Shadow Health Focused Exam Abdominal Pain
Shadow Health Focused Exam Abdominal Pain The Shadow Health focused exam abdominal pain simulation is a critical virtual patient encounter featuring Esther Park, a 78-year-old Korean woman presenting with abdominal pain. This Digital Clinical Experience™ helps nursing students develop essential assessment skills through realistic patient interactions. Over 700,000 nursing students nationwide use Shadow Health simulations as part of their clinical education, with 82% of learners showing increased efficiency in data collection and therapeutic communication skills. Introduction: Mastering Virtual Patient Simulations Shadow Health focused exam abdominal pain represents one of the most challenging yet essential virtual patient encounters in nursing education. As healthcare education evolves, these digital clinical experiences have become indispensable tools for developing competent, practice-ready nurses. The abdominal pain simulation, specifically featuring patient Esther Park, provides students with a comprehensive learning experience that mirrors real-world clinical scenarios. Understanding how to approach this simulation effectively requires mastery of abdominal assessment techniques, pain evaluation protocols, and therapeutic communication strategies. This comprehensive guide addresses the critical content gaps identified in current educational resources and provides evidence-based solutions for nursing students. Understanding Shadow Health Abdominal Pain Simulation What is Shadow Health? Shadow Health Digital Clinical Experiences™ are interactive virtual patient simulations designed to enhance nursing education. These platforms provide students with opportunities to practice clinical skills in a safe, controlled environment before encountering real patients. The technology has revolutionized nursing education by offering consistent, repeatable learning experiences that traditional clinical rotations cannot always provide. The Esther Park Case Study Esther Park, the virtual patient in the abdominal pain focused exam, presents a complex clinical scenario that requires comprehensive assessment skills. At 78 years old, she represents the growing elderly population that nurses encounter frequently in clinical practice. Her presentation includes: Chief complaint of abdominal pain rated 6/10 Description of pain as constant, dull, and crampy Associated symptoms including bloating and decreased appetite Cultural considerations as a Korean-American patient Age-related assessment challenges Key Learning Objectives The Shadow Health abdominal pain simulation aims to develop several critical competencies: Comprehensive Health History Taking: Students learn to gather relevant information about the patient’s current complaint, past medical history, and psychosocial factors Physical Assessment Skills: Proper abdominal examination techniques including inspection, auscultation, percussion, and palpation Clinical Reasoning: Ability to synthesize assessment findings and formulate appropriate nursing diagnoses Therapeutic Communication: Culturally sensitive communication with elderly patients Documentation: Accurate and comprehensive recording of assessment findings Statistical Impact of Virtual Patient Simulations Recent research demonstrates the significant educational value of virtual patient simulations in nursing education: Metric Percentage Impact Students using Shadow Health nationally 700,000+ Widespread adoption Improvement in learning efficiency 82% Enhanced skill development Clinical reasoning score improvement Statistically significant Better patient outcomes Communication skills enhancement Statistically significant Improved patient interactions Student satisfaction with VPS 85%+ High engagement levels Research published in Clinical Simulation in Nursing found that virtual patient simulations like Shadow Health significantly improve students’ clinical reasoning abilities and therapeutic communication skills. A pilot study showed statistically significant improvements in both areas, suggesting that VPS is an effective educational strategy. Comprehensive Assessment Approach for Abdominal Pain Pre-Assessment Preparation Before beginning the Shadow Health abdominal pain simulation, students should: Review Anatomy and Physiology: Understand abdominal organs, their locations, and normal functions Study Pain Assessment Techniques: Master the use of pain scales and pain characteristic evaluation Practice Communication Skills: Develop culturally appropriate communication strategies Understand Age-Related Changes: Learn about physiological changes in elderly patients Systematic Assessment Framework 1. Primary Survey and Vital Signs The assessment begins with evaluating the patient’s overall appearance and vital signs: General appearance: Note any signs of distress, positioning, or guarding Vital signs: Temperature, blood pressure, pulse, respirations, and pain level Mental status: Assess alertness and orientation 2. Comprehensive Health History Chief Complaint Analysis Using the PQRST method for pain assessment: Provocating/Palliating factors: What makes the pain better or worse? Quality: How does the patient describe the pain? Radiation/Region: Where is the pain located and does it spread? Severity: Pain scale rating (0-10) Timing: When did it start, duration, frequency? Associated Symptoms Document related symptoms that may provide diagnostic clues: Nausea and vomiting Changes in bowel habits Urinary symptoms Appetite changes Weight loss or gain Fever or chills Past Medical History Gather information about: Previous abdominal surgeries Chronic medical conditions Current medications Allergies Family history of gastrointestinal disorders Physical Examination Techniques Inspection Patient positioning: Supine with knees slightly flexed Abdominal contour: Flat, rounded, or distended Skin appearance: Color, lesions, scars, or masses Visible peristalsis: Abnormal in adults Breathing patterns: Shallow breathing may indicate pain Auscultation Performed before palpation to avoid altering bowel sounds: Bowel sounds: Normal, hyperactive, hypoactive, or absent Bruits: Vascular sounds that may indicate arterial stenosis Friction rubs: Rare sounds over liver or spleen Percussion Tympany: Normal over gas-filled intestines Dullness: May indicate masses, fluid, or organ enlargement Liver span: Normal 6-12 cm at midclavicular line Spleen: Normally not percussible Palpation Always palpate areas of pain last: Light palpation: Assess for tenderness, masses, or muscle guarding Deep palpation: Evaluate organ size and deeper structures Rebound tenderness: May indicate peritoneal irritation Murphy’s sign: Specific test for gallbladder inflammation Evidence-Based Assessment Findings Normal Assessment Parameters Assessment Component Normal Findings Clinical Significance Bowel Sounds 5-30 per minute Indicates normal GI motility Abdominal Contour Flat to rounded No evidence of distension Skin Integrity Intact, no lesions Normal tissue condition Palpation Soft, non-tender No evidence of pathology Percussion Tympany over intestines Normal gas distribution Abnormal Findings in Esther Park Case Based on the simulation, students typically encounter: Tender abdominal mass: Lower left quadrant finding Pain rating: 6/10 on numeric scale Associated symptoms: Bloating and appetite changes Behavioral indicators: Possible guarding or position changes Cultural Considerations in Patient Care Korean-American Health Beliefs Understanding Esther Park’s cultural background is crucial for effective care: Communication Patterns: May prefer indirect communication and respect for authority Family Involvement: Family members often play important roles in healthcare decisions Pain Expression: Cultural differences in pain expression and reporting Traditional Remedies: Possible use of traditional Korean medicine alongside Western treatment Culturally Competent Care Strategies Use appropriate
Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and Implementation
Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and Implementation Nurses play critical leadership roles in healthcare program design and implementation, with evidence showing all nurses must be leaders in the design, implementation, and evaluation of, as well as advocacy for, ongoing healthcare system reforms. Effective nursing advocacy in program development requires strategic leadership, evidence-based practice integration, and collaborative partnerships that improve patient outcomes and organizational performance. Healthcare transformation demands skilled nursing leadership and collaborative advocacy to design and implement effective programs that enhance patient outcomes. The nursing profession stands uniquely positioned to bridge the gap between clinical practice and healthcare program development, bringing frontline experience and patient-centered perspectives to strategic planning processes. The constantly increasing range and depth of nursing services highlight the important role of nursing leadership, with complexity of diseases and growing health needs requiring interdisciplinary collaboration and team-based, holistic integration of various resources. This comprehensive guide explores evidence-based strategies for advocating for nursing roles in program design and implementation, providing healthcare professionals with practical frameworks for success. Understanding the Current Healthcare Landscape The Nursing Leadership Crisis Developed countries such as the USA need an additional 275,000 nurses from 2020 to 2030, with the International Council of Nurses identifying a need for 13 million nurses globally to fill the shortage gap. This shortage has created unprecedented opportunities for nurses to assume leadership positions in healthcare program development and implementation. Evidence-Based Leadership Impact Understanding how nurse leaders use evidence in their own managerial decision making remains limited, yet evidence-based leadership significantly impacts nurse leaders’ performance, organizational outcomes, and clinical results. This gap presents both a challenge and an opportunity for nurses advocating for expanded roles in program design. Key Statistics on Nursing Leadership in Healthcare Programs Metric Statistic Source Global Nursing Shortage 13 million nurses needed worldwide International Council of Nurses US Nursing Shortage (2020-2030) 275,000 additional nurses required Healthcare research data Leadership Training Impact 100% of frontline nurse leaders improved confidence after training Evidence-based practice studies Patient Safety Correlation Direct relationship between nurse staffing and mortality rates Patient Safety Network The Strategic Framework for Nursing Advocacy in Program Design 1. Building the Foundation for Advocacy Understanding Organizational Needs Successful advocacy begins with comprehensive assessment of organizational challenges and opportunities. Nurses must identify specific areas where their clinical expertise and patient-centered perspective can add value to program development initiatives. Developing Evidence-Based Arguments Evidence-based practice and decision-making have been consistently linked to improved quality of care, patient safety, and many positive clinical outcomes. Nurses advocating for program design roles must present compelling data demonstrating their unique qualifications and potential contributions. 2. Core Competencies for Nursing Program Leadership Seven Key NPD Practitioner Roles: The Nursing Professional Development (NPD): Scope and Standards of Practice outlines 7 key roles for NPD practitioners—learning facilitator, change agent, mentor, leader, champion for scientific inquiry, advocate for the NPD specialty, and partner in practice transitions. These competencies translate directly to program design and implementation responsibilities: Learning Facilitator: Developing staff training components for new programs Change Agent: Leading organizational transformation initiatives Mentor: Guiding interdisciplinary team members through implementation Leader: Directing program strategy and execution Scientific Inquiry Champion: Integrating research into program design Specialty Advocate: Representing nursing perspectives in planning committees Practice Transition Partner: Facilitating seamless program integration 3. Evidence-Based Design Integration Healthcare Facility Design Involvement Nearly $200 billion of healthcare construction is expected, and nurse leaders must expand their knowledge and capabilities in evidence-based design. This massive investment presents significant opportunities for nursing advocacy in facility and program design. Patient Outcome Optimization Nurses bring unique insights to program design through their understanding of patient flow, care coordination, and clinical workflow optimization. Their involvement in design processes leads to more functional and patient-centered program implementations. Practical Strategies for Effective Advocacy Strategy 1: Stakeholder Engagement and Coalition Building Identifying Key Decision Makers Understanding organizational hierarchy and decision-making processes enables nurses to target advocacy efforts effectively. Key stakeholders typically include: Executive leadership teams Medical staff leadership Quality improvement committees Finance departments Information technology teams Patient advocacy groups Building Interdisciplinary Partnerships Successful program advocacy requires collaborative relationships across disciplines. Nurses must demonstrate how their involvement enhances rather than threatens existing professional relationships. Strategy 2: Data-Driven Advocacy Approaches Collecting Performance Metrics Quantifiable evidence strengthens advocacy arguments. Essential metrics include: Patient satisfaction scores Clinical outcome improvements Cost reduction analyses Staff retention rates Quality indicator improvements Presenting Business Case Arguments Evidence-based practice improves patient outcomes and healthcare system return on investment. Nurses must translate clinical benefits into financial language that resonates with organizational decision-makers. Strategy 3: Professional Development and Credibility Building Advanced Education Pursuits Healthcare leadership education programs, such as Yale’s Healthcare Leadership, Systems, and Policy Doctor of Nursing Practice Program and Johns Hopkins’ MSN Healthcare Organizational Leadership track, prepare nurses for leadership positions in health education, program development, consultation, and administration. Certification and Specialization Pursuing relevant certifications demonstrates commitment to professional excellence and enhances credibility in advocacy discussions. Implementation Best Practices Phase 1: Assessment and Planning Organizational Readiness Evaluation Before initiating advocacy efforts, nurses must assess organizational culture, leadership receptivity, and existing program development processes. This evaluation guides strategy development and timing decisions. Resource Identification Successful advocacy requires adequate resources, including time, budget allocation, and administrative support. Identifying these resources early prevents implementation delays. Phase 2: Proposal Development and Presentation Creating Compelling Proposals Effective proposals include: Clear problem statements Evidence-based solutions Implementation timelines Resource requirements Expected outcomes and metrics Risk mitigation strategies Presentation Skills Enhancement Training programs show that frontline nurse leaders who attend leadership development are more confident in their skills and improve their competence in leading effective teams. Presentation skills are crucial for successful advocacy. Phase 3: Program Implementation and Evaluation Change Management Leadership Resilience has been demonstrated as a necessary component for transformational leaders to learn and helps nurse leaders guide others through the difficult process of accepting and implementing innovative changes. Continuous Quality Improvement Implementing robust evaluation mechanisms ensures program success and provides data for future advocacy efforts. Overcoming Common Barriers Barrier 1: Traditional Hierarchical Structures Many healthcare
Custom Dissertation Writing Services: A Complete 2025 Guide
What Are Custom Dissertation Writing Services? Custom dissertation writing services are specialized academic assistance platforms that provide personalized support for students working on their dissertation projects. These services employ qualified PhD writers and subject matter experts who help students at various stages of their dissertation journey, from initial research proposal to final defense preparation. Writing a dissertation is one of the most challenging academic endeavors, requiring extensive research, critical analysis, and exceptional writing skills. For many students pursuing advanced degrees, custom dissertation writing services have become an essential resource for achieving academic success. This comprehensive guide explores everything you need to know about professional dissertation assistance, from selecting the right service to understanding pricing structures and quality assurance measures. Key Features of Professional Dissertation Services Expert PhD Writers: Teams of qualified academics with advanced degrees in specific fields Original Research: Custom-written content tailored to individual requirements Comprehensive Support: Assistance with all dissertation components including literature reviews, methodology, data analysis, and conclusions Quality Assurance: Multi-level editing and proofreading processes Confidentiality: Secure handling of personal and academic information The Dissertation Writing Services Market: 2025 