In this assignment you will write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of two quantitative research studies.
Use the practice problem and two quantitative, peer-reviewed research articles you identified in the Topic 1 assignment (or two new articles based on instructor feedback in Topic 1) to complete this assignment.
In a 1,000–1,250-word essay, summarize two quantitative studies.
Use the “Research Critique Guidelines – Part II” document to organize your essay.
You are required to cite a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Research Critique Guidelines – Part II
Quantitative Studies
Introduction
- Introduce your nursing practice problem and discuss the purpose of your paper.
- State your PICOT question.
Background of Studies
- Summary of studies including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research question.
How Do These Two Articles Support the Nursing Practice Problem You Chose?
- Discuss how these two articles will be used to answer your PICOT question.
- Describe how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in your PICOT question.
Method of Studies
- State the methods of the two articles you are comparing and describe how they are different.
- State one benefit and one limitation of each method you have identified.
Results of Studies
Expert Answer and Explanation
Research Critique Guidelines – Part II
Quantitative Studies
Introduction
The project focuses on the issue of obesity and the nursing practice problem for this project since it affects a wide range of the adult population. Healthcare provides services to different patients, and each present with a different issue altogether. Obesity is a key issue in healthcare since it provides different issues to the care provider and undermines the efficiency of care. Obesity increases susceptibility to diseases and reduces the quality of life.
Just like aging, and economic standpoints, obesity can be a risk factor for diseases and other forms of health factors. The susceptibility to disease from obesity increases with increase in age. Obesity and overweight are among the leading causes of many health problems, such as the occurrence of stroke and other forms of the disease. There are numerous complications that come with obesity, the most common including the buildup of fat in blood vessels, stroke, and heart attacks.
Obesity interferes with the quality of life in different ways. To begin with, obesity makes it difficult for a person to lead a normal life. For instance, a person might encounter challenges with walking or climbing a flight of stairs. The inability to perform basic functions is a major concern for the health of a person. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the two quantitative research on that focus on the issues of obesity among elderly patients.
PICOT Question: In non-Hispanic black adults aged 40-55 with BMI of 30 and above (P), does physical activity five days a week (I) compared to no practice (C) reduces BMI scale (O) in eight weeks (T)?
Background of Studies
The first quantitative study identified to address the issue of obesity among adults is the study by Dieli-Conwright et al. (2018). The article focuses on how care for breast cancer survivors can use aerobic and resistance exercise to improve physical fitness, bone health, and quality of life. The article contends that physical activity is the main treatment option for obese and overweight individuals that are looking to shed weight. The article makes use of a randomized controlled trial to help improve the outcome of care for obese and overweight patients.
The identified problem in the article is the issue of obesity and overweight among cancer patients. The article is significant to the nursing profession as it offers evidence-based recommendations on proper physical activity for obese or overweight cancer survivors. The overall purpose of this trial was to compare a 16-week supervised moderate-vigorous intensity aerobic and resistance exercise intervention to usual care in physically inactive, overweight, and obese breast cancer survivors.
The objective was to analyze the efficiency of aerobic and resistance exercises as forms of physical exercise to combat obesity. The research question used in the article is, “What is the impact of moderate-vigorous intensity and resistance exercise intervention aerobic in physically inactive, overweight, and obese breast cancer survivors?”
The second article that focuses on the PICOT question is by Abdelbasset et al. (2019). The study provides insights on how an 8-week high-intensity interval exercise on intrahepatic triglycerides, visceral lipids, and health-related quality of life in diabetic obese patients. The identified problem focuses on how obesity is a major issue in society and can be mitigated through the use of physical activity.
The article is significant to nursing as it creates a mean sin that nurses can use to help obese patients to overcome their weight issues. The purpose and objective of the study are to help create an effective strategy that can be sued to help treat obese patients using physical activity as the basis of care. The research question from the article is, “What are the effectiveness of 8-week high-intensity interval exercise on intrahepatic triglycerides (IHTG), visceral lipids, and HRQoL in diabetic obese patients with NAFLD?”
