialogue, listen actively to colleagues, and express disagreements constructively without personal attacks or dismissive behavior. Inclusive Behavior: Team members demonstrate cultural sensitivity, welcome diverse perspectives, and ensure all voices are heard during meetings and decision-making processes. Professional Courtesy: Workers maintain appropriate boundaries, show consideration for others’ time and workload, and demonstrate basic etiquette in both face-to-face and digital communications. Conflict Resolution: When disagreements arise, employees address issues directly with the involved parties rather than engaging in gossip or undermining behavior. Common Workplace Environment Assessment Tools Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory The Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory is one of the most widely used workplace environment assessment tools. This instrument evaluates various dimensions of workplace health and provides scores that help organizations understand their current state. Score Range Classification Characteristics 90-100 Very Healthy Excellent communication, strong leadership, high trust 80-89 Healthy Good collaboration, effective management, positive culture 70-79 Moderately Healthy Some areas for improvement, mixed feedback 60-69 Barely Healthy Significant concerns, inconsistent practices Below 60 Unhealthy Major issues requiring immediate attention Other Assessment Methods Employee Engagement Surveys: Comprehensive questionnaires that measure
Clearly, diagnosis is a critical aspect of healthcare. However, the ultimate purpose of a diagnosis is the development and application of a series of treatments or protocols. Isolated recognition of a health issue does little to resolve it
Clearly, diagnosis is a critical aspect of healthcare. However, the ultimate purpose of a diagnosis is the development and application of a series of treatments or protocols. Assignment: Workplace Environment Assessment Clearly, diagnosis is a critical aspect of healthcare. However, the ultimate purpose of a diagnosis is the development and application of a series of treatments or protocols. Isolated recognition of a health issue does little to resolve it. In this module’s Discussion, you applied the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory to diagnose potential problems with the civility of your organization. In this Portfolio Assignment, you will continue to analyze the results and apply published research to the development of a proposed treatment for any issues uncovered by the assessment. To Prepare: Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015). Review the Work Environment Assessment Template. Reflect on the output of your Discussion post regarding your evaluation of workplace civility and the feedback received from colleagues. Select and review one or more of the following articles found in the Resources: Clark, Olender, Cardoni, and Kenski (2011) Clark (2018) Clark (2015) Griffin and Clark (2014) The Assignment (3-6 pages total): Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages) Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion. Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace. Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed. Explain what the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace. Part 2: Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages) Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected. Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment. Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples. Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages) Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment. Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment. Expert Answer and Explanation Work Environment Assessment Summary of Results – Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory From the Clarks healthy workplace inventory, the results indicated that my workplace is very healthy with a score of 81 according to the inventory ratings (Clark, 2015). Some of the key features that ranked highly included appreciation of collective achievement, teamwork and collaboration, fair and respectful treatment of employees to list a few. The attributes that seemed lacking according to the inventory were improvement of organization culture, a comprehensive mentoring program for all employees, and allocation of adequate resources for professional growth and development. The results from the inventory had most of the items reviewed in the 4 scores (somewhat true). Identify two things that surprised you about the results. Also, identify one idea that you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed. Before taking the inventory, I was quite sure that my workplace environment was quite healthy but on carrying out the inventory, I found it surprising that some key areas were seemingly lacking which I never considered in my earlier assumption. I also found it surprising that. I was also surprised to find several key areas that could be improved from an organizational standpoint that I would have otherwise overlooked, which are essential in the development of a healthy work environment. what might seemingly seem as a flawless workplace environment may actually have some areas that stain the health of the workplace environment. However, the results confirmed my belief in the health status of my workplace environment which I considered as being favorable. What do the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace? The results indicate that the environment I work in is quite favorable and civil but with some room for improvement. It also shows that the civility experienced is a result of mutual respect for one another and the organizational policies in place that do not tolerate incivility. Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected. Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment. The theory highlighted in an article by Clark (2015) highlights the aspect of encouraging open communication and conversations within the workplace as a way of developing a healthy and civil environment. The article reiterates that many nurses often fail to engage with uncivil colleagues at times when candid conversations are needed. Others often fail to express their concern of incivility especially when expressed by someone with a higher authority, and such cases at times can prove detrimental to patient outcomes. Therefore, the article provides different models that can be used to promote such candid conversations in a civil and respectful manner and one such model is the DESC model. This model focuses on describing the situation, explaining the concerns, stating the available alternative solutions and indicating the consequences. The model facilitates nurse engagement in a professional and civil manner. The theory focuses on the aspect of collaboration and respectful interprofessional engagement. These are some of the features which I considered to be strongly embraced in my workplace. Having a workplace culture that embraces high collaboration between teams requires employees to constantly engage with one another, even amidst their disagreements (Marshall & Broome, 2017). Such a workplace goes in accordance with the article’s view on the importance of healthy and respectful conversations in promoting a civil and safe workplace environment Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples. The organization can use the DESC model to solve differences in opinions
For this task, you will assess your personal leadership effectiveness using emotional intelligence, leadership skills, and character strengths. You will complete three self-assessments for this task: 360° Refined™ Leadership Test
For this task, you will assess your personal leadership effectiveness using emotional intelligence, leadership skills, and character strengths. MAM1 — MAM1 Task 1: Personal Leadership Assessment and Profile Competencies 3005.1.1 : Theories of Leadership and Personal Development Style The graduate evaluates theories of leadership as they relate to personal leadership development and effectiveness. Introduction For this task, you will assess your personal leadership effectiveness using emotional intelligence, leadership skills, and character strengths. You will complete three self-assessments for this task: 360° Refined™ Leadership Test, CQ Pro Assessment, and VIA Character Strengths Survey. Additionally, you will write a paper assessing and explaining your results of the three assessments and your own leadership effectiveness using a scholarly leadership theory. Finally, to help you develop as a leader, you will create a personal leadership profile. Requirements Your submission must represent your original work and understanding of the course material. Most performance assessment submissions are automatically scanned through the WGU similarity checker. Students are strongly encouraged to wait for the similarity report to generate after uploading their work and then review it to ensure Academic Authenticity guidelines are met before submitting the file for evaluation. See Understanding Similarity Reports for more information. Grammarly Note: Professional Communication will be automatically assessed through Grammarly for Education in most performance assessments before a student submits work for evaluation. Students are strongly encouraged to review the Grammarly for Education feedback prior to submitting work for evaluation, as the overall submission will not pass without this aspect passing. See Use Grammarly for Education Effectively for more information. Microsoft Files Note: Write your paper in Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) unless another Microsoft product, or pdf, is specified in the task directions. Tasks may not be submitted as cloud links, such as links to Google Docs, Google Slides, OneDrive, etc. All supporting documentation, such as screenshots and proof of experience, should be collected in a pdf file and submitted separately from the main file. For more information, please see Computer System and Technology Requirements. You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course. A. Upload a completed copy of the results for each of the following self-assessments: 360° Refined™ Leadership Test CQ Pro Assessment VIA Character Strengths Survey Note: Once you have completed each self-assessment, you will need to submit your results as an attachment with your Task 1 submission. After completing the self-assessment, download a copy of each of your three self-assessment reports and upload them from a computer. Refer to the “C203 Self-Assessment Instructions” document in the Web Links section for additional information on accessing each self-assessment. B. Write a paper (suggested length of 10–15 pages) by doing the following: Explain how your perceived leadership effectiveness is supported by the results of each of the three assessments (360° Refined™, CQ Pro, VIA Character Strengths). Choose and summarize one of the following scholarly leadership theories to evaluate your perceived effectiveness as a leader: transformational leadership transactional leadership situational leadership participative leadership servant leadership behavioral leadership trait theory of leadership a. Analyze how the chosen leadership theory aligns with the 360° Refined™ Leadership Test results, including the top categorical result and the bottom categorical result. Support your analysis with a scholarly source. Note: A scholarly source is written by an expert for an audience of other experts, researchers, or students. Additionally, you may cite other reputable editor-reviewed articles and books. A reputable source is defined as an article from a respected industry publication, government organization, educational institution, or industry leader. These can be found in the WGU Library or within the course. b. Analyze how the chosen leadership theory aligns with the CQ Pro Assessment results, including the top categorical result and the bottom