Table of Contents
TogglePost a brief description of the situation you experienced and explain how incorporating
Discussion: Patient Preferences and Decision Making
Changes in culture and technology have resulted in patient populations that are often well informed and educated, even before consulting or considering a healthcare need delivered by a health professional. Fueled by this, health professionals are increasingly involving patients in treatment decisions. However, this often comes with challenges, as illnesses and treatments can become complex.
What has your experience been with patient involvement in treatment or healthcare decisions?
In this Discussion, you will share your experiences and consider the impact of patient involvement (or lack of involvement). You will also consider the use of a patient decision aid to inform best practices for patient care and healthcare decision making.
To Prepare:
- Review the Resources and reflect on a time when you experienced a patient being brought into (or not being brought into) a decision regarding their treatment plan.
- Review the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute’s Decision Aids Inventory at https://decisionaid.ohri.
ca/. - Choose “For Specific Conditions,” then Browse an alphabetical listing of decision aids by health topic.
NOTE: To ensure compliance with HIPAA rules, please DO NOT use the patient’s real name or any information that might identify the patient or organization/practice.
DISCUSSION QUESTION:
Significance of Incorporating Patient Preferences – Sample Answer
Reflection on the Experience
The situation I experienced involved an elderly patient that was recently diagnosed with hypertension. While having a conversation with the patient about their condition, they disclosed that they had gone through the information available online, and that they had learned something about the condition. As we explored different medication options, I recommended putting the patient on a treatment plan in which I would use short-acting nifedipine.
However, the patient expressed fears that taking the medication would cause cardiac complications because they learned from the internet resources the side effects of the drug. To better work with the patient, I acknowledged the safety issues linked to nifedipine use. I also involved them in exploring their values and preferences into the healthcare plan (Guasti et al., 2022). For instance, I explained alternative medication options, describing their adverse events and benefits.
The Impact of Patient Experience on the Trajectory of the Situation
The approach I took in which I integrated into the care process the patient’s preferences helped enhance my interaction with the patient. The patient was open and free in sharing information about his health like lifestyle. In preparing the treatment plan, I considered the details the patient provided (Bilen & Wenger, 2020). Adopting this approach made the patient comfortable working with me to establish interventions centered on the patient’s needs and preferences.
The Value of the Patient Decision Aid
The Hypertension Decision Support Tool is the patient decision aid I selected. The tool provides guideline including other pertinent information related to the management of hypertension. Relying on this kind of aid, one can better understand how to deliver hypertension care to selected populations because the aid reveals efficacy of certain medications in certain populations such as women with pregnancy (Oliveros et al., 2020).
References
Bilen, O., & Wenger, N. K. (2020). Hypertension management in older adults. F1000Research, 9, F1000 Faculty Rev-1003. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.20323.1.
Guasti, L., Ambrosetti, M., Ferrari, M., Marino, F., Ferrini, M., Sudano, I., Tanda, M. L., Parrini, I., Asteggiano, R., & Cosentino, M. (2022). Management of Hypertension in the Elderly and Frail Patient. Drugs & aging, 39(10), 763–772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-022-00966-7.
Oliveros, E., Patel, H., Kyung, S., Fugar, S., Goldberg, A., Madan, N., & Williams, K. A. (2020). Hypertension in older adults: Assessment, management, and challenges. Clinical cardiology, 43(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.23303.
Alternative Sample Answer
Description of the Situation I experienced
One of the encounters I have had involved working with a Chinese patient who preferred the use of acupuncture to relieve their pain. Informed by clinical practice guidelines, and clinical evidence, I incorporated the patient’s preferred pain management intervention into their treatment plan. I also relied on the information the patient provided to prepare the treatment plan (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). To administer the acupuncture, I involved an acupuncturist professional to perform the procedure in accordance with the patient’s preferences.
How incorporating the Patient Preferences and Values impacted the Outcomes of the Treatment Plan
By engaging the patient, and incorporating their preferences and values into the intervention plan, I managed to help them achieve optimal results in terms of clinical outcomes. By building a therapeutic relationship around patient-centered care, the patient was satisfied with their own care considering that they provided positive feedback. It also led to the decline in adverse patient events including the negative side effects associated with the use of pain medications such as nausea (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018).
How including Patient Preferences and Values might impact the Trajectory of the Situation and how they were reflected in the Treatment Plan
For providers, incorporating patients’ values and preferences into their care might affect the outcome of the situation since they become co-partners to their own treatment. With this kind of an arrangement, they are likely to develop positive attitude towards providers, and approve of the treatment they receive. This reflected in the treatment plan considering that they provided information that was useful in coming up with a meaningful intervention plan. For instance, the patient’s pain reduced following the use of the acupuncture. Because of this outcome, they experienced improvement in their overall physiological and emotional wellbeing given that the side effects that result due to the use of pain medications can hamper emotional and physiological wellness (Zheng et al., 2018).
