Use the Agenda Comparison Grid Template found in the Learning Resources and complete the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid based on the current/sitting U.S.
Use the Agenda Comparison Grid Template found in the Learning Resources and It may seem to you that healthcare has been a national topic of debate among political leaders for as long as you can remember. Healthcare has been a policy item and a topic of debate not only in recent times but as far back as the administration of the second U.S. president, John Adams. In 1798, Adams signed legislation requiring that 20 cents per month of a sailor’s paycheck be set aside for covering their medical bills. This represented the first major piece of U.S. healthcare legislation, and the topic of healthcare has been woven into presidential agendas and political debate ever since. As a healthcare professional, you may be called upon to provide expertise, guidance and/or opinions on healthcare matters as they are debated for inclusion into new policy. You may also be involved in planning new organizational policy and responses to changes in legislation. For all of these reasons you should be prepared to speak to national healthcare issues making the news. In this Assignment, you will analyze recent presidential healthcare agendas. You also will prepare a fact sheet to communicate the importance of a healthcare issue and the impact on this issue of recent or proposed policy. To Prepare: Review the agenda priorities of the current/sitting U.S. president and at least one previous presidential administration. Select an issue related to healthcare that was addressed by two U.S. presidential administrations (current and previous). Consider how you would communicate the importance of a healthcare issue to a legislator/policymaker or a member of their staff for inclusion on an agenda. Use your Week 1 Discussion post to help with this assignment. The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Comparison Grid, 1-Page Analysis, and 1-page narrative) with a title page. This is an APA paper. Use 2-3 course resources and at least 2 outside resources. Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid Use the Agenda Comparison Grid Template found in the Learning Resources and complete the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid based on the current/sitting U.S. president and the previous president, and their agendas related to the population health concern you selected. Be sure to address the following: Identify and provide a brief description of the population health concern you selected. Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. Identify the allocation of resources that the presidents dedicated to this issue. Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis Using the information you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid on the template, complete the Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis portion of the template, by addressing the following: Which administrative agency (like HHS, CDC, FDA, OHSA) would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected and why is this agency the most helpful for the issue? How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the presidential agenda? How does it stay there? An entrepreneur/champion/sponsor helps to move the issue forward. Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor (this can be a celebrity, a legislator, an agency director, or others) of the healthcare issue you selected and why would this person be a good entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor? An example is Michael J. Fox is champion for Parkinson’s disease. Part 3: Fact Sheet Using the information recorded on the template in Parts 1 and 2, develop a 1-page fact sheet that you could use to communicate with a policymaker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue. Be sure to address the following: Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues. By Day 7 of Week 2 Submit your final version of Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid, Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis, and Part 3: Narrative. Submission and Grading Information To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following: Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name. Click the Week 2 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment. Click the Week 2 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area. Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open. If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database. Click on the Submit button to complete your submission. Sample Expert Answer and Explanation Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief Assignment Template for Part 1 and Part 2 Identify the Population Health concern you selected. Mental Health Describe the Population Health concern you selected and the factors that contribute to it. Mental health is one serious population health concerns in the US. Millions of people in the US are diagnosed with mental health problems every year. According to National Alliance of Mental Health (2022), 21% (52.9 million people) of the US adults had mental health problems in 2020. The organization also notes that 5.6% of the population with mental illness experienced serious problems. Considerable number of youths about 16.5% also had mental problems. Over 50 million Americans experience mental health problems but only 40% of them get medical attention (National Alliance of Mental Health (NAMI), 2022). Administration (President Name) (Current President) Joseph Robinette “Joe” Biden Jr. (Previous President) Donald J. Trump (Previous President) Barrack Obama Describe the administrative agenda focus related to this issue for the current and two previous presidents. Joe Biden’s administration’s focus on mental health is to improve mental health coverage. The administration demands health insurers to offer suitable network of behavioral health providers without cost-sharing. Biden’s administration wants to improve parity in mental health care. Trump’s administration focused on building more building more psychiatric hospitals and civil commitments as a way to improve mental health of Americans. Obama addressed mental health by signing mental health reform into law. This
Examine Case Study An African American Child Suffering From Depression. You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the medication to prescribe to this client. Be sure to consider factors
Examine Case Study An African American Child Suffering From Depression. You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the medication to prescribe to this client. The Assignment Examine Case Study An African American Child Suffering From Depression. You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the medication to prescribe to this client. Be sure to consider factors that might impact the client’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes. At each decision point stop to complete the following: Decision #1 Which decision did you select? Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources. What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources. Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #1 and the results of the decision. Why were they different? Decision #2 Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources. What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources. Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #2 and the results of the decision. Why were they different? Decision #3 Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources. What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources. Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #3 and the results of the decision. Why were they different? Also include how ethical considerations might impact your treatment plan and communication with clients. Note: Support your rationale with a minimum of three academic resources. While you may use the course text to support your rationale, it will not count toward the resource requirement. Sample Expert Answer Assessing and Treating Pediatric Clients With Mood Disorders The patient who visited the healthcare facility is an 8-year-old African American boy exhibiting signs of depression. The patient noted that he feels sad. His mother reported that, according to his teacher, the child is withdrawn from peers in class (Laureate Education (2016e). The mother also notes that the patient experiences occasional irritation periods and decreased appetite. During the clinical interview, the child had clear speech, was spontaneous, goal-oriented, and alert. The clinical interview revealed that the child is not delusional or paranoid. He often thinks of himself as dead. When the Children’s Depression Rating Scale was administered, a score of 30 was obtained, indicating that the kid has significant depression (Laureate Education (2016e). As a result, three decisions were made to treat the patient, as discussed below. Decision 1 My first decision was recommending that the child begin Zoloft 25 mg orally daily. I selected the decision because Zoloft is a drug belonging to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and used to treat depression, panic disorder, post-traumatic disorder (PTSD), obsessive-compulsive disorder, and anxiety (Lorberg, Davico, Martsenkovskyi & Vitiello, 2019). The authors recommend that when prescribing Zoloft to children, a caregiver should prescribe 25 mg. I was hoping to reduce the patient’s symptoms by 50%, as Lorberg et al. (2019) suggested. I expected to reduce the patient’s depressive symptoms significantly. However, the client returned to the facility in four weeks, arguing that he did not see any changes after taking the medications as prescribed. The decisions were