Submit a summary of six of your articles on the discussion board. Discuss one strength and one weakness for each of these six articles on why the article may or may not provide sufficient evidence for your practice change

Last updated on May 27th, 2025 at 11:28 am

Submit a summary of six of your articles on the discussion board. Discuss one strength and one weakness for each of these six articles on why the article may or may not provide sufficient evidence for your practice change

Submit a summary of six of your articles on the discussion board. Discuss one strength and one weakness for each of these six articles on why the article may or may not provide sufficient evidence for your practice change

Topic 3 DQ 1

Submit a summary of six of your articles on the discussion board. Discuss one strength and one weakness for each of these six articles on why the article may or may not provide sufficient evidence for your practice change.

Topic 3 DQ 2

Name two different methods for evaluating evidence. Compare and contrast these two methods.

Topic 3 DQ 1: Expert Answer and Explanation

Summary of Six Articles

The review by Dugani et al. (2018) found that various healthcare facilities in low and middle-income countries report high rate of burnout. The strength of this study is that the authors clearly showed the inclusion and exclusion criteria. However, few articles were used as the sample of the study making it hard to generalize findings.

The strength of the paper by Griffiths et al. (2016) is that it has clearly highlighted what is know and what the paper aimed to achieve, and this can give the reader a clear picture of the focus of the paper. However, the weakness of the paper is that it experienced some level of bias with estimates from personal studies. Gyllensten, et al. (2017)’s strength is that the semi-structured data collection method allowed them to gather a lot of information. However, the weakness of the paper is that it had lower response rate of about 10%.

The strength of Hart et al. (2018)’s study was that the authors used credible and reliable databases to extract articles for review. Also, the authors explained how they excluded and included articles so well. However, the researchers had problem with originality of the study. The strength of the article by Kurnat-Thoma et al. (2017) is that they used sophisticated method to collect data and also, the data gathered was correct and accurate. However, some elements of biasness were detected in the study, and this affected findings.

Lastly, the strength of the article by Souders et al. (2017) is that data analysis showed that the results were statistically significant. However, the researchers had limited time and resources to make the study larger and more accurate.

References

Dugani, S., Afari, H., Hirschhorn, L. R., Ratcliffe, H., Veillard, J., Martin, G., … & Bitton, A. (2018). Prevalence and factors associated with burnout among frontline primary health care providers in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Gates open research, 2. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.12779.2

Griffiths, P., Ball, J., Drennan, J., Dall’Ora, C., Jones, J., Maruotti, A., … & Simon, M. (2016). Nurse staffing and patient outcomes: Strengths and limitations of the evidence to inform policy and practice. A review and discussion paper based on evidence reviewed for the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Safe Staffing guideline development. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 63, 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.03.012

Gyllensten, K., Andersson, G., & Muller, H. (2017). Experiences of reduced work hours for nurses and assistant nurses at a surgical department: a qualitative study. BMC nursing, 16(1), 16. https://bmcnurs.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12912-017-0210-x

Hart, T., Samways, J. W., Kukendrarajah, K., Keenan, M., & Chaudhri, S. (2018). Improving out-of-hours surgical patient care. International journal of health care quality assurance. Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJHCQA-08-2017-0148

Kurnat-Thoma, E., Ganger, M., Peterson, K., & Channell, L. (2017). Reducing annual hospital and registered nurse staff turnover—A 10-element onboarding program intervention. SAGE Open Nursing, 3, 2377960817697712. DOI: 10.1177/2377960817697712

Souders, C. P., Catchpole, K. R., Wood, L. N., Solnik, J. M., Avenido, R. M., Strauss, P. L., … & Anger, J. T. (2017). Reducing operating room turnover time for robotic surgery using a motor racing pit stop model. World journal of surgery, 41(8), 1943-1949. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00268-017-3936-4

Suppose you have been tasked with purchasing health insurance for your organization that has fifty (50) full-time employees.

Topic 3 DQ 2: Expert Answer and Explanation

Evaluation Methods

There are many approaches researchers can use to evaluate evidence. However, researchers should select the best methods that can work for them. That said, the key approaches that will be used to analyze evidence in this project are interviews and surveys. According to J. Phillips and P. Phillips (2016), survey is an evidence evaluation method where one is allowed to use series of questionnaires to gather information about the evidence. Through surveys, researchers are at liberty to use the open-ended or free-response inquiries to gather data.

Apart from questionnaires, researchers can also use checklists as instruments to collect information about the evidence being evaluated. Järvelin and Kekäläinen (2017) define interview as the approach that can allow the evaluator to structure questions in a way that provides the interviewees the environment to respond to the questions freely. Interviews require that the structured or semi-structured questions are responded to in a documented form.