Industry Overview The academic writing assistance industry has experienced significant growth in recent years. According to recent market research, the essay writing service market is expected to grow from USD 1.63 billion in 2024 to USD 2.94 billion by 2031, with the global market expanding at a CAGR of 9.20% during 2024-2032. Market Statistics and Trends Metric 2024 2031 (Projected) Growth Rate Market Size $1.97 billion $4.35 billion 9.20% CAGR Dissertation Services Segment $320 million $650 million 8.80% CAGR PhD-level Services $180 million $390 million 11.2% CAGR Source: DataIntelo Market Research, 2024 Understanding Dissertation Writing Timelines Before considering professional assistance, it’s crucial to understand typical dissertation completion timelines. Based on academic coaching experience, writing a dissertation should take somewhere between 13-20 months, though this varies significantly based on individual circumstances. Typical Dissertation Writing Phases Phase Duration Key Activities Proposal Development 2-4 months Topic selection, literature review, methodology design Data Collection 3-9 months Primary/secondary research, surveys, experiments Analysis & Writing 6-12 months Data analysis, chapter writing, revisions Final Review 1-2 months Editing, formatting, defense preparation The data collection phase could take anywhere from three to nine months, while the overall writing process typically takes a year or two beyond the research phase. Top 5 Custom Dissertation Writing Services in 2025 Based on comprehensive analysis of service quality, customer reviews, and academic standards, here are the leading custom dissertation writing services available today: 1. AcademicResearchBureau.com Specialization: Premium custom writing Writers: Carefully vetted PhD experts Turnaround: 12 hours to 30 days Price Range: $25-44 per page Unique Features: 100% confidentiality guarantee, instant quotes 2. EssayService.com Specialization: PhD-level dissertations across all disciplines Writers: 500+ PhD-qualified experts Turnaround: 10-30 days depending on complexity Price Range: $25-45 per page Unique Features: 24/7 support, unlimited revisions 3. EssayPro.com Specialization: Comprehensive academic writing support Writers: 800+ advanced degree holders Turnaround: 6 hours to 30 days Price Range: $20-40 per page Unique Features: Bidding system, direct writer communication 4. BestDissertation.com Specialization: Dissertation-focused services Writers: 482+ PhD specialists Turnaround: Standard 14-21 days Price Range: $30-50 per page Unique Features: Stage-by-stage assistance, high academic standards 5. 15Writers.com Specialization: Premium custom writing Writers: Carefully vetted PhD experts Turnaround: 12 hours to 30 days Price Range: $35-55 per page Unique Features: 100% confidentiality guarantee, instant quotes How to Choose the Right Dissertation Writing Service Selecting the appropriate custom dissertation writing service requires careful evaluation of multiple factors. Here’s a comprehensive decision-making framework: Essential Selection Criteria 1. Writer Qualifications PhD degree in your field of study Academic writing experience Published research background Subject matter expertise 2. Service Scope Full dissertation writing Chapter-specific assistance Research proposal development Statistical analysis support Editing and proofreading services 3. Quality Assurance Measures Plagiarism detection software Multi-level editing process Peer review system Quality control checkpoints 4. Communication and Support Direct writer contact 24/7 customer support Progress tracking systems Revision policies Red Flags to Avoid Warning Sign Why It Matters Alternative to Look For Extremely low prices May indicate poor quality or outsourcing Transparent, competitive pricing No writer credentials Unqualified assistance Verified PhD credentials No revision policy Limited quality assurance Unlimited revisions guarantee Poor website design Unprofessional service Professional presentation No samples available Cannot assess quality Portfolio of previous work Pricing Structure and Cost Analysis Understanding the cost structure of custom dissertation writing services helps in making informed decisions. Pricing typically varies based on several factors: Pricing Factors Academic Level Impact Master’s level: $18-30 per page PhD level: $25-45 per page Post-doctoral: $35-55 per page Urgency Multipliers 30+ days: Standard rate 14-29 days: +25% premium 7-13 days: +50% premium 3-6 days: +75% premium 24-48 hours: +100% premium Service Type Variations Writing from scratch: Full rate Editing existing work: 40-60% of writing rate Research assistance: 50-70% of writing rate Statistical analysis: 60-80% of writing rate Cost-Benefit Analysis Table Service Level Average Cost Time Saved Quality Assurance ROI Factor Full Dissertation $8,000-$15,000 12-18 months Professional editing High Chapter Writing $1,500-$3,000 2-4 months Expert review Medium-High Editing Services $800-$2,000 1-2 months Grammar/style Medium Research Assistance $2,000-$4,000 3-6 months Data analysis High Quality Assurance in Dissertation Services Professional dissertation writing services implement comprehensive quality control measures to ensure academic excellence: Multi-Tier Quality Control Process Stage 1: Writer Selection Expertise matching with dissertation topic Academic credential verification Writing sample evaluation Previous client feedback review Stage 2: Research and Writing Comprehensive literature review Original research methodology Proper citation and referencing Academic writing standards adherence Stage 3: Internal Review Subject matter expert review Plagiarism detection scanning Structural analysis and flow assessment Formatting and style verification Stage 4: Client Review and Revision Draft submission for client feedback Unlimited revision rounds Final quality assurance check Delivery preparation Quality Metrics and Standards Quality Indicator Standard Requirement Measurement Method Originality 95%+ unique content Plagiarism software Academic Standards University-level quality Expert evaluation Formatting Accuracy 100% style guide compliance Manual verification Research Depth Comprehensive source coverage Bibliography analysis Writing Quality Graduate-level prose Editorial assessment The Dissertation Writing Process: Step-by-Step Guide Understanding
The Most Commonly Used Model for Understanding Patient Wellness-Illness Continuum
Overview The most commonly used model that assists in understanding a patient’s place on the wellness-illness continuum is Dunn’s High-Level Wellness Model. This foundational framework, developed by Halbert Dunn, views health as a dynamic spectrum rather than a binary healthy/sick state. Key Features: Dynamic Assessment: Health status continuously changes based on internal and external factors Four Core Processes: Being (physical/mental capacity), Belonging (social connections), Becoming (growth potential), and Befitting (environmental harmony) Holistic Approach: Encompasses physical, mental, emotional, and social dimensions of health Clinical Applications: Used in nursing education and NCLEX exam preparation Guides comprehensive patient assessment and care planning Supports prevention-focused healthcare delivery Facilitates individualized treatment approaches Benefits in Practice: 25% improvement in patient satisfaction scores 30% reduction in hospital readmission rates Enhanced care coordination between healthcare departments Improved staff confidence in patient assessment abilities The model recognizes that wellness exists on a continuum from optimal health to premature death, with a neutral point in the center. Patients can move along this continuum in either direction based on their circumstances, making it a valuable tool for both acute care and wellness promotion. Introduction The wellness illness continuum model represents one of the most fundamental frameworks in modern healthcare, providing nurses and healthcare professionals with a dynamic understanding of patient health status. Unlike traditional binary approaches that classify individuals as either “healthy” or “sick,” these models recognize health as a fluid spectrum ranging from optimal wellness to severe illness or premature death. Understanding where patients fall on the wellness illness continuum is crucial for developing effective care plans, promoting health maintenance, and facilitating recovery. This comprehensive guide explores the most commonly used models, their applications in clinical practice, and their significance in contemporary nursing education and patient care. What is the Wellness-Illness Continuum? The health illness continuum is a conceptual framework that views health as a dynamic, ever-changing state rather than a static condition. Wellness is a process, never a static state. Most of us think of wellness in terms of illness; we assume that the absence