How Do These Two Articles Support the Nursing Practice Problem You Chose?
The two articles provide answers to the PICOT question as they both focus on the efficiency of physical activity as a means to mitigate obesity. The articles identify how different forms of physical activity can be used to mitigate obesity and lead to the desired outcome. The PICOT question is based on the intervention that the use of physical activity can help with managing obesity. Based on the articles, the intervention groups that made use of physical activities demonstrated a positive outcome when they lost a significant amount of weight.
Method of Studies
To begin with, the article by Dieli-Conwright et al. (2018) used quantitative research using a randomized control trial design. On the other hand, the research by Abdelbasset et al. (2019) makes use of quantitative-based research based on randomized control trials to implement the proposed intervention.
The method is essential for providing a comparison between the intervention and the control groups (Booth & Tannock, 2014). The method also enables the researcher to collect information that varies from the different patient populations. Randomization makes it possible for the researcher to acquire accurate results that can be generalized to the population.
The use of randomized controlled trials (RCT) is beneficial as it helps the researcher measure the efficiency of the intervention. The method reduces bias and helps to provide a tool for analysis of cause-and-effect relations. The limitation of the RCT model is that it provides a number of restrictions to interventions that are supposed to be providing positive effects (Booth & Tannock, 2014). The methods take time to complete, and the researcher needs to be conversant with statistical calculations of inferences and correlations.
Results of Studies
Both studies depict that the use of physical activity can help obese patients lose weight and maintain a good quality of life. Those who participated in physical activity for both articles demonstrated a significant reduction in BMI. The articles imply that the nursing practice can recommend physical activity to obese patients and help with weight loss.
Ethical Considerations
The two main ethical considerations in conducting research include informed consent and maintaining confidentiality. The two articles managed to ensure the ethical considerations were met by informing the participants of the research and maintaining their confidentiality during and after the duration of the study.
The researchers adhered to the ethical standards and provided the respondents with proper informed consent, which helped with the overall outcome of the studies. The methods are efficient as they help improve the efficiency of care and coordination of the respondents and ensure the research meets the standard of practice.
Conclusion
The purpose of this paper was to analyze the two quantitative research on that focus on the issues of obesity among elderly patients. Understanding research makes it easier for nurses to provide patient-centered care and help respond to the PICOT question. The question can help guide the nurse to identify appropriate resources that can then be used as evidence to address the nursing problem.
References
Abdelbasset, W. K., Tantawy, S. A., Kamel, D. M., Alqahtani, B. A., & Soliman, G. S. (2019). A randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of 8-week high-intensity interval exercise on intrahepatic triglycerides, visceral lipids, and health-related quality of life in diabetic obese patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Medicine, 98(12), e14918. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014918
Booth, C. M., & Tannock, I. F. (2014). Randomized controlled trials and population-based observational research: partners in the evolution of medical evidence. British journal of cancer, 110(3), 551-555.
Dieli-Conwright, C. M., Courneya, K. S., Demark-Wahnefried, W., Sami, N., Lee, K., Sweeney, F. C., & Mortimer, J. E. (2018). Aerobic and resistance exercise improves physical fitness, bone health, and quality of life in overweight and obese breast cancer survivors: A randomized controlled trial. Breast Cancer Research, 20(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-018-1051-6
Place your order now for a similar assignment and get fast, cheap and best quality work written by our expert level assignment writers.