The Value of the selected Patient Decision Aid Inventory in Professional Practice
The selected patient decision aid is a decision-support tool for osteoarthritis of the knee. The tool is a guide that provides providers and patients with information that they can use to manage pain. For patients, this particular tool is useful if they are thinking of starting the treatment of their osteoarthritis (The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 2019). One of the important aspects of the tool is that it can ease providers’ work because it provides them with information on how they can manage the condition.
References
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. (2019). Patient decision aids Links to an external site.. Retrieved from https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/
Zheng, H., Rosal, M. C., Li, W., Borg, A., Yang, W., Ayers, D. C., & Franklin, P. D. (2018). A Web-Based Treatment Decision Support Tool for Patients With Advanced Knee Arthritis: Evaluation of User Interface and Content Design. JMIR human factors, 5(2), e17. https://doi.org/10.2196/humanfactors.8568.
Place your order now for a similar assignment and get fast, cheap and best quality work written by our expert level assignment writers.
Use Coupon Code: NEW30 to Get 30% OFF Your First Order
Incorporating Patient Preferences in Treatment Plans
Introduction
Modern healthcare is shifting from a provider-centric model to one that places patients at the heart of decision-making. Incorporating patient preferences into treatment plans is not just a courtesy—it’s a clinical imperative. This article explores how honoring patient values leads to improved outcomes, greater satisfaction, and more ethical care.
What Are Patient Preferences?
Patient preferences encompass the values, beliefs, and choices individuals bring to their healthcare experience. These may include:
- Preferred treatment modalities
- Cultural or religious considerations
- Communication styles
- Lifestyle factors
According to Dovetail, preferences are shaped by personal experiences, health beliefs, and expectations.
Why Patient Preferences Matter
Ignoring patient preferences can result in:
- Poor adherence to treatment
- Increased healthcare costs
- Lower satisfaction
Conversely, incorporating preferences leads to:
- Enhanced engagement
- Better clinical outcomes
- Stronger patient-provider trust
A study by CipherHealth found that personalized care improves adherence and reduces readmissions.
Shared Decision-Making: The Cornerstone
Shared decision-making (SDM) is a collaborative process where clinicians and patients make health decisions together. It involves:
- Presenting options
- Discussing risks and benefits
- Aligning with patient values
The BMJ describes SDM as essential for ethical and effective care.
Cultural and Socioeconomic Considerations
Culture influences diet, beliefs about illness, and attitudes toward medication. For example:
- Traditional diets may conflict with diabetic meal plans
- Language barriers can hinder understanding
Ethnic Group | Diabetes Prevalence (%) |
---|---|
American Indian/Alaska Native | 14.5 |
Black (non-Hispanic) | 12.1 |
Hispanic | 11.8 |
White (non-Hispanic) | 7.4 |
Source: Orgain Healthcare
Real-World Case Study
Scenario: A patient with type 2 diabetes expressed frustration with dietary restrictions. By modifying the plan to include culturally familiar foods and adding counseling, adherence improved and glucose levels stabilized.
This aligns with findings from AHRQ, which emphasize the value of patient-centered decision support tools.
Benefit | Impact |
Improved glycemic control | Lower HbA1c levels |
Higher satisfaction scores | Better patient experience ratings |
Reduced hospital readmissions | Lower healthcare costs |
Source: PREFER Framework
Challenges and Barriers
Common barriers include:
- Time constraints during consultations
- Provider bias
- Limited reimbursement for SDM
- Patients’ reluctance to participate
The Diabetes Spectrum suggests reframing cultural barriers as opportunities for innovation.
Strategies for Implementation
To effectively incorporate preferences:
- Use surveys and interviews
- Establish patient advisory councils
- Train staff in cultural humility
- Integrate decision aids
Tools like PC CDS (Patient-Centered Clinical Decision Support) help collect and apply preference data.
Technology Supporting Patient-Centered Care
Digital platforms can:
- Capture preferences pre-visit
- Offer multilingual resources
- Track adherence and feedback
Examples include:
- Mobile apps for diabetes tracking
- AI-powered chatbots for education
- EHR-integrated decision support tools
Policy and Ethical Considerations
Ethical care requires respecting autonomy and informed consent. Policies should:
- Support SDM reimbursement
- Promote transparency
- Protect patient data
The PREFER framework offers guidelines for integrating preferences into pharmaceutical decision-making.
Conclusion
Incorporating patient preferences is not just good practice—it’s a moral and clinical imperative. By embracing shared decision-making, cultural sensitivity, and personalized care, providers can deliver treatment plans that truly resonate with patients.
Rubric Detail
Novice | Competent | Proficient | New Column4 | |||
Main Posting | 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
||
Main Post: Timeliness | 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3. |
||
First Response | 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
||
Second Response | 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
||
Participation | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. |
||
Total Points: 100 | ||||||
Name: NURS_6052_Module05_Week08_Discussion_Rubric