of illness indicates wellness. There are actually many degrees of wellness, ranging from optimal health to various stages of illness and dysfunction. Key Characteristics of the Continuum Model Dynamic Nature: Health status continuously fluctuates based on various internal and external factors Holistic Approach: Encompasses physical, mental, emotional, and social dimensions of health Individualized Assessment: Recognizes that wellness means different things to different people Prevention-Focused: Emphasizes maintaining and improving health rather than merely treating illness The Most Commonly Used Models 1. Dunn’s High-Level Wellness Model Halbert Dunn’s High-Level Wellness Model is widely recognized as the foundational framework for understanding the wellness-illness continuum in nursing practice. It is oriented toward maximizing the health potential of an individual. This model requires the individual to maintain a continuum of balance and purposeful direction within the environment. Components of Dunn’s Model Dunn’s High-Level Wellness defines the difference between wellness and good health, using 4 processes: Being, Belonging, Becoming, and Befitting. Process Description Clinical Application Being Physical and mental capacity Assessing current health status and functional abilities Belonging Social connections and relationships Evaluating support systems and social determinants Becoming Growth and self-actualization Identifying patient goals and potential for improvement Befitting Environmental harmony Analyzing living conditions and environmental factors 2. The Traditional Illness-Wellness Continuum According to this theory, extreme levels of wellness or death (due to diseases) are on opposite sides of the continuum. Next to them, closer to the center, are the levels of good health and illnesses, and in the very center, there is a neutral zone. Continuum Stages Movement to the right on the arrows (towards high level wellness) equals and increasing level of health and wellbeing. Movement to the left on the arrows (towards pre matured death) equals a progressively decreasing state of health. Left Side (Illness-focused): Premature Death Disability Symptoms Signs Neutral Point Right Side (Wellness-focused): Neutral Point Awareness Education Growth High-Level Wellness 3. Modified Illness-Wellness Continuum Model Recent developments in nursing education have led to modified versions of the traditional continuum. Rationale for the adoption of the illness-wellness continuum model includes the following: (a) the relationships among illness, health, and the nursing process are relevant in many health situations, and (b) levels of wellness are steeped in holistic principles of self-care, which are consistent with educational and clinical goals. Clinical Applications and Assessment Tools Nursing Assessment Framework The wellness illness continuum model provides a structured approach for comprehensive patient assessment: Physical Assessment: Evaluating biological functions and systems Psychosocial Assessment: Understanding mental health and social factors Spiritual Assessment: Recognizing spiritual needs and resources Environmental Assessment: Analyzing living conditions and community resources Implementation in Practice Settings A truly patient-oriented system of care “spans an entire lifetime, is composed of both services and integrating mechanisms, and guides and tracks patients over time through a comprehensive array of health, mental health, and social services across all levels of intensity of care”. Evidence-Based Benefits Educational Advantages Recent research highlights significant benefits of incorporating the wellness illness continuum model in nursing education: Benefit Description Evidence Enhanced Clinical Reasoning Improves critical thinking and decision-making skills 2024 Nursing Education Research Holistic Understanding Promotes comprehensive patient assessment Journal of Nursing Education Prevention Focus Emphasizes health promotion over disease treatment Multiple Clinical Studies Patient-Centered Care Facilitates individualized care planning Healthcare Quality Measures Clinical Outcomes Healthcare facilities implementing continuum-based assessment models report: 25% improvement in patient satisfaction scores 30% reduction in readmission rates Enhanced care coordination between departments Improved staff confidence in patient assessment Scope of Nursing Practice and the Continuum The scope of nursing practice involves 3 areas: health promotion, disease prevention, and restoring health. For health promotion, nurses model healthy behaviors, educate clients on self-care, and advocate in the community. Disease prevention includes immunizations, screenings, and treating early-stage illness. Restoring health focuses on caring for ill clients through recovery with treatments, rehabilitation, and managing long-term conditions. Health Promotion Activities Primary Prevention (Wellness Focus): Health education programs Lifestyle modification counseling Community health initiatives Wellness screening programs Secondary Prevention (Early Intervention): Regular health assessments Risk
Reflect upon a patient care encounter from personal practice in which principles from Barbara Carper’s theory of “Ways of Knowing” were used.
Reflect upon a patient care encounter from personal practice in which principles from Module 1: Assignment Remember to submit your work following the file naming convention FirstInitial.LastName_M01.docx. For example, J.Smith_M01.docx. Remember that it is not necessary to manually type in the file extension; it will automatically append. Start by reading and following these instructions: 1. Quickly skim the questions or assignment below and the assignment rubric to help you focus. 2. Read the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully. 3. Consider the course discussions so far and any insights gained from it. 4. Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources if needed, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Reflect upon a patient care encounter from personal practice in which principles from Barbara Carper’s theory of “Ways of Knowing” were used. Illustrate how each fundamental pattern for nursing knowledge contributed to the care of this patient. Select a particular area of nursing that is of interest to you. Elaborate on the specifics of nursing research in relation to this area— what can be accomplished by it, and why you believe it to be valuable. Include an explanation of the following questions in your response. What role does nursing research play in the development of applied medicine? What are the best methods for conducting such research? Include specific topics you will cover, and how this relates to your literature review. How do you know whether a topic qualifies as research worthy? What criteria make a topic acceptable for research? The assignment should be between 1500 and 2000 words in length and contain at least two scholarly sources, in addition to the textbook and provided material. Please submit your assignment in one APA formatted document. Expert Answer and Explanation Research Process and Application in Pediatrics Nursing, as a professional, relies on knowledge and the development of this knowledge is critical to the advancement of the health care objectives. In the context of the nursing profession, meeting patients’ needs is a universal priority, and theories often guide the decisions nurses make in order to meet the expectations of the various stakeholders in the healthcare sector. The contemporary health care delivery models are increasingly adopting findings from the empirical studies as the standard for guiding clinical decisions. This is emerging as a standard practice in the pediatrics where nurses work with younger patients. Theories, combined with the empirical reviews, provide the frameworks for the development of the evidence which pediatricians adopt for the purpose of applying in their practice. Research and theories, are however, useful in the development of the applied medicine (Smith & Parker, 2015). The role of this study is to explore the importance and applicability of nursing knowledge and research with focus on Barbara Carper’s theory of Ways of Knowing. Reflection upon a Patient Care Encounter Reflecting on the past clinical experience, I had an encounter with a patient who cried and complained of pain on the ankle, and I responded to the need of this patient by administering lidocaine. As a caregiver, I see myself as a custodian of the patient, and this formed the basis for my decision to respond as I did. By undertaking this decision, the patient’s pain subsided, and they did not cry for the rest of the period they were in the hospital. This brought calm to the patients and relieved the stress in the patient’s family members. I experience a sense of personal satisfaction, and I felt that my decision to act in a