[ANSWERED 2023] Select a child or adolescent patient that you examined during the last 3 weeks who presented with a disorder for which you have not already created a Focused SOAP Note in Weeks 3 or 7

Select a child or adolescent patient that you examined during the last 3 weeks who presented with a disorder for which you have not already created a Focused SOAP Note in Weeks 3 or 7

Select a child or adolescent patient that you examined during the last 3 weeks who presented with a disorder for which you have not already created a Focused SOAP Note in Weeks 3 or 7

Assignment 2: Focused SOAP Note and Patient Case Presentation

For this Assignment, you will document information about a patient that you examined during the last 3 weeks, using the Focused SOAP Note Template provided. You will then use this note to develop and record a case presentation for this patient. Be sure to incorporate any feedback you received on your Week 3 and Week 7 case presentations into this final presentation for the course.

To Prepare

  • Review the Kaltura Media Uploader resource in the left-hand navigation of the classroom for help creating your self-recorded Kaltura video.
  • Select a child or adolescent patient that you examined during the last 3 weeks who presented with a disorder for which you have not already created a Focused SOAP Note in Weeks 3 or 7. (For instance, if you selected a patient with anorexia nervosa in Week 7, you must choose a patient with another type of disorder for this week.)
  • Create a Focused SOAP Note on this patient using the template provided in the Learning Resources. There is also a completed Focused SOAP Note Exemplar provided to serve as a guide to assignment expectations.
    Please Note:

    • All SOAP notes must be signed, and each page must be initialed by your Preceptor. Note: Electronic signatures are not accepted.
    • When you submit your note, you should include the complete focused SOAP note as a Word document and PDF/images of each page that is initialed and signed by your Preceptor.
    • You must submit your SOAP note using SafeAssign. Note: If both files are not received by the due date, faculty will deduct points per the Walden Grading Policy.
  • Then, based on your SOAP note of this patient, develop a video case study presentation. Take time to practice your presentation before you record.
  • Include at least five scholarly resources to support your assessment, diagnosis, and treatment planning.
  • Ensure that you have the appropriate lighting and equipment to record the presentation.

The Assignment

Record yourself presenting the complex case for your clinical patient.

Do not sit and read your written evaluation! The video portion of the assignment is a simulation to demonstrate your ability to succinctly and effectively present a complex case to a colleague for a case consultation. The written portion of this assignment is a simulation for you to demonstrate to the faculty your ability to document the complex case as you would in an electronic medical record.

The written portion of the assignment will be used as a guide for faculty to review your video to determine if you are omitting pertinent information or including non-essential information during your case staffing consultation video.

In your presentation:

  • Dress professionally and present yourself in a professional manner.
  • Display your photo ID at the start of the video when you introduce yourself.
  • Ensure that you do not include any information that violates the principles of HIPAA (i.e., don’t use the patient’s name or any other identifying information).
  • Present the full complex case study. Include chief complaint; history of present illness; any pertinent past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, family history; most recent mental status exam; current psychiatric diagnosis including differentials that were ruled out; and plan for treatment and management.
  • Report normal diagnostic results as the name of the test and “normal” (rather than specific value). Abnormal results should be reported as a specific value.
  • Be succinct in your presentation, and do not exceed 8 minutes. Specifically address the following for the patient, using your SOAP note as a guide:
    • Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life?
    • Objective: What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?
    • Assessment: Discuss their mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses and why you chose them. List them from highest priority to lowest priority. What was your primary diagnosis, and why? Describe how your primary diagnosis aligns with DSM-5 diagnostic criteria and supported by the patient’s symptoms.
    • Plan: In your video, describe your treatment plan using clinical practice guidelines supported by evidence-based practice. Include a discussion on your chosen FDA-approved psychopharmacologic agents and include alternative treatments available and supported by valid research. All treatment choices must have a discussion of your rationale for the choice supported by valid research. What were your follow-up plan and parameters? What referrals would you make or recommend as a result of this treatment session?
    • In your written plan include all the above as well as include one social determinant of health according to the HealthyPeople 2030 (you will need to research) as applied to this case in the realm of psychiatry and mental health. As a future advanced provider, what are one health promotion activity and one patient education consideration for this patient for improving health disparities and inequities in the realm of psychiatry and mental health? Demonstrate your critical thinking.
    • Reflection notes: What would you do differently with this patient if you could conduct the session over? If you are able to follow up with your patient, explain whether these interventions were successful and why or why not. If you were not able to conduct a follow up, discuss what your next intervention would be.
 ExcellentGoodFairPoor
Photo ID display and professional attire5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Photo ID is displayed. The student is dressed professionally.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)0 (0%) – 0 (0%)0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Photo ID is not displayed. Student must remedy this before grade is posted. The student is not dressed professionally.