The following are the differences between the approaches. Järvelin and Kekäläinen (2017) report that through survey, researchers can cover many topics at a time while interviews can hinder the scholar from collecting much data because it takes a lot of time. Another significant difference is that surveys are conducted through instruments, such as checklists and questionnaires.

However, interviews require that the researcher meets the participants fac-to-face. Though the two approaches are different, they are similar in the following ways. First, they can be used to evaluate the objectives, goals, and the findings of evidences. Second, the two methods can provide the researchers with opportunity to create a relationship with their respondents. Lastly, data collected using the two methods are easy to analyze.

References

Phillips, J. J., & Phillips, P. P. (2016). Handbook of training evaluation and measurement methods. Routledge.

Järvelin, K., & Kekäläinen, J. (2017, August). IR evaluation methods for retrieving highly relevant documents. In ACM SIGIR Forum (Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 243-250). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3130348.3130374

Place your order now on the similar assignment and get fast, cheap and best quality work written from scratch by our expert level  assignment writers.

Submit a summary of six of your articles on the discussion board. Discuss one strength and one weakness for each of these six articles on why the article may or may not provide sufficient evidence for your practice change

Other Solved Questions:

SOLVED! How would your communication and interview

SOLVED! Describe the difference between a nursing practice

SOLVED! Discuss how elimination complexities can affect

SOLVED! Case C 38-year-old Native American pregnant

ANSWERED! In a 1,000–1,250 word essay, summarize two

[ANSWERED] Students will develop a 1,250-1,500 word paper that includes

[ANSWERED] Post a description of the national healthcare

ANSWERED!! Explain how you would inform this nurse

ANSWERED!! In a 4- to 5-page project proposal written to the

ANSWERED!! A 15-year-old male reports dull pain in both

ANSWERED!! Should government continue to take an

[ANSWERED] Mrs. Adams a 68-year-old widow who was

[ANSWERED] Compare and contrast the various ways you can

ANSWERED! Provide a summary of your learning style

Quote

QUICK QUOTE

Approximately 250 words

USD $10.99

custom essy

Order an essay from experts and get an A+

  • NursingAcademic Research Bureau

    I am very happy to receive the help from you, my assignment was graded an A. Thank you!

  • NursingAcademic Research Bureau

    Absolutely a remarkable job and great work by an outstanding agency. I was well pleased with my assignment and got a great grade!

  • NursingAcademic Research Bureau

    Thanks for the quick resolution of my assignment issue i really appreciate that :)

  • ManagementAcademic Research Bureau

    Great assignment, i asked to add few more things after I received the first draft and it was done very well

  • EconomicsAcademic Research Bureau

    I have got what was described and very happy with the overall service and result!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • NursingAcademic Research Bureau

    Prompt on time and did a great job with promptness and getting the assignment back on time

  • NursingProfessional assignment help services

    great turnaround time. neat writing and reasearch. still awaiting marks in a month

  • ManagementAcademic Research Bureau

    hank you academicresearchbureau.com for giving me a amazing service when I was stuck with my assignment

  • EducationAcademic Research Bureau

    Thanks for the experts helping me with the assignment. Satisfied with the Service.

     

  • NursingAcademic Research Bureau

    Super quality work on time. Thank you for helping me with the assignment. Will recommend for others.

  • EconomicsAcademic Research Bureau

    I am happy and satisfied with their professional assignment help service. The team at academicresearchbureau.com was quite nice and supportive.

  • NursingAcademic Research Bureau

    Satisfied with the great work on time. Would recommend to anyone who need support for the assignments.

  • NursingAcademic Research Bureau

    Thank you academicresearchbureau.com for giving me a good quality service. Will recommend to all.

  • ManagementAcademic Research Bureau

    Got excellent help for my assignment and the work was delivered before deadline. Thank you academicresearchbureau.com

  • NursingProfessional assignment help services

    Good job. Will use expert again. Thank you for your help and time that I needed on this assignment.

  • NursingAcademic Research Bureau

    Nice work! Thanks for the revision. It meets the requirement now. I am very satisfied with the work.

  • LiteratureAcademic Research Bureau

    Well written with sheer creativity. Always on time. Well done. I surely will recommend.

  • ManagementAcademic Research Bureau

    Outstanding work. I will work with you again and again soon. I really appreciate your help; thank you so much.

  • ManagementAcademic Research Bureau

    Credit to the expert who did a great job with this assignment! Covered most of the requirements! Thank you!

  • NursingAcademic Research Bureau

    Solution was provided in a timely manner. Expert managed to meet my expectation. Have yet to receive my result yet

Copyright © 2024 AcademicResearchBureau.com. All rights reserved

Disclaimer: All the papers written by AcademicResearchBureau.com are to be used for reference purposes only.