different because the patient did not respond to the mediations. As a result, I was forced to re-think my decision and make new recommendations. Decision 2 The second decision was increasing the dose to 37.5 mg orally daily. According to Stahl (2014b), if the first Zoloft prescription does not make significant changes, the dosage can be increased by 12.5 mg. Therefore, I increased the dosage to 37.5 mg orally daily to improve the effectiveness of the medication. I hoped that the second decision would reduce the depressive symptoms experienced by the kid by 50%. Improving the dosage of any SSRI medication can significantly affect a patient by reducing depressive systems (Stahl, 2013). However, my expectations and the results were different. The patient returned four weeks later and reported that the depressive symptoms decreased by 20% and felt somehow better. Though my full expectations were not achieved, the patient started regaining his optimal health. Decision 3 The third decision was to increase the Zoloft dosage to 50 mg orally daily. I made this decision because of the results of decision point two. I through that increasing Zoloft dosage to50 mg orally daily would further reduce the depressive symptoms experienced by the patient. I decided to hope to improve the current patient’s health condition by 30%. However, sufficient symptom reduction was not realized after four weeks of usage. The patient had not experienced a 50% symptom decrease after taking the medication for eight years. The medication can either be increased or the therapy changed to another agent (Lorberg et al., 2019). Ethical Considerations To make decisions, the following ethical considerations should be considered because they might impact treatment plans. The first consideration is patient informed consent. The nurse must ask for consent before prescribing medications to the patient (Resnik, MacDougall & Smith, 2018). Second, the nurse should respect the patient’s autonomy and how his mother to decide on his health. References Laureate Education (2016e). Case study: An African American child suffering from depression [Interactive media file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. Lorberg, B., Davico, C., Martsenkovskyi, D., & Vitiello, B. (2019). Principles in using psychotropic medication in children and adolescents. In J. M. Rey & A. Martin (Eds.), IACAPAP e-Textbook of Child and Adolescent Mental Health. Geneva: International Association for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Allied Professions. Retrieved from https://iacapap.org/content/uploads/A.7-Psychopharmacology-2019.1.pdf Resnik, D. B., MacDougall, D. R., & Smith, E. M. (2018). Ethical dilemmas in protecting susceptible subpopulations from environmental health risks: Liberty, utility, fairness, and accountability for reasonableness. The American Journal of Bioethics, 18(3), 29-41. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15265161.2017.1418922 Stahl, S. M. (2013). Stahl’s essential psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical applications (4th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Stahl, S. M. (2014b). The prescriber’s guide (5th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. https://stahlonline.cambridge.org/prescribers_guide.jsf Place your order now for a similar assignment and get fast, cheap and best quality work written by our expert level assignment writers.Use Coupon: NEW30 to Get 30% OFF Your First Order Background Information The client is an 8-year-old African American male who arrives at the ER with his mother. He is exhibiting signs of depression. Client complained of feeling “sad” Mother reports that teacher
Describe the posts or conversations in which you have engaged that might be considered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing
Describe the posts or conversations in which you have engaged that might be considered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing Social media plays a significant role in the lives of nurses in both their professional and personal lives. Additionally, social media is now considered a mainstream part of the process for recruiting and hiring candidates. Inappropriate or unethical conduct on social media can create legal problems for nurses as well as the field of nursing. Login to all social media sites in which you engage. Review your profile, pictures and posts. Based on the professional standards of nursing, identify items that would be considered unprofessional and potentially detrimental to your career and that negatively impact the reputation of the nursing field. In 500-750 words, summarize the findings of your review. Include the following: Describe the posts or conversations in which you have engaged that might be considered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing. Discuss why nurses have a responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistent with the standards governing the profession of nursing at work and in their personal lives. Include discussion of how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethical or unprofessional. Provide an example of each to support your answer. Based on the analysis of your social media, discuss what areas of your social media activity reflect Christian values as they relate to respecting human value and dignity for all individuals. Describe areas of your social media activity that could be improved. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance. Sample Answer Social media is a crucial tool among healthcare givers as it is serves as a vital source of information and a channel communication among nurses. Through social media, nurses can foster proper nurse-patient relations by engaging them in practical nursing-based discussions that help them improve the outcomes of care. Unfortunately, there are times when social media channels can be used to channel unprofessionalism among nurses, where irresponsible workers fail to adhere to the set nursing code of conduct when using social media. Health care workers must learn to place boundaries between personal and professional social media posts. The use of social media among nurses is restrictive to professional standards of nursing that are set by the American Nurses Association (ANA). Despite the great merits that the use of social media can obtain, nurses must ensure they portray professional behavior in social media, adhere to ANA rules that dictate that nurses should not share any patient information in social media, and also uphold the HIPAA privacy violation rules. Inappropriate Posts Based on Professional Nursing Standards Any social media post by all nurses must convey professional behavior and must ensure patients confidentiality. Some examples of unprofessional behavior among nurses Include but are not limited to alcohol or drug use, racist comments, use of vulgar language, sexually explicit images, undesirable comments regarding employer or co-workers, and any harassing comments. Nurses might violate Patients’ privacy by posting patients’ photos or details, whether intentional or unintentional. In the course of pursuing my nursing career, I might have violated some of these rules. After an exhausting day in one of my nursing shifts, I vented my frustrations on social medial, specifically among my friends in a WhatsApp group after a drunk patient vomited near my working area. The alcohol in the content he vomited made the smell unbearable, and out of rage, I used profane words to describe the patient. In one of my Facebook posts, I mentioned one of my irritable patients who addressed me rudely and asked for another nurse to tend to them. After an extensive study on nursing professional standards, I have learned to adhere to the professional nursing rules in my social media encounters and avoid any posts that might violate the rules. Why Nurses Have a Responsibility to Uphold Standard of Conduct Nursing professionals are responsible for upholding a standard of conduct because they are highly regarded as the primary caregivers among patients and can easily access any patient’s private information. Nurses’ social media presence should convey a high level of professionalism as well as their physical presence. The main reason for the set professional standards is to ensure safe and clinically proficient nurses. The rules provide a basis for evaluating and analyzing the performance of nurses. If the employer suspects neglect of a nurse’s care or a deviation from the professional ethic, the employer can choose the correct course of action. An example of the inappropriate action is any breach in keeping a patient’s private records or personal information, such as leaking their area of residence, photos, or the illness they are suffering from, which is a breach of HIPAA privacy rules. The portrayal of any unethical behavior by nurses, such as rudeness, racial tendencies, or harassment, should be duly addressed. Unprofessional nurses might lead to the loss of patients and the overall fall of an organization, and hence health organizations should educate on the importance of maintaining professional standards. Social Media Activities that Reflect Christian Values Following the HIPAA privacy rules by not posting patients’ photos, avoiding negative comments about patients, and not disclosing any patients’ details shows Christian values. It reflects respect for patients’ values and integrity. As a nurse, I seek to uphold the values in social media by non-disclosure of any information regarding my patients and entirely to avoid using patients’ photos in posts. I am bound by my Christian values to avoid uncouth behavior towards patients and treat each patient with compassion. I uphold equal treatment of each patient regardless of their background, race, or gender and treat each patient encounters with respect.