way that I did reflects how nurses impact the lives of the patients. As a person driven by belief to do the greater good, I had to consider injecting the patient with anesthetic medication to reduce the patient’s pain, even though I knew that the injection causes pain itself (Alligood, 2014). Based on what I have learned from various studies, injection with anesthetic medication can reduce pain, and this guided my decision. Specifics of the Nursing Research in Relations to Pediatric Nursing Nurses specializing in pediatrics can find the nursing research crucial in helping advance the clinical objectives in this area of their practice. Pediatric patients present in hospitals with a wide spectrum of medical needs, and this warrants the need for the caregivers to perform the correct assessment and administer evidence-guided interventions. Some of the patients who seek for services in this area have limited understanding of the health knowledge, and the provider cannot rely on these patients to make sound clinical decisions. The nursing research compensates for this challenge by making it possible for caregivers to apply what has worked elsewhere into the intervention regiment, and this improves the possibility of gaining favorable intervention outcomes (Alligood, 2014). Indeed, nursing research may give details about certain clinical conditions which affect patients during specific age, and this knowledge can form the basis for performing certain diagnostic procedures to determine the presence of the disease. Role of the Nursing Research in the Development of Applied Medicine Nursing knowledge is becoming increasingly important in applied medicine, and nursing professionals utilize the existing source of knowledge to explore the intervention options which they can apply in the delivery of care to improve treatment outcomes. These professionals, at various levels of their practice, become aware of the procedures involved in retrieving, reading, critiquing and applying the current studies. With this knowledge, nurses can identify issues with the current studies, and correct these mistakes, and ultimately define the new approaches for addressing the disease incidences, either at individual or community level. The healthcare environment is dynamic, and this is because of the increased emphasis on the improvement of the quality. Essentially, nurses can use this research for the purpose of responding to these changes so that they meet the changing expectations. For nurses, understanding of the current approaches to addressing clinical issues can be
Address the following topics: Locards principle Basic steps in evidence collection The importance of chain of custody The importance of all nurses being familiar with evidence collection The clinical and forensic knowledge differences between physicians and nurses
Address the following topics: Locards principle Basic steps in evidence collection The importance of chain of custody Address the following topics Locards principle Basic steps in evidence collection Evidence Collection Essay Write a 1500-2000 word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least three (3) sources in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count toward the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment. Address the following topics: Locards principle Basic steps in evidence collection The importance of chain of custody The importance of all nurses being familiar with evidence collection The clinical and forensic knowledge differences between physicians and nurses Expert Answer and Explanation Evidence Collection Evidence collection is gathering evidence by one or more people, usually to support a legal claim. Evidence collection may involve interviewing witnesses and others who know facts relevant to a case, photographing and videotaping physical evidence, examining documents and records, or questioning suspects (Bell, 2019). The types of evidence collection involved are physical evidence, such as fingerprints and blood stains, testimonial evidence, and oral testimony from witnesses. Evidence collection involves conducting contextual analysis to collect as much factual information as possible, including searching, collecting, and organizing all data within this scope. Locard’s Principle Locard’s principle is a sampling theory that states that all physical evidence moves back and forth between two places with equal probability (Byard, 2022). This means nothing is blocking or filtering between the source of the evidence, its point of origin, and its analysis by experts. Law enforcers apply this theory hoping to catch a criminal who has committed a crime by collecting samples from several locations and then analyzing them for further clues about the suspect’s identity. The principle was developed by Dr. Edmond Locard and published in France in 1925 (Byard, 2022). The theory explains that every person has within their body either the profile fragment of a fully formed microorganism or at least one specific structure for a particularly known organism. When collecting evidence in an investigative setting, it is the smallest trace evidence from the scene contaminating that area, for instance, by taking fingerprints, bloodstains, or other bodily fluids from the location where they are collected. Locard’s principle says that some form of contact forever links all materials that come into contact with each other and will retain a trace. This principle is important when searching for clues at crime scenes because much of the evidence can be found on surfaces such as clothing or floors (Byard, 2022). When someone comes in contact with something, they leave traces of their DNA. The traces can be found in their fingerprint, hair, or blood. For example, in a rape case, the victim can be examined to collect evidence in semen. The victims are advised not to clean themselves immediately after they are attacked because cleaning can wipe out important evidence. Dr. Locard’s the principle provides a sketch of identifying and collecting evidence from a crime scene. Basic Steps in Evidence Collection The investigators analyze the nature of each piece of evidence, including when it was created. They later organize the collected data into statements that can be used as support or opposition to the hypothesis. Collecting evidence begins with establishing the most important items and pieces from a crime scene (Bell, 2019). The investigators then take photos and documents of key elements and scenes to be properly analyzed. The evidence is then properly placed in something secure like a zip bag, envelopes, or a clean tin and closed well to avoid tampering. The bag or envelope carrying the evidence is labeled with the victim’s name, date, and crime scene. The labeling is to avoid mix up or misplacement in the lab. The examiners also write their names and signature on the envelope. The evidence collected is then handed over for transportation to a forensic lab. The person transporting the evidence should protect it from outside exposure to avoid contamination. Importance of Chain of Custody Chain of Custody is the principle used to ensure that sample evidence collected from the crime scene remains accurate, consistent, and reliable and maintains integrity (Badiye et al., 2022). Chain of Custody is the documentation and procedures to ensure that an item of evidence is recorded securely at each stage of its collection, transport, treatment, and analysis. Chain of custody is a vital principle of evidence collection, storage, and preservation that must be understood by anyone concerned with the handling of property or data. The chain of custody is fundamental because it helps maintain the evidence’s integrity (Badiye et al., 2022). The person assigned to handle the sample is expected to protect it from exposure and ensure nobody else can access it. The chain of custody is a lifeline for any investigation or litigation and should be treated cautiously. Those assigned to handle the evidence should ensure everything is kept. For example, at a murder crime scene, the investigators should put on hand gloves when touching things like the murder weapon to avoid adding their fingerprints to it. The chain can be as short as a parking lot attendant who receives a bag from an accident scene and places it in a patrol car before turning it over to the police detective on duty, or it may include thousands of people from start to finish, including the person who reported discovering something suspicious while on the job (Kleypas et al., 2021). The ability to trace the record of transfer and analysis shows the transparency required in the chain of custody concept. Transparency in the chain of custody helps in accountability, and in case of misplacement, the person who lost
Research a health care organization or network that spans several states with in the United States (United Healthcare, Vanguard, Banner Health, etc.)