Time5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

The video does not exceed the 8-minute time limit.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)0 (0%) – 0 (0%)0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

The video exceeds the 8-minute time limit. (Note: Information presented after 8 minutes will not be evaluated for grade inclusion.)

Discuss Subjective data:

• Chief complaint

• History of present illness (HPI)

• Medications

• Psychotherapy or previous
psychiatric diagnosis

• Pertinent histories and/or ROS

9 (9%) – 10 (10%)

The video accurately and concisely presents the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, and pertinent histories and/or review of systems that would inform a differential diagnosis.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

The video accurately presents the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, and pertinent histories and/or review of systems that would inform a differential diagnosis.

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

The video presents the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, and pertinent histories and/or review of systems that would inform a differential diagnosis, but is somewhat vague or contains minor inaccuracies.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

The video presents an incomplete, inaccurate, or unnecessarily detailed/verbose description of the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, and pertinent histories and/or review of systems that would inform a differential diagnosis. Or subjective documentation is missing.

Discuss Objective data:

• Physical exam documentation of systems pertinent to the chief complaint, HPI, and history

• Diagnostic results, including any labs, imaging, or other assessments needed to develop the differential diagnoses

9 (9%) – 10 (10%)

The video accurately and concisely documents the patient’s physical exam for pertinent systems. Pertinent diagnostic tests and their results are documented, as applicable.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

The response accurately documents the patient’s physical exam for pertinent systems. Diagnostic tests and their results are documented, as applicable.

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Documentation of the patient’s physical exam is somewhat vague or contains minor inaccuracies. Diagnostic tests and their results are documented but contain inaccuracies.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

The response provides incomplete, inaccurate, or unnecessarily detailed/verbose documentation of the patient’s physical exam. Systems may have been unnecessarily reviewed, or objective documentation is missing.

Discuss results of Assessment:

• Results of the mental status examination

• Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses in order of highest to lowest priority and explain why you chose them. What was your primary diagnosis and why? Describe how your primary diagnosis aligns with DSM-5 diagnostic criteria and is supported by the patient’s symptoms.

18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

The video accurately documents the results of the mental status exam.

Video presents at least three differentials in order of priority for a differential diagnosis of the patient, and a rationale for their selection. Response justifies the primary diagnosis and how it aligns with DSM-5 criteria.

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

The video adequately documents the results of the mental status exam.

Video presents three differentials for the patient and a rationale for their selection. Response adequately justifies the primary diagnosis and how it aligns with DSM-5 criteria.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The video presents the results of the mental status exam, with some vagueness or inaccuracy.

Video presents three differentials for the patient and a rationale for their selection. Response somewhat vaguely justifies the primary diagnosis and how it aligns with DSM-5 criteria.

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

The response provides an incomplete, inaccurate, or unnecessarily detailed/verbose description of the results of the mental status exam and explanation of the differential diagnoses. Or assessment documentation is missing.

Discuss treatment Plan:

• A treatment plan for the patient that addresses psychotherapy; one health promotion activity and one patient education strategy; plan for treatment and management, including alternative therapies; pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters; and a rationale for the approaches selected.

18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

The video clearly and concisely outlines an evidence-based treatment plan for the patient that addresses psychotherapy, health promotion and patient education, treatment and management, pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters. A clear and concise rationale for the treatment approaches recommended is provided.