Describe how advanced practice nurses can collaborate with other healthcare professionals and community stakeholders to address the needs of populations.
Describe how advanced practice nurses can collaborate with other healthcare professionals and community stakeholders to address the needs of populations. Quick Answer Summary Advanced practice nurses (APNs) collaborate with healthcare professionals and community stakeholders through: Interprofessional teams with physicians, social workers, and allied health professionals Community partnerships with schools, faith-based organizations, and local agencies Shared decision-making protocols and communication systems Population health competencies including leadership, cultural competency, and systems thinking Evidence-based frameworks for sustainable collaboration and outcome measurement Key Success Factors: Role clarity, mutual respect, shared goals, regular communication, and continuous evaluation of partnerships. Introduction In today’s complex healthcare landscape, the role of Advanced Practice Nurses (APNs) has evolved far beyond traditional clinical boundaries to become catalysts for comprehensive population health transformation. Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) include nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, nurse anesthetists, and nurse midwives. APRNs are often primary care providers and are at the forefront of providing preventive care services to the public. This expanded role positions APNs as essential leaders in addressing the multifaceted health needs of diverse populations through strategic collaboration with healthcare professionals and community stakeholders. The imperative for collaborative approaches in population health has never been more critical. As healthcare systems worldwide grapple with rising chronic disease prevalence, health disparities, and resource constraints, the traditional siloed approach to healthcare delivery has proven insufficient. Effective communication, teamwork, and interprofessional collaboration, or teams of health and non-health professionals working together, are critical to improving the patient experience of care; improving population health; and reducing healthcare costs (i.e., the Triple Aim). This comprehensive guide explores how advanced practice nurses can leverage their unique position, expertise, and interprofessional competencies to build meaningful partnerships that address population health challenges. By examining evidence-based frameworks, practical implementation strategies, and real-world applications, this article provides APNs with the tools and knowledge necessary to become effective collaborative leaders in population health initiatives. What Are the Key Ways APNs Collaborate? Advanced practice nurses utilize five primary collaboration approaches: Interprofessional Healthcare Teams – Working with physicians, pharmacists, and specialists Community Stakeholder Partnerships – Engaging schools, faith organizations, and local agencies Population Health Assessment – Conducting comprehensive community health evaluations Shared Decision-Making Protocols – Implementing structured communication and care coordination Outcome Measurement Systems – Tracking collaboration effectiveness and health improvements Understanding the Foundation: Advanced Practice Nursing in Population Health Context The Evolution of Advanced Practice Nursing Advanced practice nursing has undergone significant transformation over the past decades, evolving from specialty-focused roles to comprehensive population health leaders. The World Health Organization (WHO) called for the expansion of all nursing roles, including advanced practice nurses (APNs), nurse practitioners (NPs) and clinical nurse specialists (CNSs). This global recognition underscores the critical importance of APNs in addressing complex health challenges through collaborative approaches. The current healthcare environment demands a shift from reactive, disease-focused care to proactive, population-centered strategies. APNs are uniquely positioned to lead this transformation due to their advanced clinical training, holistic perspective, and deep understanding of social determinants of health. Their educational preparation in population health competencies, combined with their clinical expertise, creates a powerful foundation for effective collaboration across multiple sectors. Core Competencies for Collaborative Practice Successful collaboration in population health requires APNs to develop and refine specific competencies that extend beyond traditional clinical skills. These competencies include: Competency Area Key Skills Application in Population Health Measurable Outcomes Leadership and Advocacy Collaboration, influence, communication, problem-solving Advocating for populations, addressing systemic barriers Policy changes, resource allocation improvements Cultural Competency Cultural humility, cross-cultural communication, bias recognition Building trust with diverse communities Increased participation rates, reduced health disparities Systems Thinking Complex problem analysis, interconnection mapping Understanding social determinants of health Comprehensive intervention strategies Communication and Negotiation Stakeholder engagement, conflict resolution Facilitating partnerships, securing resources Partnership agreements, sustained funding Data Analysis and Interpretation Epidemiological analysis, outcome measurement Evidence-based decision making Improved health outcomes, cost-effectiveness Leadership and Advocacy: Advocating for others requires skills in collaboration, influence, communication, and problem-solving (ANA, 2023b). APNs must develop the ability to advocate not only for individual patients but for entire populations, working with diverse stakeholders to address systemic barriers to health. Cultural Competency and Health Equity: Understanding and addressing the unique needs of diverse populations requires cultural humility and competency. APNs must navigate cultural differences while building trust and rapport with community stakeholders from various backgrounds. Systems Thinking: Population health challenges are complex and interconnected. APNs must develop systems thinking capabilities to understand how various factors—social, economic, environmental, and political—influence health outcomes and how interventions in one area can impact others. Communication and Negotiation: Effective collaboration requires exceptional communication skills, including the ability to translate complex healthcare concepts for diverse audiences and negotiate mutually beneficial partnerships. Evidence-Based Collaboration Frameworks for Advanced Practice Nurses The Interprofessional Collaboration Model Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is seen as the “gold standard” of comprehensive care, but credible evidence concerning the effects on patient-reported outcomes (PRO) is lacking. Despite this research gap, substantial evidence supports the effectiveness of interprofessional collaboration in improving healthcare outcomes. Effective interprofessional … of care; improved patient outcomes, safety, and quality of care, particularly for complex cases and chronic diseases; more equitable care for marginalized populations or those in resource-limited settings; a comprehensive, coordinated, and safe health system that is responsive to the needs of the population The interprofessional collaboration model provides a structured approach for APNs to work effectively with diverse healthcare professionals. This model emphasizes: Shared Goals and Vision: All team members must align around common population health objectives Role Clarity and Mutual Respect: Each professional contributes unique expertise while respecting others’ contributions Effective Communication: Regular, structured communication channels ensure information sharing and coordination Shared Decision-Making: Collaborative processes for planning and implementing interventions Continuous Evaluation: Regular assessment of outcomes and process improvement The Population Health Collaboration Framework Building upon interprofessional collaboration principles, the Population Health Collaboration Framework specifically addresses the unique challenges of population-focused interventions. This framework incorporates: Community Engagement: Meaningful involvement of community members in all phases of planning and implementation Data-Driven Decision Making: Use of population health data to identify priorities and