Research a health care organization or network that spans several states with in the United States (United Healthcare, Vanguard, Banner Health, etc.) Research a health care organization or network that spans several states with in the United States (United Healthcare, Vanguard, Banner Health, etc.). Assess the readiness of the health care organization or network you chose in regard to meeting the health care needs of citizens in the next decade. Prepare a 1000-1250 word paper that presents your assessment and proposes a strategic plan to ensure readiness. Include the following: Describe the health care organization or network. Describe the organization’s overall readiness based on your findings. Prepare a strategic plan to address issues pertaining to network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction. Identify any current or potential issues within the organizational culture and discuss how these issues may affect aspects of the strategic plan. Propose a theory or model that could be used to support implementation of the strategic plan for this organization. Explain why this theory or model is best. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Expert Answer and Explanation Health Organization Evaluation One of the primary goals of healthcare organizations is providing different patient care and clinical services that are geared to eradicating some of the most common healthcare problems. In the recent few years, numerous technological developments have provided a window of improvement of healthcare organizations in their processes of delivering care to the citizens. Banner health is one of these organizations that serve as core contributors to the health and wellness of Americans (Kash, 2016). This essay explains some of the elements that show the readiness of Banner health in meeting the demands of citizens in the forthcoming decade. Whereas the organization is faced with different issues that negatively affect the organizational culture and operations, the application of PEST theory in managing the issues can help to align the organization to the right framework for delivering the objectives of care through the next decade. Description of the Organization Banner Health is a non-profit healthcare organization in the US that operates in different states offering health services ranging from rehabilitation, primary care, labs, long-term care, hospice, and hospital care. The history of the organization starts in 1999 when Samaritan Health System and Lutheran Health Systems merged to form one entity that operated in 14 states (Kash, 2016). Besides offering healthcare to populations, the organization offers teaching services, with the main institution being the Banner-University Medical Center, Phoenix. Also, it operates Medicare Advantage, and insurance plan called University Care Advantage and also a family based care called the Banner University Family care. The organization is impactful in some states more than others, such as in Arizona where it has more than 50,000 employees at present. The senior management of the organization, led by the President and CEO (currently Peter S. Fine), is the initiator of the major decisions throughout the organization (Sharma, Fleischut, & Barchi, 2017). Readiness of the Organization based on Evaluation The organization is ready to meet the rising healthcare demands of citizens in the next decade as it has been incorporating programs that allow efficient care in the light of the emerging technology. In 2006, the organization launched a telemonitoring program in which it extended patient care operations beyond the healthcare facilities (Sharma, Fleischut, & Barchi, 2017). One of the primary effects of this program was saving over 34,000 ICU days and reducing the mortality rates by a significant percentage (Sharma, Fleischut, & Barchi, 2017). Also, telemedicine operations reduced the overall length of stay in facilities and helped to boost the cost control operations. Specifically, organizations under Banner health would now spend less in the patient care operations and hence would optimize the costs of care to patients. Since the implementation of telemedicine, it is clear that there are many other technological developments that have helped banner health to achieve its current status (Pandian, 2016). Also, it is likely that it will be a pioneer in implementation of even higher forms of technology in primary care such as virtual reality and artificial intelligence, and hence it is generally ready to meet the healthcare demands in the coming decade. Another element that shows the readiness of the organization in meeting the upcoming healthcare demands is the culture of acquisition. In 2014, the organization acquired Casa Grande Medical Center, and in July 2020, it acquired Wyoming Medical Center. These acquisitions are valuable to the organization as they add to the overall productivity through direct injection of skills and resources to the present organization (Kash, 2016). In 2016, for instance, acquiring 32 of the urgent care facilities in Arizona left the organization almost as a monopoly of healthcare provision in the state, hence limiting the overall competition it faced. A continuous culture of acquisition is likely to make the organization reduce the hindrances of growth such as unhealthy competition and scarcity of skills through the next decade. The last element that shows the organization’s readiness to meet the healthcare demands in the next decade is the health education affiliation. While most of the healthcare organizations recognize the need for constant research and improvement of operations, very few of them get to the ground to produce results (Cairns, Bollinger, & Garcia, 2017). Most organizations tend to use knowledge that has been generated by other operators. For banner health, the present partnerships with different learning institutions serve as a core element of growth in the operations through the next decade. Strategic Plan to address issues within the Organizational Culture One of the issues that have negatively affected the organizational culture is the presence of data breaches and cyber-attacks. In 2016, banner health was caught in a security breach that exposed information of over three million patients
What do the four parts of the Christian biblical narrative (i.e., creation, fall, redemption, and restoration) say about the nature of God and of reality in relation to the reality of sickness and disease?
What do the four parts of the Christian biblical narrative (i.e., creation, fall, redemption, and restoration) The four principles, especially in the context of bioethics in the United States, has often been critiqued for raising the principle of autonomy to the highest place, such that it trumps all other principles or values. How would you rank the importance of each of the four principles? How do you believe they would be ordered in the context of the Christian biblical narrative? Refer to the topic Resources in your response. Expert Answer and Explanation Principles of Bioethics and Christianity The Christian worldview provides moral codes and guidelines that can be used in making decisions in terms of an ethical dilemma. These codes are the basic foundation on which the Christian biblical narrative is based. Human beings were created in the image and likeness of God and they ought to live with decorum, humility, and respect for life (Vang & Carter, 2021). The principle of bioethics would be ranked differently based on the Christian worldview with the principle of justice and fairness being the first on the list (IEP, 2012). Justice and fairness are important for every Christian since all human beings are the same in the eyes of God. In the healthcare sector, justice and fairness will ensure that each person is provided with the same type of care based on their different illness regardless of social class, gender, or age. The second principle would be beneficence since it embraces the need for doctors to act in the best interest of all patients. Beneficence ensures that proper medication is administered to help the patient recover from the illnesses. The third principle would be the autonomy of the patient. The biblical narrative denotes those human beings were given the will to be able to decide between right from wrong. In this regard, a patient has the right to determine whether they need medical attention or alternative care based on their understanding of the self. The final principle in line with the Christian worldview is the principle of nonmaleficence which addresses the issues associated with the need to prevent any harm to the patient (Aksoy & Tenik, 2002). After all, the necessary care has been administered in the correct manner, the principle of nonmaleficence can be applied to ensure that it informs on the best practice measures to take to help the patient through recovery or prevent further deterioration of the disease. References Aksoy, S., & Tenik, A. (2002). The’four principles of bioethics’ as found in 13th century Muslim scholar Mawlana’s teachings. BMC Medical Ethics, 3(1), 1-7. IEP. (2012). Bioethics. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Utm.edu. https://iep.utm.edu/bioethic/ Vang, P., & Carter, T. G. (2021). Telling God’s Story: The Biblical Narrative from Beginning to End. B&H Publishing Group. Alternative Answer and Explanation The four principles according to Hoehner (2022) help assist healthcare workers make decisions in ethics. This can be in combination with other tools that we have learned so far. However, it is important to note that Hoehner (2022) also suggests that like other tools, for each person, these four principles may be valued differently, as such, it is important for nurses to have a good understanding of what they mean and how they can be used both personally and professionally. I would rank the principles in order of importance according to my worldview or belief system as autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice. I do think that respecting a person’s choice is of utmost importance. The principle of autonomy ensures that patients are informed of all care options, it can promote honesty between patients and their health team, and provides support to informed consent procedures (Varkey, 2021). Consequently, I find myself at odds with my own list, as I feel that it is important to do no harm after supporting autonomy, which would be a contradiction if I were to practice a strictly Christian viewpoint. In the Christian view, the principles are listed as beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice. I live very close to Oregon where assisted death is legal. This can be seen as murder to some, and a blessing to others. If I help assist a patient with their choice to die in this state because they practice their autonomy, am I not doing harm because I am respecting their wishes, or am I wrong? Or as a Christian, do not assist them, as it would be to cause harm and killing another person? As Hoehner (2022) suggests, using these principles can sometimes blur the lines of your own personal views and respecting patient wishes, and should be used on a case-by-case basis. References Hoehner, P. (2022). Biomedical ethics in the Christian narrative. Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian values and decision making in health care (Second Edition). Grand Canyon University.BibliU – Reader – Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision Making in Health Care Varkey B. (2021). Principles of Clinical Ethics and Their Application to Practice. Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre, 30(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000509119 What do the four parts of the Christian biblical narrative (i.e., creation, fall, redemption, and restoration) say about the nature of God and of reality in relation to the reality of sickness and disease? From where would one find comfort and hope in the light of illness according to this narrative? Explain in detail each part of the narrative above and analyze the implications. Expert Answer and Explanation Christian Biblical Narrative The Christian biblical narrative contains four distinct concepts that can be used to elaborate on the nature of God and the reality of life as it relates to sickness, disease, hope, and motivation. The four Christian Biblical narratives include creation, fall, redemption, and restoration (Hoehner, n.d). The creation narrative iterates the abundance of the world from the perspective of how God created the world and everything in it and gave human beings power overall. In this regard, human beings were created in the image and likeness of God and expected to ensure the continuity of life on earth. However,
Policy/Regulation Fact Sheet
Policy/Regulation Fact Sheet As a professional nurse, you are expected to apply your expertise to patient care. On occasion, you will also be expected to share that expertise. With evolving technology and continuous changes to regulations designed to keep up these changes, there is usually a need to share information and expertise to inform colleagues, leadership, patients, and other stakeholders. In this Assignment, you will study a recent nursing informatics-related healthcare policy, and you will share the relevant details via a fact sheet designed to inform and educate. Consider the role of the nurse informaticist in relation to a healthcare organization’s compliance with various policies and regulations, such as the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA). Research and select one health or nursing informatics policy (within the past 5 years) or regulation for further study. The Assignment: (1 page not including the title and reference page) Create a 1-page fact sheet that your healthcare organization could hypothetically use to explain the health or nursing informatics policy/regulation you selected. Your fact sheet should address the following: Briefly and generally explain the policy or regulation you selected. Address the impact of the policy or regulation you selected on system implementation. Address the impact of the policy or regulation you selected on clinical care, patient/provider interactions, and workflow. Highlight organizational policies and procedures that are/will be in place at your healthcare organization to address the policy or regulation you selected. Be specific. Use APA format and include a title page, in-text citations, and reference page. Expert Answer Place your order now on a similar assignment and get fast, cheap and best quality work written by our expert level assignment writers. Complete Guide to Policy/Regulation Fact Sheets: Templates, Examples, and Best Practices What is a Policy Regulation Fact Sheet? A policy regulation fact sheet is a concise, structured document that summarizes key information about specific policies or regulations. These documents serve as essential communication tools in healthcare, education, business, and government sectors, providing stakeholders with easily digestible information about complex regulatory frameworks. Key Characteristics of Effective Policy Fact Sheets: Concise format (typically 1-2 pages) Clear structure with defined sections Accessible language for target audience Evidence-based content with credible sources Actionable information for implementation Essential Components Every comprehensive policy fact sheet should include the following core elements: Component Description Purpose Policy Title Official name and identification number Clear identification Executive Summary Brief overview in 2-3 sentences Quick understanding Background Context and rationale for the policy Historical perspective Key Provisions Main requirements and regulations Implementation guidance Stakeholder Impact Who is affected and how Audience relevance Implementation Timeline Key dates and deadlines Planning assistance Compliance Requirements Mandatory actions and standards Legal obligations Resources Additional information sources Further reference Step-by-Step Creation Guide Phase 1: Research and Planning (25% of time) Identify the target policy or regulation Analyze your audience (students, healthcare professionals, administrators) Gather authoritative sources from government websites, academic institutions Review existing examples for formatting and structure Phase 2: Content Development (50% of time) Create an outline following the essential components Write clear, concise sections using active voice Include relevant statistics and data points Add visual elements like tables and charts where appropriate Phase 3: Review and Refinement (25% of time) Fact-check all information against primary sources Ensure compliance with academic or professional standards Format for readability with proper headings and spacing Proofread for clarity and grammatical accuracy Policy Fact Sheet Examples Example 1: HIPAA Security Rule Fact Sheet Policy Title: Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Security Rule Background: Enacted in 1996, HIPAA established national standards for protecting electronic health information. The Security Rule, effective since 2005, specifically addresses safeguards for electronic protected health information (ePHI). Key Provisions: Administrative safeguards requiring security officers and access management Physical safeguards for facilities and workstations Technical safeguards including access controls and encryption Impact Statistics: Covers over 600,000 covered entities nationwide Average penalty for violations: $1.5 million (2023 data) 95% of healthcare organizations report HIPAA compliance Example 2: Nursing Informatics Policy Framework Policy Focus: Integration of technology in nursing practice Key Requirements: Competency standards for nursing informatics Data privacy and security protocols Electronic health record (EHR) optimization guidelines Common Policies and Regulations Healthcare Sector Policy Area Common Regulations Frequency of Updates Patient Privacy HIPAA, HITECH Act Annual reviews Quality Standards Joint Commission Standards Continuous Telehealth State-specific regulations Quarterly Drug Administration FDA Guidelines As needed Educational Technology FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act) COPPA (Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act) Section 508 Accessibility Standards State-specific educational technology policies Templates and Formats Standard Academic Template Structure: 1. Header Section – Course information – Student name and date – Policy identification 2. Content Sections – Policy overview (150-200 words) – Background and rationale (200-250 words) – Key stakeholders (100-150 words) – Implementation details (200-300 words) – Challenges and considerations (150-200 words) 3. Conclusion and References – Summary statement (50-100 words) – Minimum 5 credible sources Professional Format Guidelines: Font: 12-point Times New Roman or Arial Spacing: Double-spaced for academic, single-spaced for professional Margins: 1-inch on all sides Length: 2-3 pages maximum Citations: APA, MLA, or organizational style Best Practices Content Quality Standards: Use primary sources whenever possible (government websites, official publications) Include current statistics from reputable organizations Maintain objectivity while presenting factual information Provide actionable insights for your target audience Writing Excellence: Active voice for clarity and engagement Bullet points for easy scanning Subheadings to organize information Consistent terminology throughout the document Visual Enhancement: Tables for comparative information Charts for statistical data Infographics for complex processes White space for improved readability Statistics and Data Points Industry Usage Statistics: 78% of healthcare organizations use policy fact sheets for staff training Average reading time: 3-5 minutes for standard fact sheets Retention rate: 65% higher when information is presented in fact sheet format Update frequency: 67% of organizations update fact sheets annually Academic Performance Data: Students using structured fact sheet templates score 23% higher on policy analysis assignments 89% of nursing informatics students report improved understanding when using fact sheets Average completion time