categorical result. Support your analysis with a scholarly source. c. Analyze how the chosen leadership theory aligns with the VIA Character Strengths Survey results, including the top categorical result and the bottom categorical result. Support your analysis with a scholarly source. d. Recommend three action items to improve the perceived effectiveness of your leadership based on the results of the self-assessments (360° Refined™, CQ Pro, VIA Character Strengths) and explain how each action item would improve your leadership effectiveness. i. Explain how your chosen leadership theory supports the recommended action items. Support your explanation with a scholarly source. C. Develop a leadership profile based on the results of the three self-assessments that you completed in this course (360° Refined™, CQ Pro, VIA Character Strengths) and the CliftonStrengths Assessment. Include each of the following components: student name and current contact information education and credentials personal leadership philosophy, vision, and values leadership strengths leadership competencies and skills areas for leadership improvement leadership experiences and application Note: Refer to the “C203 Self-Assessment Instructions” document in the Web Links section for specific instructions on how to access the CliftonStrengths Assessment that you completed in C200. If you have not completed C200, please follow the instructions within that same document to complete the CliftonStrengths Assessment. D. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. E. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission. File Restrictions File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( ) File size limit: 200 MB File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, csv, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z Expert Answer and Explanation Personal Leadership Assessment and Profile Effective leadership requires a deep understanding of one’s strengths, weaknesses, and capacity to influence others meaningfully (Dugan, 2024). Leaders must constantly evaluate and improve their skills in the dynamic fields of healthcare and professional practice. The 360° RefinedTM Leadership Assessment, the CQ Pro Cultural Intelligence Assessment, and the VIA Character Strengths Survey are three thorough self-assessment instruments used in this study to examine perceived leadership effectiveness. When combined, these resources offer a multifaceted perspective on the leadership behaviors, cultural flexibility, and inherent personal qualities that affect communication, team dynamics, and decision-making (Dugan, 2024).. The information gleaned from each evaluation provides a basis for examining my leadership
Discuss the role of translational research in advancing equitable access to health care and preventative services and policies based on population health.
Discuss the role of translational research in advancing equitable access to health care and preventative services and policies based on population health. Provide an example of a local health care policy that has been recently enacted and or is awaiting legislative passage that has been influenced by research. The Role of Translational Research in Advancing Equitable Access to Health Care and Preventive Services Translational research entails applying an intervention, discovered through a preclinical study or lab experiment, to the clinical practice with focus on improving patient or population health outcomes. This implies that translational research involves actualizing the discoveries by replicating them in clinical settings, which essentially contributes to addressing Social Determinants of Health (SDOH). A key aspect of this kind of research is that involves a spectrum of activities focused on identifying potent interventions and using them to improve population health outcomes (Silberberg, 2023). From the initial point of discovery of an intervention to its implementation, translational research supports the development of targeted interventions, and informs intervention standards. The effectiveness of the translational research is seen in a scenario in which a clinician intends to implement targeted interventions by relying on the translational research that reveals disparity in patients’ access to care. For instance, a provider may rely on the results of a study that indicate that being Native Americans is associated with heightened risk of cardiovascular disorder, to prepare preventive intervention plan that is consistent with the Native Americans’ culture. Recently Enacted Local Health Policy Influenced by Research Colorado adopted a policy that seeks to reduce harmful effects of opioids to combat the opioid crisis. The state adopted the policy informed by translational research from Denver Health and academic centers which demonstrated that interventions such as distribution of naloxone translated to the reduction in incidences of opioid-related deaths. The translational research that informed the policy also showed that providing testing strips for fentanyl and supervised consumption sites led to the decline in opioid overdose (Salisbury-Afshar, Livingston, & Bluthenthal, 2024). References Salisbury-Afshar, E., Livingston, C. J., & Bluthenthal, R. N. (2024). How Should Harm Reduction Be Included in Care Continua for Patients With Opioid Use Disorder? AMA Journal of Ethics, 26(7), E562–E571. https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2024.562. Silberberg, M. (2023). Research translation: A Pathway for Health Inequity. Clinical and Translational Science, 16(2), 179–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.13443. As an advanced registered nurse, discuss your future role in advocating for equitable population health services and policies. Do you anticipate any challenges or barriers to “population advocacy”? How would you meet these challenges? Future Advocacy Role As an Advanced Registered Nurse (ARN), my advocacy role will involve educating patients and communities on how to