170+ Best Nursing Topics for Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Projects
A Comprehensive Guide for Nursing Students Evidence-based practice (EBP) has become the cornerstone of modern nursing education and clinical practice. As we advance into 2025, nursing students face the challenge of selecting relevant, impactful topics for their EBP assignments that reflect current healthcare trends and address pressing patient care needs. This comprehensive guide presents the most current and relevant evidence-based practice nursing topics, designed to help students excel in their academic pursuits while contributing meaningfully to healthcare outcomes. Understanding Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing Evidence-based practice in nursing integrates the best available research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values to make informed decisions about patient care. For nursing students, EBP assignments serve as crucial learning tools that bridge theoretical knowledge with practical application, preparing them for real-world clinical scenarios. The significance of EBP in nursing cannot be overstated. According to recent healthcare statistics, hospitals implementing evidence-based practices report 15-20% improvement in patient outcomes and 10-15% reduction in healthcare costs. This makes EBP topic selection critical for both academic success and future professional impact. Top Evidence-Based Practice Nursing Topics for 2025 1. Digital Health and Technology Integration Primary Focus Areas: Telehealth implementation in rural healthcare settings AI-assisted clinical decision-making tools Electronic health record optimization Mobile health applications for chronic disease management Research Questions: How does telehealth implementation affect patient satisfaction in rural communities? What is the impact of AI diagnostic tools on nursing workflow efficiency? How do mobile health apps improve medication adherence in diabetic patients? 2. Mental Health and Psychiatric Nursing Critical Topics: Post-pandemic mental health interventions Trauma-informed care in emergency departments Suicide prevention strategies in healthcare settings Mental health screening protocols in primary care Statistics: Mental health-related emergency department visits increased by 25% post-2020, making this area particularly relevant for EBP research. 3. Infection Control and Prevention Key Areas: Antimicrobial resistance prevention strategies Hand hygiene compliance improvement methods Isolation protocol effectiveness Healthcare-associated infection reduction techniques Research Focus: Effectiveness of educational interventions on hand hygiene compliance Impact of antimicrobial stewardship programs on resistance rates Comparative analysis of isolation protocols across different healthcare settings 4. Geriatric and Aging Population Care Essential Topics: Fall prevention strategies in elderly care facilities Dementia care best practices Polypharmacy management in older adults Age-friendly healthcare environment design Supporting Data: By 2025, adults aged 65+ will comprise 20% of the U.S. population, making geriatric care EBP topics increasingly relevant. 5. Pediatric and Neonatal Nursing Focus Areas: Pain management in pediatric patients Family-centered care implementation Neonatal intensive care unit best practices Childhood obesity prevention programs Research Opportunities: Effectiveness of non-pharmacological pain management in children Impact of family presence during medical procedures Comparative analysis of feeding protocols in NICUs Evidence-Based Practice Topics by Specialty Areas Medical-Surgical Nursing Topic Category Specific Research Areas Evidence Level Wound Care Negative pressure therapy effectiveness Level I Post-operative Care Early mobilization protocols Level I Medication Administration Barcode scanning impact on errors Level II Patient Education Discharge planning effectiveness Level II Emergency Nursing High-Impact Topics: Triage accuracy improvement methods Sepsis recognition and early intervention Emergency department overcrowding solutions Trauma care protocol standardization Research Statistics: Emergency departments implementing evidence-based triage protocols report 30% reduction in patient wait times and 20% improvement in patient satisfaction scores. Critical Care Nursing Priority Areas: Ventilator-associated pneumonia prevention Delirium assessment and management Family communication in ICU settings End-of-life care protocols Community Health Nursing Relevant Topics: Health promotion program effectiveness Chronic disease management in communities Healthcare access improvement strategies Cultural competency in healthcare delivery Easy EBP Nursing Topics for Beginners For nursing students new to evidence-based practice research, these topics provide manageable scope while maintaining academic rigor: Beginner-Friendly Research Areas Hand Hygiene Compliance Scope: Single unit or department Methodology: Observational study with intervention Timeline: 4-6 weeks Patient Fall Prevention Focus: Specific fall prevention protocol Measurement: Fall rates before and after intervention Setting: Medical-surgical unit Medication Error Reduction Intervention: Double-checking protocols Outcome: Error rate comparison Duration: 8-week study period Patient Education Effectiveness Topic: Discharge instruction comprehension Method: Pre/post-test design Population: Specific patient group Advanced EBP Topics for Graduate Students Complex Research Areas Multi-System Interventions: Interprofessional collaboration impact on patient outcomes Healthcare system redesign for chronic disease management Quality improvement initiatives across multiple departments Population Health Focus: Social determinants of health impact studies Healthcare equity improvement strategies Community-based intervention effectiveness Research Methodology Considerations Quantitative Research Approaches Research Design Best Applied To Strength of Evidence Randomized Controlled Trial Intervention effectiveness Highest Cohort Study Long-term outcomes High Case-Control Study Risk factor identification Moderate Cross-sectional Survey Current practice assessment Moderate Qualitative Research Methods When to Use: Understanding patient experiences Exploring healthcare provider perspectives Investigating cultural factors in care delivery Examining barriers to implementation Current Healthcare Trends Influencing EBP Topics Post-Pandemic Healthcare Priorities Infection Control Enhancement Personal protective equipment optimization Visitor policy effectiveness Remote monitoring implementation Workforce Resilience Nurse burnout prevention strategies Staffing model effectiveness Professional development impact Healthcare Delivery Innovation Hybrid care models Remote patient monitoring AI-assisted clinical decision-making Emerging Technology Integration Priority Areas: Wearable device data utilization Predictive analytics in patient care Virtual reality in nursing education Robotic assistance in clinical settings Topic Selection Guidelines Assessment Criteria When selecting evidence-based practice topics, consider these essential factors: Clinical Relevance Addresses current healthcare challenges Impacts patient outcomes Applicable to practice setting Research Feasibility Available resources and time Access to study population Ethical considerations Evidence Availability Sufficient literature base Recent research publications Diverse study designs Personal Interest Aligns with career goals Matches specialty interests Sustainable motivation Implementation Strategies Successful EBP Project Development Phase 1: Planning (Weeks 1-2) Literature review completion Methodology selection Resource identification Phase 2: Implementation (Weeks 3-8) Data collection Intervention delivery Progress monitoring Phase 3: Evaluation (Weeks 9-10) Data analysis Outcome assessment Recommendation development Common Challenges and Solutions Challenge Solution Strategy Limited time Focus on single-unit studies Resource constraints Utilize existing data sources Access barriers Partner with clinical sites Scope too broad Narrow to specific population Quality Improvement Integration Linking EBP to QI Initiatives Evidence-based practice assignments can directly contribute to quality improvement efforts by: Identifying best practices for implementation Measuring intervention effectiveness Providing data for