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

The video clearly outlines an appropriate treatment plan for the patient that addresses psychotherapy, health promotion and patient education, treatment and management, pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters. A clear rationale for the treatment approaches recommended is provided.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately outlines a treatment plan for the patient and provides a rationale for the treatment approaches recommended.

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

The response does not address the diagnosis or is missing elements of the treatment plan.

Reflect on this case. Discuss what you learned and what you might do differently.5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Reflections are thorough, thoughtful, and demonstrate critical thinking.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Reflections demonstrate critical thinking.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Reflections are somewhat general or do not demonstrate critical thinking.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Reflections are incomplete, inaccurate, or missing.

Focused SOAP Note documentation18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

The response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly follows the Focused SOAP Note format to document the selected patient case.

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

The response accurately follows the Focused SOAP Note format to document the selected patient case.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The response follows the Focused SOAP Note format to document the selected patient case, with some vagueness and inaccuracy.

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

The response incompletely and inaccurately follows the Focused SOAP Note format to document the selected patient case.

Presentation style5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Presentation style is exceptionally clear, professional, and focused.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Presentation style is clear, professional, and focused.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Presentation style is mostly clear, professional, and focused

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Presentation style is unclear, unprofessional, and/or unfocused.

Total Points: 100

Name: PRAC_6665_Week9_Assignment2_Rubric

Expert Answer and Explanation

Substance Abuse Disorder

Subjective:

CC: “temper tantrums in the home”

HPI: RM is an 8-year-old Caucasian female brought to the clinic with a CC of “temper tantrums in the home.” The patient’s parents note that the behavior often begins when they try to instruct her on what she is doing. The parents indicate the problem starts when they want to transition her from playing with her toys to coming to the dinner table, or during bedtime, bath time, and when getting dressed in the morning.

During the bouts, the patient becomes enraged and augmentative, refusing to follow rules or follow instructions and at times defiantly does thig to annoy the parents.

Substance Current Use and History: The patient and the parents deny a history of substance use or abuse. The patient denies having ever taken alcohol or any other illicit substances.

Family Psychiatric/Substance Use History: The patient’s parents deny any use of substances, alcohol, or cigarettes. Mother was diagnosed with acute anxiety, which is well managed.

Psychosocial History: The patient lives with his parents. The parents state that she has no history of mental illness. They also indicate the patient has not been performing well in school and usually engages in fights with other kids which has made her teachers worried. The patient enjoys playing with her toys and watching cartoons during her free time.

Medical History: The patient is healthy with no diagnosis of any physical health condition

  • Current Medications: Not under any medications
  • Allergies: not allergic to food, medication, or environmental substances.
  • Reproductive Hx: No abnormalities stated

ROS:

  • GENERAL: Negative for fatigue, fever, or chills.
  • HEENT: No abnormalities stated
  • SKIN: No rashes, wounds, or itchiness stated
  • CARDIOVASCULAR: Denies having any chest pain or discomfort
  • RESPIRATORY: No coughs or difficulty in breathing
  • GASTROINTESTINAL: Negative affirmation for any GI abnormalities and pain
  • GENITOURINARY: Negative for GU symptoms
  • NEUROLOGICAL: No headaches or neurological pain
  • MUSCULOSKELETAL: No MS issues stated.
  • HEMATOLOGIC: Negative for hematologic issues.
  • LYMPHATICS: Negative lymphadenopathy.
  • ENDOCRINOLOGIC: Negative for any endocrine symptoms.

Objective:

Physical exam: GENERAL:

Vital Signs: T- 97.2 P- 62 R 14 BP 95/60 Ht. 4’4, Wt. 58lbs, R 14, BP 95/60

  • HEENT:
    • Head: No deformities or scars noted
    • Eyes: conjunctiva clear, White scleral, visual acuity 20/20.
    • Ears: Hearing intact.
    • Nose: Nasal mucosa moist and pink, nares are patent.
    • Throat: No swelling or pain when swallowing.
  • Skin: N/A
  • Cardiovascular: No murmurs. Normal HR and BP.
  • Respiratory: Lungs clear to auscultation
  • Gastrointestinal: N/A
  • Neurological: Cranial nerves intact.
  • Musculoskeletal: N/A

Assessment:

Mental Status Examination: The patient is an 8-years-old Caucasian female who appears appropriately developed for her age. She talks with a clear, logical, and coherent speech. She is oriented to time, event, person, and place. She is well-groomed and properly dressed for the occasion and weather.