manage their health needs, reduce their risks of developing diseases, and navigate the available health promotion resources. In this capacity, I plan on engaging policy makers, and share with them research findings pertaining to the effectiveness of specific interventions on population health outcomes. Grounding my arguments on research studies that demonstrate the effectiveness of interventions like providing fentanyl strips as part of the opioid harm reduction interventions, for instance, I would recommend the inclusion of this intervention in policy development. In addition, my role as patient advocate would take the form of using data to determine health disparities and develop targeted interventions to address these disparities (Chiu et al., 2021). Anticipated Challenges to Population Advocacy Patient advocacy can be challenging, and from a personal standpoint, I anticipate to experience barriers to population advocacy. The challenge that I see myself experiencing is cultural miscommunication where the cultural beliefs of a particular community clash with mine, resulting to misinterpretation of messages and cultural misunderstandings (Salla et al., 2023). For instance, failing to consider the learning style that a particular cultural group identifies with may hamper advocacy through education. I also expect to receive limited support from colleagues especially if they have political interests that are in conflict with my interests as an advocate. This is likely to happen if I pursue a collective action approach when colleagues do not approve this method. Meeting the Challenges To meet the identified challenges, I intend to take advantage of existing training opportunities on cultural competence to improve my cultural competence skills. Participating in a training program of this nature will broaden my understanding on how to communicate with individuals from other cultures. I also intend to win support from colleagues by explaining the reason for adopting a particular advocacy strategy. References Chiu, P., Cummings, G. G., Thorne, S., & Schick-Makaroff, K. (2021). Policy Advocacy and Nursing Organizations: A Scoping Review. Policy, politics & nursing practice, 22(4), 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/15271544211050611. Salla, A., Newbigging, K., Joseph, D., & Eneje, E. (2023). A Conceptual Framework for Culturally Appropriate Advocacy With Racialised Groups. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1173591. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1173591. Place your order now for a similar assignment and get fast, cheap and best quality work written by our expert level assignment writers.Use Coupon Code: NEW30 to Get 30% OFF Your First Order The Role of Translational Research in Advancing Equitable Access to Healthcare: From Evidence to Policy Implementation Translational research serves as a critical bridge between scientific discovery and real-world healthcare improvements, particularly in addressing persistent health disparities across diverse populations. As healthcare systems worldwide grapple with unequal access to quality care and preventative services, the importance of translational research in developing evidence-based policies has never been more apparent. This comprehensive analysis examines how translational research advances health equity, explores successful policy implementations, and provides concrete examples of research-driven healthcare policies that are transforming community health outcomes. Understanding Translational Research in Health Equity Context Defining Translational Research Translational research, also known as translation science, encompasses the systematic process of moving scientific discoveries from laboratory bench to community bedside and beyond. The National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) defines this approach as research that transforms scientific discoveries arising from laboratory, clinical, or population studies into clinical applications, policy implementations, or broader community interventions. The Translational Research Spectrum Translation Phase Focus Area Timeline Key Outcomes T1 Translation Basic to Clinical 2-5 years Clinical trials, biomarker development T2 Translation Clinical to
Based on the PICOT you developed for NUR-550, summarize the intervention you are proposing. How does this support the population of focus, your setting, and role?
Based on the PICOT you developed for NUR-550, summarize the intervention you are proposing. How does this support the population of focus, your setting, and role? Justify how the problem you selected to investigate is amenable to a research-based intervention using the PICOT format. Include your PICOT statement with your response PICOT Intervention Overview Using medical cannabis instead of opioid drugs to treat chronic non-cancer pain in adults is the suggested intervention based on the PICOT question. This strategy prioritizes lowering opioid dependence while improving pain management results and limiting unfavorable side effects. According to research, medical cannabis works by interacting with endocannabinoid receptors to produce analgesic benefits without the substantial risk of opioid dependence or overdose (MacCallum et al., 2021). Adults with chronic pain who are more likely to experience opioid-related problems are supported by the suggested intervention. A patient-centered and possibly safer approach is provided by the introduction of medical cannabis as a first-line or adjunct treatment in clinical settings, particularly outpatient and pain management clinics. Advocating for evidence-based alternatives promotes clinical safety and comprehensive treatment as a prospective Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP). The issue of chronic pain management is particularly suited to research-based intervention due to its widespread prevalence, complex treatment needs, and the public health burden of opioid misuse. The PICOT format provides a clear framework for evaluating