In a 4 to 5 page project proposal written to the leadership of your healthcare organization, propose a nursing informatics project for your organization that you advocate to improve patient outcomes or patient-care efficiency
Assignment: In a 4 to 5 page project proposal written to the leadership of your healthcare organization In the Discussion for this module, you considered the interaction of nurse informaticists with other specialists to ensure successful care. How is that success determined? Patient outcomes and the fulfillment of care goals is one of the major ways that healthcare success is measured. Measuring patient outcomes results in the generation of data that can be used to improve results. Nursing informatics can have a significant part in this process and can help to improve outcomes by improving processes, identifying at-risk patients, and enhancing efficiency. To Prepare: Review the concepts of technology application as presented in the Resources. Reflect on how emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence may help fortify nursing informatics as a specialty by leading to increased impact on patient outcomes or patient care efficiencies. The Assignment: (4-5 pages) In a 4 to 5 page project proposal written to the leadership of your healthcare organization, propose a nursing informatics project for your organization that you advocate to improve patient outcomes or patient-care efficiency. Your project proposal should include the following: Describe the project you propose. Identify the stakeholders impacted by this project. Explain the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies this project is aimed at improving and explain how this improvement would occur. Be specific and provide examples. Identify the technologies required to implement this project and explain why. Identify the project team (by roles) and explain how you would incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team. Nursing Informatics Project – Sample Answer The Impact of Nursing Informatics on Patient Outcomes and Patient Care Efficiencies Among the ways that informatics has helped to transform care is improved documentation systems, where care providers can easily access important patient and staff information that leads to coordinated care. The introduction of nurse informatics also helps to improve the processes in care and hence to generate improved care outcomes (Robert, 2019). Also, with informatics, healthcare givers can identify at-risk patients in a timely fashion and give them more priority to care. Description of Proposed Project: The Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Nurse Informatics Artificial intelligence, commonly known as AI, is the simulation of intelligence of humans to machines to make these machines adopt human functions. Over the years, there have been improvement of the AI functions as technologies continue improving. Today AI applications include but are not limited to speech recognition, machine vision, natural language processing, and expert systems. Healthcare implements AI by using complex software and algorithms to interpret and comprehend complex medical data (Clancy, 2020). The fact that AI uses technologies that can gain information and process it to refined outputs means that it can have limitless applications in healthcare. In this project, the implementation of AI in the field of nurse informatics is closely examined. Stakeholders Impacted by the Project There are several stakeholders who are impacted by the project, with the patients being on the first line. Most of the actions in the project involve patient care, as the objective of the project is to improve the patient care outcomes. The second most impacted stakeholders are the healthcare givers and specifically the nurses, who also play a crucial role in coordinating patient care with other healthcare givers. Nurses are the individuals who are in contact with the patients for the longest periods hence it becomes easy to monitor them. Patient families are also influential stakeholders in this project as much of the actions will require their consent as well as their opinion output on the options available. Regulators will also take a primary position in the project, especially because machine learning and other elements of artificial intelligence can also have drastic patient outcomes if reckless researchers or healthcare providers are allowed to take the center-stage in implementing non-proven measures. Lastly, the healthcare financiers will be part of the stakeholders since AI is an expensive field that requires strategic financing. Patient Outcomes or Patient Care Efficiencies that the Project is aimed at Improving The first patient outcome that the project is aimed at improving is the diagnostic procedures of care. Through application of AI in nursing informatics, nurses can efficiently perform nursing diagnoses to improve the detection of the presence of absence of disease and determine the best care operations for specific patents. Among the diseases that can be efficiently diagnosed using AI is cardiovascular disease and diabetes, which are among the leading causes of mortality worldwide. AI is also expected to help in the integration of telehealth in the care of patients. Telemedicine or telehealth helps in monitoring of patient information using strategic and remote techniques, and using automated means. It allows patients with chronic conditions to have long contact with the healthcare providers regardless of the physical barriers (Erikson & Salzmann-Erikson, 2016). Using AI in telehealth improves the efficiency of administration of drugs, as patients can consult physicians at their convenience of their homes. Also, these programs allow the education and advice of patients, remote admissions, as well as constant monitoring. The project is also aimed at showing the relevant drug interactions that could help the patients achieve synergy of the drugs and improve the effects. Also, in the same way, AI technology can help to identify lethal interactions that could lead to risking of the patients’ lives. Specifically, the project helps patients to identify the most suitable options when it comes to drug administration. It is easy to find that most chronic disease patients experience polypharmacy, and they are confused whether taking an additional drug would lead to improved outcomes. With AI, healthcare givers do not have to take multiple lab tests to determine the suitability of an additional medication for the patient. The project is aimed at boosting the interaction of the patients as well as the healthcare givers with electronic health records. The digitization of information in facilities has often been cited to have some drawbacks such as having burnout among users and also cognitive overloads.