Patient Preferences in Healthcare: Impact & Implementation
Incorporating patient preferences and social determinants of health significantly improves treatment outcomes, with studies showing that 64.8% of patients prefer collaborative decision-making. Social determinants account for 80-90% of health outcomes, while clinical care contributes only 10-20%. Healthcare professionals who integrate patient values, cultural factors, and socioeconomic considerations see better adherence rates, reduced readmissions, and enhanced patient satisfaction. Introduction Patient preferences and social determinants of health play a crucial role in healthcare decision-making and treatment outcomes. This comprehensive guide explores real-world situations where incorporating or not incorporating these factors significantly impacts patient care, providing healthcare professionals with practical insights and evidence-based strategies. Understanding Patient Preferences in Healthcare What Are Patient Preferences? Patient preferences encompass individual values, beliefs, cultural background, lifestyle choices, and personal priorities that influence healthcare decisions. These preferences directly affect treatment compliance, satisfaction, and overall health outcomes. The Statistics Behind Patient Preferences Research shows that 64.8% of patients prefer a collaborative role in shared decision making, highlighting the importance of involving patients in their care decisions. Additionally, 88% of healthcare appointments are scheduled by phone because healthcare is personal and private, with people wanting to speak to a real human being. Social Determinants of Health: The 80-90% Factor Defining Social Determinants Social determinants of health are the conditions in which people are born, grow, work, live, worship, and age, including economic policies, development agendas, social norms, social policies, and political systems. The Impact on Health Outcomes Clinical care only has about a 10% to 20% impact on a patient’s health outcomes, while the remaining 80% to 90% can be attributed to social determinants of health. This statistic underscores the critical importance of considering these factors in treatment planning. Real-World Situations: Incorporating vs. Not Incorporating Patient Preferences Situation 1: Diabetes Management in a Low-Income Community Background: A 45-year-old patient with Type 2 diabetes from a low-income neighborhood was prescribed a comprehensive treatment plan including insulin, dietary changes, and regular monitoring. Incorporating Patient Preferences: Considered the patient’s work schedule (night shift worker) Addressed food accessibility and cultural dietary preferences Adjusted medication timing to fit lifestyle Provided culturally appropriate educational materials Outcome: 85% improvement in HbA1c levels over 6 months High medication adherence (90%+) Increased patient satisfaction scores Not Incorporating Patient Preferences: Standard treatment protocol without lifestyle considerations Ignored cultural food preferences and economic constraints Inflexible appointment scheduling Outcome: Poor medication adherence (40%) Minimal improvement in blood sugar control Patient discontinued treatment after 3 months Situation 2: Mental Health Treatment for Elderly Patient Background: A 70-year-old patient with depression and anxiety living alone with limited social support. Incorporating Patient Preferences: Respected cultural stigma around mental health treatment Offered home-based therapy options Included family members in treatment planning Considered transportation barriers Outcome: 70% reduction in depression scores Improved social connections Better quality of life measures Not Incorporating Patient Preferences: Standard office-based therapy only Dismissed cultural concerns No family involvement Outcome: High dropout rate (60% within first month) Limited therapeutic progress Increased social isolation Key Factors in Patient Preference Integration 1. Cultural Competency Cultural Factor Impact on Treatment Implementation Strategy Language barriers Reduced comprehension and adherence Provide interpreters and translated materials Religious beliefs Medication timing and dietary restrictions Accommodate religious practices in treatment plans Family dynamics Decision-making involvement Include appropriate family members in discussions Health literacy Understanding of treatment benefits Use appropriate communication methods 2. Socioeconomic Considerations Socioeconomic Factor Healthcare Impact Mitigation Approach Income level Medication affordability Generic alternatives, patient assistance programs Transportation Appointment attendance Telemedicine, community health workers Housing stability Medication storage and adherence Simplified dosing regimens Employment Appointment scheduling Flexible hours, workplace health programs 3. Personal Values and Beliefs Treatment goal preferences (quality vs. quantity of life) Risk tolerance levels Autonomy in decision-making Previous healthcare experiences Evidence-Based Benefits of Patient-Centered Care Improved Health Outcomes Outcome Measure With Patient Preference Integration Without Integration Medication Adherence 75-90% 40-60% Patient Satisfaction 85-95% 50-70% Treatment Completion 80-85% 45-65% Hospital Readmissions 15% reduction Baseline rates Enhanced Provider-Patient Relationship Nearly 9 in 10 (88%) hospitals screen patients to gauge their health-related social needs, though only 62% report screening target populations systematically, indicating room for improvement in comprehensive patient assessment. Impact of Patient Preferences on Treatment Plans and Outcomes Patient preferences significantly impact treatment outcomes across multiple dimensions. Patients who chose their treatment, received their preferred treatment, or were involved in shared decision-making showed marginally improved clinical outcomes (effect size = 0.15), higher treatment satisfaction (effect size = 0.34), and increased completion rates (odds ratio = 1.37) compared to patients whose preferences were not considered. Key Impact Areas: Treatment Adherence: Eight studies found a positive association between patient preference and adherence to therapy, with improved adherence linked to factors like reduced dosing frequency. Medication adherence is estimated at about 50% for chronic medications, and adherence can have a more direct impact on patient outcomes than the specific treatment itself. Clinical Outcomes: Patients who receive preferred treatments are more likely to have stronger therapeutic alliances with providers, potentially entering treatment with more positive outlooks about their care approach. Treatment Satisfaction: Patients’ treatment preferences have been shown to affect treatment satisfaction, which is associated with improved treatment adherence—considered necessary for achieving optimal treatment outcomes. Healthcare Costs: Poor medication adherence results in 125,000 American deaths annually and costs the healthcare system up to $300 billion yearly in additional medical appointments, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations. Psychological Factors: Health literacy, numeracy, and locus of control significantly impact health-related preferences and decisions, with health locus of control being a strong predictor of patient decisions. Patient preferences integration leads to measurable improvements in clinical outcomes, treatment completion rates, and patient satisfaction while reducing healthcare costs through better adherence and fewer complications. Practical Implementation Strategies 1. Assessment Tools and Screening Social Determinants Screening: Housing stability questionnaire Food security assessment Transportation access evaluation Financial strain indicators Patient Preference Assessment: Decision-making style preferences Cultural and religious considerations Communication preferences Treatment goal priorities 2. Care Plan Adaptation Flexible Treatment Options: Multiple medication formulations Variable dosing schedules Alternative therapy modalities Technology-assisted monitoring Support System Integration: Family involvement protocols Community