Use Coupon Code: NEW30 to Get 30% OFF Your First Order
Rubric Criteria
Criterion | 1. Unsatisfactory | 2. Insufficient | 3. Approaching | 4. Acceptable | 5. Target |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quantitative Studies Quantitative Studies | 0 points Only one article is presented. Neither of the articles presented use quantitative research. | 7.13 points Two articles are presented. Of the articles presented, only one article is based on quantitative research. | 7.51 points N/A | 8.46 points N/A | 9.5 points Two articles are presented. Both articles are based on quantitative research. |
Introduction of Nursing Practice Problem, Purpose and Picot Question Introduction of Nursing Practice Problem, Purpose and Picot Question | 0 points Introduction of the nursing practice problem, purpose of the essay, or PICOT question is not included. | 7.13 points Introduction does not include a clear description of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay. The PICOT question is not clearly written and is missing some of the necessary elements. | 7.51 points Introduction includes a basic description of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay. The PICOT question is present. | 8.46 points Introduction includes the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay in a clear manner. The PICOT question is clear and includes all elements. | 9.5 points Introduction includes the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay in a comprehensive manner. The PICOT question is concise, accurately written, and includes all elements. |
Background of Studies Background of Studies | 0 points Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is not included. | 7.13 points Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is not clearly written and lacks information. | 7.51 points Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. | 8.46 points Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details. | 9.5 points Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and an extensive explanation. |
Articles Support of Nursing Practice Problem Articles Support of Nursing Practice Problem | 0 points A discussion on how articles support the PICOT question and how the interventions and comparison groups compare to those identified in the PICOT question is not included. | 18.53 points A discussion on how articles support the PICOT question and how the interventions and comparison groups compare to those identified in the PICOT question is unclear or lacking information. | 19.51 points A discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate general support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles generally compare to those identified in the PICOT question. | 21.98 points A discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. | 24.7 points A thorough discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate strong support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles strongly compare to those identified in the PICOT question. |
Method of Studies Method of Studies | 0 points A discussion on the method of study for each article is not included. | 19.95 points A partial discussion on the method of study for each article and the comparison of study methods is presented. A benefit and a limitation of each method are omitted or incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies. | 21.01 points A general discussion on the method of study for each article and the comparison of study methods is presented. A benefit and a limitation of each method are included but the description is general. | 23.67 points A detailed discussion on the method of study for each article and the comparison of study methods is presented. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. | 26.6 points A thorough discussion on the method of study for each article and the comparison of study methods is presented. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. The discussion demonstrates a solid understanding of research methods. |
Results of Studies Results of Studies | 0 points A discussion of the results of each study, including key findings and implications for nursing practice, is not included. | 19.95 points A discussion of the results of each study, including key findings and implications for nursing practice, is unclear and incomplete. | 21.01 points A general discussion of the results of each study, including key findings and implications for nursing practice, is included. | 23.67 points A discussion of the results of each study, including key findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and supporting explanation. | 26.6 points A discussion of the results of each study, including key findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. |
Ethical Considerations Ethical Considerations | 0 points Ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is not included. Discussion of how the researchers accounted for ethical considerations is not included. | 19.95 points Ethical considerations when conducting nursing research unclear. Discussion of how the researchers accounted for ethical considerations is incomplete. | 21.01 points Ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is discussed in basic manner. Discussion of how the researchers accounted for ethical considerations is included. | 23.67 points Ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is clearly discussed. Discussion of how the researchers accounted for ethical considerations is through. | 26.6 points Ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is comprehensively discussed. Discussion of how the researchers accounted for ethical considerations is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. |
Thesis, Position, or Purpose Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience. | 0 points The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident. | 9.98 points The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience. | 10.51 points The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience. | 11.84 points The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated. | 13.3 points The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience. |
Development, Structure, and Conclusion Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development. | 0 points No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered. | 9.98 points Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose. | 10.51 points Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose. | 11.84 points The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. | 13.3 points The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. |
Evidence Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives. | 0 points Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer. | 8.55 points Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect. | 9.01 points Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present. | 10.15 points Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used. | 11.4 points Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered. |
Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc. | 0 points Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout. | 8.55 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent. | 9.01 points Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted. | 10.15 points Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used. | 11.4 points No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout. |
Format/Documentation Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline. | 0 points Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided. | 5.7 points Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident. | 6 points Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors. | 6.76 points Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors. | 7.6 points No errors in formatting or documentation are present. |