No observable out-of-place mannerisms, tics, or gestures. She does not exhibit or indicate any signs or symptoms of paranoia, hallucination, or delusions and her attention and concertation are grossly intact. She also denies having any suicidal ideations. Her insight and judgment are appropriate for her age.

Differential Diagnoses: 

F91.3 – Oppositional defiant disorder.

F 90.9 – Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, unspecified type.

F34. 8 – Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder

Primary Diagnosis 

The primary diagnosis for the presented disorder is oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). According to the DSM-V criteria, this is a disorder characterized by emotional and behavioral symptoms lasting for at least six months (APA, 2013).

In addition, the patient should be experiencing angry and easily irritable moods, where the patient easily gets annoyed, loses temper, and feels resentment and anger. In addition, the patient may have augmentative and defiant behavior coupled with vindictiveness (APA, 2013).

Plan:

In most cases, pharmacologic interventions are not needed for patients with ODD, unless they have another comorbid mental disorder such as ADHD (Aggarwal & Marwaha, 2020). Instead, family-based therapy is preferred in such patients. Some of the effective psychotherapeutic approaches include parental, training, family-based therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and individual therapy to list a few.

For this particular patient, she was started with methylphenidate (Ritalin) 10mg daily and will f/u in 2 weeks to regulate symptoms of hyperactivity. The parents were referred to a therapist for CBT and a parenting program. As part of the patient education, parents were advised to set limits by giving clear instructions and consequences in advance if the instructions are not followed. The parents were also told to embrace a system of rewarding good behavior to act as reinforcers to positive behavior (Booker et al., 2019).

Reflections: 

In most cases, treatment for oppositional defiant disorder requires significant elements of family-based interventions. One element I would consider is trying to probe more into what works for the parents in trying to manage the patient’s temper tantrums. I would expect the interventions to show some signs of success after the first month or so. Based on the study by Ghosh et al. (2017), family-based therapy has been proven efficacious among children with ODD, showing results from one month onwards after initiating the intervention.

Some of the gains from the intervention include, reduced frequency of the aggressive bouts, increased compliance to directions, and more rational actions when aggravated. Another way to ascertain whether the intervention was successful is by evaluating the parent’s mental state, whereby, in the event of successful treatment they should experience fewer poor mental health outcomes if the study by Katzmann et al. (2021) is anything to go by.

Depending on how the patient responds to the intervention, I may opt to recommend some adjustments to the treatment regimen and possible further diagnosis of other likely associated disorders.

References

Aggarwal, A., & Marwaha, R. (2020). Oppositional Defiant Disorder. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (Vol 5). (2013). American psychiatric association.

Booker, J. A., Capriola-Hall, N. N., Greene, R. W., & Ollendick, T. H. (2019). The parent-child relationship and posttreatment child outcomes across two treatments for oppositional defiant disorder. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology.

Ghosh, A., Ray, A., & Basu, A. (2017). Oppositional defiant disorder: current insight. Psychology research and behavior management10, 353–367. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S120582

Katzmann, J., Döpfner, M., & Görtz-Dorten, A. (2018). Child-based treatment of oppositional defiant disorder: mediating effects on parental depression, anxiety, and stress. European child & adolescent psychiatry27(9), 1181-1192.

Alternative Answer and Explanation

Substance Abuse Disorder

Subjective:

CC: “temper tantrums in the home”

HPI: RM is an 8-year-old Caucasian female brought to the clinic with a CC of “temper tantrums in the home.” The patient’s parents note that the behavior often begins when they try to instruct her on what she is doing. The parents indicate the problem starts when they want to transition her from playing with her toys to coming to the dinner table, or during bedtime, bath time, and when getting dressed in the morning. During the bouts, the patient becomes enraged and augmentative, refusing to follow rules or follow instructions and at times defiantly does thig to annoy the parents.