how medical cannabis compares to traditional opioid therapy in achieving pain control and minimizing side effects. This structured question supports targeted data collection and outcome assessment in clinical trials or quality improvement studies (Greis et al., 2022). When the concern is able to be addressed through the use of the research lens, clinicians can generate actionable evidence to inform prescribing practices, improve quality of life for chronic pain sufferers, and contribute to more sustainable pain management models. PICOT Statement: In adults with chronic non-cancer pain (P), how does the use of medical cannabis (I) compared to opioids (C) affect pain relief and adverse side effects (O) during the treatment period (T)? References Greis, A., Larsen, E., Liu, C., Renslo, B., Radakrishnan, A., & Wilson-Poe, A. R. (2022). Perceived efficacy, reduced prescription drug use, and minimal side effects of cannabis in patients with chronic orthopedic pain. Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, 7(6), 865–875. https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2021.0088 MacCallum, C. A., Eadie, L., Barr, A. M., Boivin, M., & Lu, S. (2021). Practical strategies using medical cannabis to reduce harms associated with long-term opioid use in chronic pain. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 12, 633168. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.633168 Explain the importance of a “spirit of inquiry” in an evidence-based culture and what you can do as an advanced registered nurse to encourage this within your practice or organization. Compare the role and implementation of EBP in your specialty area with another advanced registered nurse specialty. Spirit of Inquiry in Evidence-Based Practice A “spirit of inquiry” is essential to establishing and maintaining a culture of evidence-based practice (EBP). It entails a way of thinking that actively challenges accepted wisdom and looks for better, empirically backed ways to enhance patient outcomes. Healthcare workers are more inclined to question established procedures, seek out new information, and challenge established practices in an atmosphere that values inquiry (Anderson et al., 2022). Promoting this culture as an advanced registered nurse starts with setting an example of curiosity, taking part in clinical research, and helping colleagues evaluate and use evidence. Practical strategies to integrate inquiry into everyday routines and decision-making include facilitating journal clubs, including frequent EBP talks into team meetings, and spearheading quality improvement projects. EBP is widely used in primary care settings by Family Nurse Practitioners (FNPs), who must rely on the most recent research and guidelines to manage chronic conditions, encourage preventative care, and make medication decisions. In order to improve therapeutic pathways for the management of diabetes, hypertension, and mental health screening, the FNP frequently starts EBP projects. A Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioner (PMHNP), on the other hand, might apply EBP in relation to behavioral therapies, therapy modalities, and psychopharmacology (Makic, 2025). Although both positions employ EBP to improve patient care, the PMHNP uses evidence to promote mental and emotional health, while the FNP concentrates more on physical health issues. Notwithstanding these distinctions, both specialties need a strong spirit of inquiry to guarantee that optimal practices are applied to a variety of patient populations. References Anderson, J., Dineen‐Griffin, S., & Stanley, D. (2022). Creating a Spirit of Enquiry (Enhancing Research). Clinical Leadership in Nursing and Healthcare, 303-321. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119869375.ch14 Makic, M. B. F. (2025). Fostering a Spirit of Inquiry: Inspiring Nurses to Advance Practice Based on Best Evidence. American Journal of Critical Care, 34(4), 255-265. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2025493 Place your order now for a similar assignment and get fast, cheap and best quality work written by our expert level assignment writers.Use Coupon Code: NEW30 to Get 30% OFF Your First Order How to Summarize Your NUR-550 PICOT Intervention: A Step-by-Step Guide When developing your NUR-550 assignment, creating a comprehensive intervention summary based on your PICOT framework is crucial for demonstrating evidence-based practice competency. This guide provides structured approaches to effectively communicate your proposed intervention while addressing population focus, setting considerations, and professional role alignment. Understanding PICOT Intervention Components The PICOT format (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Time) serves as the foundation for your intervention summary. Your intervention summary should clearly articulate how your proposed solution addresses the identified clinical problem while remaining feasible within your specified healthcare setting. PICOT Component Key Considerations for Intervention Summary Population (P) Demographics, clinical characteristics, risk factors Intervention (I) Evidence-based solution, implementation methods, resources needed Comparison (C) Current practice, alternative interventions, control groups Outcome (O) Measurable results, patient benefits, quality indicators Time (T) Implementation timeline, follow-up periods, evaluation intervals Supporting Your Population of Focus Your intervention summary must demonstrate clear alignment between your proposed solution and the specific population characteristics identified in your PICOT statement. Consider these evidence-based approaches: Population-Specific Intervention Design: Pediatric populations require family-centered approaches with age-appropriate communication strategies Geriatric populations benefit from multidisciplinary interventions addressing comorbidities and functional decline Chronic disease populations need long-term sustainability and self-management support components