[Solved] Using the Academic and Professional Success Development Template you began in Module 1, write a 2- to 3-paragraph analysis that includes the following:

Using the Academic and Professional Success Development Template you began in Module 1, write a 2- to 3-paragraph analysis that includes the following:

Using the Academic and Professional Success Development Template you began in Module 1, write a 2- to 3-paragraph analysis that includes the following:

Part 2, Section 1: Writing Sample: The Connection Between Academic and Professional Integrity

Using the Academic and Professional Success Development Template you began in Module 1, write a 2- to 3-paragraph analysis that includes the following:

  • Explanation for the relationship between academic integrity and writing
  • Explanation for the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics
  • Cite at least two resources that support your arguments, being sure to use proper APA formatting.
  • Use Grammarly and Turnitin to improve the product.
  • Explain how Grammarly, Turnitin, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity.

Part 2, Section 2: Strategies for Maintaining Integrity of Work

Expand on your thoughts from Section 1 by identifying and describing strategies you intend to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of your:

  1. academic work as a student of the MSN or PMC program and
  2. professional work as a nurse throughout your career. Include a review of resources and approaches you propose to use as a student and a professional.

Note: Add your work for this Assignment to the original document you began in the Module 1 Assignment, which was built from the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.

Expert Answer and Explanation

Relationship Between Academic Integrity and Writing

Writing is the main means by which students exhibit their knowledge, critical thinking, and originality.  Maintaining academic integrity guarantees that written work appropriately acknowledges the concepts and research of others while accurately reflecting one’s own expertise.  The learning process and the legitimacy of scholarly contributions are both compromised by plagiarism, falsification, and misrepresentation of material.

In addition to teaching students to respect ethical standards in professional situations, Sozon et al. (2024) assert that academic honesty in writing promotes trust between students, professors, and institutions.

Relationship Between Professional Practices And Scholarly Ethics

Scholarly ethics and professional practices are related because both need accountability, responsibility, and respect for knowledge based on evidence.  For example, the American Nurses Association (2025) has established professional codes of ethics that promote advocacy, honesty, and integrity, and nurses are expected to follow these codes.  Scholarly ethics also demand that students and researchers make sure their work is accurate, transparent, and fair.  The idea that maintaining trust with patients, coworkers, and the larger community is just as important as compliance is reaffirmed in both situations.

Academic Integrity – Grammarly, Turnitin, and Paraphrasing

Grammarly and Turnitin are two examples of tools that support academic integrity by encouraging writing that is accurate and unique.  Grammarly reduces the possibility of inadvertent mistakes that can jeopardize credibility by improving grammar, structure, and clarity (Sozon et al., 2025).  Conversely, Turnitin identifies similarities to public sources, enabling students to edit and correctly credit their work in order to prevent plagiarism.

Additionally, paraphrasing is important because it allows students to demonstrate their own understanding while integrating outside knowledge (Sozon et al., 2025).  When combined, these tactics guarantee that academic work upholds moral principles and equips students to act honorably in professional nursing jobs.

References

ANA. (2025). Code Of Ethics For Nurses With Interpretive Statements. American Nurses Association. https://codeofethics.ana.org/provisions

Sozon, M., Sia, B. C., Pok, W. F., & Alkharabsheh, O. H. M. (2024). Academic integrity violations in higher education: a systematic literature review from 2013–2023. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-12-2023-0559

NURS_6003_Module02_Week03_Assignment_Rubric
NURS_6003_Module02_Week03_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Part 2, Section 1: Using the Academic and Professional Success Development Template write a 2-3 paragraph analysis that includes the following:· Explanation for the relationship between academic integrity and writing. · Explanation for the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics. – Cite at least 2 resources that support your argument. · Use Grammarly and Turnitin to improve the product. Include sufficient evidence that these tools were utilized in explanation on how these tools contribute to academic integrity.
35 to >31.0 ptsExcellentThe response clearly and accurately explains the relationship between academic integrity and writing. … The response clearly and accurately explains the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics. … The response clearly and accurately describes how Grammarly, Turnitin, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity, including sufficient evidence that Grammarly and Turnitin were used to improve the responses provided.
31 to >27.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately explains the relationship between academic integrity and writing. … The response accurately explains the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics. … The response accurately describes how Grammarly, Turnitin, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity, including evidence that Grammarly and Turnitin were used to improve the responses provided.
27 to >24.0 ptsFairThe response vaguely explains the relationship between academic integrity and writing. … The response vaguely explains the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics. … The response vaguely describes how Grammarly, Turnitin, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity. The response includes insufficient evidence that Grammarly and Turnitin were used to improve the responses provided.
24 to >0 ptsPoorThe response vaguely and inaccurately explains the relationship between academic integrity and writing or is missing. The response vaguely and inaccurately explains the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics or is missing. … The response vaguely and inaccurately describes how Grammarly, Turnitin, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity. The response includes insufficient or no evidence that Grammarly and Turnitin were used to improve the responses provided or the response is missing.
35 pts
Part 2, Section 2: Strategies for Maintaining Integrity of Work. Identify and describe strategies you intend to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of your 1) academic work while a student of the MSN/PMC program, and 2) professional work as a nurse throughout your career. Include a review of resources and approaches you propose to use as a student and a professional.
55 to >49.0 ptsExcellentThe response clearly identifies and accurately describes strategies intended to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of academic work while in the MSN/PMC program and in professional work as a nurse. … The response clearly reviews and accurately proposes resources and approaches to use as a student and professional.
49 to >43.0 ptsGoodThe response identifies and describes strategies intended to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of academic work while in the MSN/PMC program and in professional work as a nurse. … The response reviews and proposes resources and approaches to use as a student and professional.
43 to >38.0 ptsFairThe response vaguely identifies and describes strategies intended to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of academic work while in the MSN/PMC program and in professional work as a nurse. … The response inaccurately reviews and/or vaguely proposes resources and approaches to use as a student and professional.
38 to >0 ptsPoorThe response about integrity and ethics strategies is vague and inaccurate or is missing. … The response about resources and approaches is vague and inaccurate or is missing.
55 pts
Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
4 to >3.0 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
3 to >2.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time.
2 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.
5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts

Quote

QUICK QUOTE

Approximately 250 words

USD $10.99

custom essy

Order an essay from experts and get an A+

Copyright © 2025 AcademicResearchBureau.com. All rights reserved

Disclaimer: All the papers written by AcademicResearchBureau.com are to be used for reference purposes only.