Watch the YMH Boston Vignette 5 video and take notes; you will use this video as the basis for your Discussion post Based on the YMH Boston Vignette 5 video, post answers to the following questions
Assignment: Based on the YMH Boston Vignette 5 video, post answers to the following questions Many assessment principles are the same for children and adults; however, unlike with adults/older adults, where consent for participation in the assessment comes from the actual client, with children it is the parents or guardians who must make the decision for treatment. Issues of confidentiality, privacy, and consent must be addressed. When working with children, it is not only important to be able to connect with the pediatric patient, but also to be able to collaborate effectively with the caregivers, other family members, teachers, and school counselors/psychologists, all of whom will be able to provide important context and details to aid in your assessment and treatment plans. Some children/adolescents may be more difficult to assess than adults, as they can be less psychologically minded. That is, they have less insights into themselves and their motivations than adults (although this is not universally true). The PMHNP must also take into consideration the child’s culture and environmental context. Additionally, with children/adolescents, there are lower rates of neurocognitive disorders superimposed on other clinical conditions, such as depression or anxiety, which create additional diagnostic challenges. In this Discussion, you review and critique the techniques and methods of a mental health professional as the practitioner completes a comprehensive, integrated psychiatric assessment of an adolescent. You also identify rating scales and treatment options that are specifically appropriate for children/adolescents. To Prepare Review the Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide on comprehensive, integrated psychiatric assessment. Watch the Mental Status Examination B-6 and Simulation Scenario-Adolescent Risk Assessment videos. Watch the YMH Boston Vignette 5 video and take notes; you will use this video as the basis for your Discussion post. By Day 3 of Week 1 Based on the YMH Boston Vignette 5 video, post answers to the following questions: What did the practitioner do well? In what areas can the practitioner improve? At this point in the clinical interview, do you have any compelling concerns? If so, what are they? What would be your next question, and why? Then, address the following. Your answers to these prompts do not have to be tailored to the patient in the YMH Boston video. Explain why a thorough psychiatric assessment of a child/adolescent is important. Describe two different symptom rating scales that would be appropriate to use during the psychiatric assessment of a child/adolescent. Describe two psychiatric treatment options for children and adolescents that may not be used when treating adults. Explain the role parents/guardians play in assessment. Support your response with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources and explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources. Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses. By Day 6 of Week 1 Respond to at least two of your colleagues on 2 different days by offering additional insights or alternative perspectives on their analysis of the video, other rating scales that may be used with children, or other treatment options for children not yet mentioned. Be specific and provide a rationale with evidence. YMH Boston Vignette 5 video: Sample Answer What was Done well and what to Improve One of the things the practitioner did well is suspending judgment. She did not judge the patient based on his answers. Patients, especially adolescents might avoid being open if the practitioner engaging them is judgmental. The practitioner also did well by avoiding making assumptions without claims. She was also so engaging and maintained eye contact with the patient. Her communication skills were unremarkable. She showed empathy by seeking out and understanding the adolescent reasons for her behaviors. However, the practitioner should have improved her understanding of the adolescent’s beliefs and thoughts of some depression symptoms. Concerns My only concern at this point of the interview is that the practitioner’s questions are too open-ended. I think the practitioner should have used closed-ended questions to allow the patient to give a longer explanation about his feeling. Overall, the assessment was great. Next Question My next question would be what made you think about hurting yourself. This question would help me understand why the patient is depressed and why he thought of committing suicide. After getting answers to this question, it would be easy for me to work with the patient and plan his treatment plan. Importance of Psychiatric Assessment A thorough psychiatric assessment of adolescents or children is vital due to the following reasons. First, a thorough assessment will help the practitioner understand the cause of the patient’s presenting symptoms. The practitioner will get the full detail of what is happening to the patient after an exhaustive psychiatric assessment. Second, a thorough psychiatric assessment will help the practitioner make an accurate diagnosis of diseases affecting the patient. Assessment will also give the practitioner an idea of what psychiatric series and types of treatment therapies can help recover back to normal health. Rating Scales One of the rating scales that can be used to diagnose adolescents or children is the Adolescent Depression Rating Scale (Krause et al., 2019). This scale rating scale has 10 items that the practitioner will look for in the patient. According to Krause et al. (2019), ADRS is a short, applicable, self-report and clinical report scale that can be used to evaluate adolescent depression levels. Another scale is the Children’s Depression Rating Scale. This scale was developed to rate the level of depression among children aged 6-12 years (Pakpour et al., 2019). It has seventeen items rated by a psychiatric interview with the kid and their parents. Treatment Methods One of the treatment methods that can only be used in the teen residential treatment. This treatment therapy is exclusively made for adolescents. de Andrade et al. (2019) note that residential programs are effective in treating depressive adolescents. The second treatment method is inpatient teen mental health treatment. This teen treatment program is also focused on helping teens with mental problems. This program should not take more than thirty days. In the inpatient program, the patient will be closely monitored by practitioners to ensure that they
Submit a summary of six of your articles on the discussion board. Discuss one strength and one weakness for each of these six articles on why
Topic 3 DQ 1 Submit a summary of six of your articles on the discussion board. Discuss one strength and one weakness for each of these six articles on why the article may or may not provide sufficient evidence for your practice change. Topic 3 DQ 2 Name two different methods for evaluating evidence. Compare and contrast these two methods. Topic 3 DQ 1 – Sample Answer Summary of Six Articles The review by Dugani et al. (2018) found that various healthcare facilities in low and middle-income countries report high rate of burnout. The strength of this study is that the authors clearly showed the inclusion and exclusion criteria. However, few articles were used as the sample of the study making it hard to generalize findings. The strength of the paper by Griffiths et al. (2016) is that it has clearly highlighted what is know and what the paper aimed to achieve, and this can give the reader a clear picture of the focus of the paper. However, the weakness of the paper is that it experienced some level of bias with estimates from personal studies. Gyllensten, et al. (2017)’s strength is that the semi-structured data collection method allowed them to gather a lot of information. However, the weakness of the paper is that it had lower response rate of about 10%. The strength of Hart et al. (2018)’s study was that the authors used credible and reliable databases to extract articles for review. Also, the authors explained how they excluded and included articles so well. However, the researchers had problem with originality of the study. The strength of the article by Kurnat-Thoma et al. (2017) is that they used sophisticated method to collect data and also, the data gathered was correct and accurate. However, some elements of biasness were detected in the study, and this affected findings. Lastly, the strength of the article by Souders et al. (2017) is that data analysis showed that the results were statistically significant. However, the researchers had limited time and resources to make the study larger and more accurate. References Dugani, S., Afari, H., Hirschhorn, L. R., Ratcliffe, H., Veillard, J., Martin, G., … & Bitton, A. (2018). Prevalence and factors associated with burnout among frontline primary health care providers in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Gates open research, 2. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.12779.2 Griffiths, P., Ball, J., Drennan, J., Dall’Ora, C., Jones, J., Maruotti, A., … & Simon, M. (2016). Nurse staffing and patient outcomes: Strengths and limitations of the evidence to inform policy and practice. A review and discussion paper based on evidence reviewed for the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Safe Staffing guideline development. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 63, 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.03.012 Gyllensten, K., Andersson, G., & Muller, H. (2017). Experiences of reduced work hours for nurses and assistant nurses at a surgical department: a qualitative study. BMC nursing, 16(1), 16. https://bmcnurs.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12912-017-0210-x Hart, T., Samways, J. W., Kukendrarajah, K., Keenan, M., & Chaudhri, S. (2018). Improving out-of-hours surgical patient care. International journal of health care quality assurance. Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJHCQA-08-2017-0148 Kurnat-Thoma, E., Ganger, M., Peterson, K., & Channell, L. (2017). Reducing annual hospital and registered nurse staff turnover—A 10-element onboarding program intervention. SAGE Open Nursing, 3, 2377960817697712. DOI: 10.1177/2377960817697712 Souders, C. P., Catchpole, K. R., Wood, L. N., Solnik, J. M., Avenido, R. M., Strauss, P. L., … & Anger, J. T. (2017). Reducing operating room turnover time for robotic surgery using a motor racing pit stop model. World journal of surgery, 41(8), 1943-1949. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00268-017-3936-4 Topic 3 DQ 2 – Sample Answer Methods for Evaluating Evidence There are many approaches researchers can use to evaluate evidence. However, researchers should select the best methods that can work for them. That said, the key approaches that will be used to analyze evidence in this project are interviews and surveys. According to J. Phillips and P. Phillips (2016), survey is an evidence evaluation method where one is allowed to use series of questionnaires to gather information about the evidence. Through surveys, researchers are at liberty to use the open-ended or free-response inquiries to gather data. Apart from questionnaires, researchers can also use checklists as instruments to collect information about the evidence being evaluated. Järvelin and Kekäläinen (2017) define interview as the approach that can allow the evaluator to structure questions in a way that provides the interviewees the environment to respond to the questions freely. Interviews require that the structured or semi-structured questions are responded to in a documented form. The following are the differences between the approaches. Järvelin and Kekäläinen (2017) report that through survey, researchers can cover many topics at a time while interviews can hinder the scholar from collecting much data because it takes a lot of time. Another significant difference is that surveys are conducted through instruments, such as checklists and questionnaires. However, interviews require that the researcher meets the participants fac-to-face. Though the two approaches are different, they are similar in the following ways. First, they can be used to evaluate the objectives, goals, and the findings of evidences. Second, the two methods can provide the researchers with opportunity to create a relationship with their respondents. Lastly, data collected using the two methods are easy to analyze. References Phillips, J. J., & Phillips, P. P. (2016). Handbook of training evaluation and measurement methods. Routledge. Järvelin, K., & Kekäläinen, J. (2017, August). IR evaluation methods for retrieving highly relevant documents. In ACM SIGIR Forum (Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 243-250). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3130348.3130374 Place your order now on the similar assignment and get fast, cheap and best quality work written from scratch by our expert level assignment writers. How to Summarize and Critique Six Articles for a Discussion Board Introduction If you’ve been asked to “submit a summary of six of your articles on the discussion board and discuss one strength and one weakness for each,” you might feel overwhelmed. How do you summarize effectively? What makes a strong critique? This guide provides a step-by-step method and real-world
Explain the strategic position and action evaluation (SPACE) matrix. How may adaptive strategic alternatives be developed using SPACE?
Assignment Exercises: Why should program evaluation be used for public health and not-for-profit institutions in the development of adaptive strategies? Explain the strategic position and action evaluation (SPACE) matrix. How may adaptive strategic alternatives be developed using SPACE? Professional Development: Case Study #8: “Dr. Louis Mickael: The Physician as Strategic Manager” Develop an environmental assessment and an internal capabilities analysis using decision support tools that have been introduced in this module (such as PLC analysis, BCG portfolio analysis, SPACE analysis and so on). Analyze alternative strategies to include pros and cons of each alternative, then conclude with a recommended strategy and brief implementation plan. Strategic Alternatives – Expert Answer and Explanation Program Evaluation According to Ginter et al. (2013), program evaluation is a strategic analysis technique used mainly by public and not-for-profit organizations to assess their programs and develop strategic alternatives in cases where gaining a competitive edge or market share is not relevant. In most cases, the other tools for developing strategic alternatives, such as SWOT analysis, an organization is usually compared with other competing firms or products. However, in program evaluation, the analysis is mainly used for internal and external assessment to evaluate whether the various programs are meeting the mission and vision of the organization (Strang, 2018). Other than that, program evaluation is useful in identifying whether the resources allocated to the various programs are sufficient to fulfill the strategic goals of the organization. In program evaluation, a needs assessment is also conducted to ensure that both public and not-for-profit organizations meet the needs of the communities they are supposed to serve and to identify the best strategic alternatives to fulfill those needs. SPACE Matrix A strategic position and action evaluation matrix, also known by the acronym SPACE matrix is a decision support tool that can be used to formulate strategic alternatives (Ginter et al., 2013). The tool expands on the BCG analysis to develop an appropriate strategic profile of the organization. The SPACE matrix uses graphical charts to depict how strategic alternatives can be applied based on various organizational factors (Ginter et al., 2013). Using the SPACE matrix, adaptive strategic alternatives can be developed by assessing the environmental stability, the competitive position of the organization, the financial and service category strength, after which an examination of the most appropriate adaptive strategic alternative can be done. Professional Development One of the challenging aspects of operating an organization is coming up with effective strategies that can assist the organization to navigate the changing business environment mired with stiff competition For organizations to remain relevant, they have to assess both their internal and external environment, evaluating their strengths and opportunities for growth, eliminating their threats and working on their weaknesses. This paper will develop an environmental assessment using the case study dubbed: “Dr. Louis Mickael: The Physician as Strategic Manager.” Various decision support tools will be used to assess the strategic positioning of Dr. Louis Mickael amidst the changing business environment. Environmental Assessment and an Internal Capabilities Analysis of the Business SWOT Analysis Using the SWOT analysis tool, there are several internal strengths that were observed in Dr. Lou’s practice. One of the strengths was a good reputation with his clients which enabled the business to have a strong footing within the market space. According to Ginter et al. (2013), a healthy business-client relationship is one of the strengths that can act as a stable foothold in maintaining strategic advantage, and this can be seen by the over 800 patients served by the facility which was fairly higher in comparison to other individual practices. The aspect of a good client relationship can be attributed to the skilled employees Dr. Lou had employed, who had a good rapport with the clients served in the practice. Dr. Lou also invested some finances, though on a need to basis to enhance the skills and competencies of personnel to deliver better services, and also the application of technology that was relevant at the onset of the business, which acted as a strategic tool in gaining a competitive edge (Aithal, 2019). Another strength was the fact that Dr. Lou’s practice was linked with most of the third-party payors, which meant that patients served in the facility had a relatively easy time to process their payments. Concerning opportunities, the growing market was one of the considerable opportunities that Dr. Louis’s practice could capitalize on. While at the onset of the business, Dr. Lou’s main client base consisted of mainly young clients, but with the rapidly expanding populations with new businesses being developed, means that there are substantially more types of market bases that could be tapped. The development of a university within the business neighborhood also meant that there is an opportunity to capitalize on a joint venture that will provide residence to the young upcoming physicians and office assistants, thus increasing the number of patients tended to, and at the same time, save on some of the work and staff expenses encountered in Dr. Lou’s practice. Some of the weaknesses that were observed include low financial strength, which is an issue that affected Dr. Lou’s ability to expand and acclimatize to the changing business environment. It can be seen from the financial reports that indicated the firm had yet to have a stable footing in terms of the asset base and the profits generated which could be used to improve the firm’s operations. However, it can be established that the financial strength was steadily improving. This made Dr. Lou have less than enough time to serve his patients. Another weakness was that the technology he was using was outdated as compared to what the competitors were using. Healthcare information technology is a major component that an organization should possess to improve the efficiency of its services, such as processing of client reimbursements (Aithal, 2019). The size of Dr. Lou’s practice was also considered a weakness. This can be seen from when Dr. Lou found it difficult to introduce a new partner to his practice
Describe the differences between a board of nursing and a professional nurse association
Assignment: Describe the differences between a board of nursing and a professional nurse association Nursing is a very highly regulated profession. There are over 100 boards of nursing and national nursing associations throughout the United States and its territories. Their existence helps regulate, inform, and promote the nursing profession. With such numbers, it can be difficult to distinguish between BONs and nursing associations, and overwhelming to consider various benefits and options offered by each. Both boards of nursing and national nursing associations have significant impacts on the nurse practitioner profession and scope of practice. Understanding these differences helps lend credence to your expertise as a professional. In this Assignment, you will practice the application of such expertise by communicating a comparison of boards of nursing and professional nurse associations. You will also share an analysis of your state board of nursing. To Prepare: Assume that you are leading a staff development meeting on regulation for nursing practice at your healthcare organization or agency. Review the NCSBN and ANA websites to prepare for your presentation. The Assignment: (9- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation) Develop a 9- to 10-slide PowerPoint Presentation that addresses the following: Describe the differences between a board of nursing and a professional nurse association. Describe the geographic distribution, academic credentials, practice positions, and licensure status of members of the board for your specific region/area. Who is on the board? How does one become a member of the board? Describe at least one federal regulation for healthcare. How does this regulation influence delivery, cost, and access to healthcare (e.g., CMS, OSHA, and EPA)? Has there been any change to the regulation within the past 5 years? Explain. Describe at least one state regulation related to general nurse scope of practice. How does this regulation influence the nurse’s role? How does this regulation influence delivery, cost, and access to healthcare? Describe at least one state regulation related to Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs). How does this regulation influence the nurse’s role? How does this regulation influence delivery, cost, and access to healthcare? Required Referances Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning. Chapter 4, “Government Response: Regulation” (pp. 57–84) American Nurses Association. (n.d.). ANA enterprise. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from http://www.nursingworld.org Bosse, J., Simmonds, K., Hanson, C., Pulcini, J., Dunphy, L., Vanhook, P., & Poghosyan, L. (2017). Position statement: Full practice authority for advanced practice registered nurses is necessary to transform primary care. Nursing Outlook, 65(6), 761–765. Halm, M. A. (2018). Evaluating the impact of EBP education: Development of a modified Fresno test for acute care nursing. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 15(4), 272–280. doi:10.1111/wvn.12291 National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN). (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.ncsbn.org/index.htm Neff, D. F., Yoon, S. H., Steiner, R. L., Bumbach, M. D., Everhart, D., & Harman J. S. (2018). The impact of nurse practitioner regulations on population access to care. Nursing Outlook, 66(4), 379–385. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2018.03.001 Sample Expert Answer Understanding regulation of nursing profession is important given the nature of the field. There are different organizations which participate in regulating and advancing the nursing practice, knowing each of the organizations and their roles is important. In the US, there are over 100 boards of nursing (BONs) and professional nursing associations. Understanding their roles will help nurses enjoy the full benefits offered by the organizations. The purpose of this presentation is to provide details on how the nursing practice is regulated and the roles of both BONs and professional nursing associations in regulating and advancing the nursing practice. With the vast number of both board of nursing (BONs) and nursing associations, one can get confused about their respective roles in governing nursing practice. Both of these organizations have clear differences in terms of their mandate which are outlined as follows. Board of Nursing BONs are responsible for regulating nursing practice and protecting the public from unqualified or rogue nurses and ensuring that licensed nurses provide safe and competent care. BONs also do not participate in legislation making including lobbying , instead they only implement the formulated legislation as pertains to nursing practice. BONs are government entities formed by the different state governments and one national board having membership picked from the other state BONs (59 state BONs and one national), Professional Nurse Associations Nursing associations are responsible for advocating for nurses interests and advancing the nursing profession (Benton et al., 2017). Nursing association play an active role in representing their members in legislative process, including lobbying political players to support the interests of the nurses and the nursing practice (Milstead & Short, 2019). Nursing associations are private entities with membership requiring annual subscriptions. The Mississippi board of nursing, currently headed by Alton Shaw (FNP), is a thirteen member board comprising of 2 nurse educators, 3 registered nurses in clinical practice, two of which should have as basic nursing preparation an associate degree or diploma and 1 to have at least baccalaureate nursing degree. Another board member is 1 registered nurse at large,1 Registered nursing practitioner, 4 licensed practical nurse, 1 licensed physician who shall always be a member of the State Board of Medical Licensure, 1 representative of consumers of health services The membership should come from each congressional districts in the State of Mississippi. These rules are as outline in the Mississippi Nursing Practice Act amended in 2016. According to the Mississippi Nurse and practice Act, under the establishment of the board guidelines, for one to become a board member in the Mississippi Board of Nursing, other than the member from the State Board of Medical Licensure have to be appointed by the governor with the advice and consent of the senate. The list of nominees forwarded to the governor for consideration are usually submitted by the relevant nursing associations in Mississippi with each slot in list containing three names for consideration. If such a list is not submitted to the governor, then he/she can make the appointments without nomination The term for members in the board is four years with the term