Substance Current Use and History: The patient and the parents deny a history of substance use or abuse. The patient denies having ever taken alcohol or any other illicit substances.

Family Psychiatric/Substance Use History: The patient’s parents deny any use of substances, alcohol, or cigarettes. Mother was diagnosed with acute anxiety, which is well managed.

Psychosocial History: The patient lives with his parents. The parents state that she has no history of mental illness. They also indicate the patient has not been performing well in school and usually engages in fights with other kids which has made her teachers worried. The patient enjoys playing with her toys and watching cartoons during her free time.

Medical History: The patient is healthy with no diagnosis of any physical health condition

  • Current Medications: Not under any medications
  • Allergies:not allergic to food, medication, or environmental substances.
  • Reproductive Hx:No abnormalities stated

ROS:

  • GENERAL: Negative for fatigue, fever, or chills.
  • HEENT: No abnormalities stated
  • SKIN: No rashes, wounds, or itchiness stated
  • CARDIOVASCULAR: Denies having any chest pain or discomfort
  • RESPIRATORY: No coughs or difficulty in breathing
  • GASTROINTESTINAL: Negative affirmation for any GI abnormalities and pain
  • GENITOURINARY: Negative for GU symptoms
  • NEUROLOGICAL: No headaches or neurological pain
  • MUSCULOSKELETAL: No MS issues stated.
  • HEMATOLOGIC: Negative for hematologic issues.
  • LYMPHATICS: Negative lymphadenopathy.
  • ENDOCRINOLOGIC: Negative for any endocrine symptoms.

Objective:

Physical exam: GENERAL:

Vital Signs: T- 97.2 P- 62 R 14 BP 95/60 Ht. 4’4, Wt. 58lbs, R 14, BP 95/60

  • HEENT:
    • Head: No deformities or scars noted
    • Eyes: conjunctiva clear, White scleral, visual acuity 20/20.
    • Ears: Hearing intact.
    • Nose: Nasal mucosa moist and pink, nares are patent.
    • Throat: No swelling or pain when swallowing.
  • Skin: N/A
  • Cardiovascular: No murmurs. Normal HR and BP.
  • Respiratory: Lungs clear to auscultation
  • Gastrointestinal: N/A
  • Neurological: Cranial nerves intact.
  • Musculoskeletal: N/A

Assessment:

Mental Status Examination: The patient is an 8-years-old Caucasian female who appears appropriately developed for her age. She talks with a clear, logical, and coherent speech. She is oriented to time, event, person, and place. She is well-groomed and properly dressed for the occasion and weather.

No observable out-of-place mannerisms, tics, or gestures. She does not exhibit or indicate any signs or symptoms of paranoia, hallucination, or delusions and her attention and concertation are grossly intact. She also denies having any suicidal ideations. Her insight and judgment are appropriate for her age.

Differential Diagnoses: 

F91.3 – Oppositional defiant disorder.

F 90.9 – Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, unspecified type.

F34. 8 – Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder

Primary Diagnosis 

The primary diagnosis for the presented disorder is oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). According to the DSM-V criteria, this is a disorder characterized by emotional and behavioral symptoms lasting for at least six months (APA, 2013).In addition, the patient should be experiencing angry and easily irritable moods, where the patient easily gets annoyed, loses temper, and feels resentment and anger. In addition, the patient may have augmentative and defiant behavior coupled with vindictiveness (APA, 2013).

Plan:

In most cases, pharmacologic interventions are not needed for patients with ODD, unless they have another comorbid mental disorder such as ADHD (Aggarwal & Marwaha, 2020). Instead, family-based therapy is preferred in such patients. Some of the effective psychotherapeutic approaches include parental, training, family-based therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and individual therapy to list a few.

For this particular patient, she was started with methylphenidate (Ritalin) 10mg daily and will f/u in 2 weeks to regulate symptoms of hyperactivity. The parents were referred to a therapist for CBT and a parenting program. As part of the patient education, parents were advised to set limits by giving clear instructions and consequences in advance if the instructions are not followed. The parents were also told to embrace a system of rewarding good behavior to act as reinforcers to positive behavior (Booker et al., 2019).

Reflections: 

In most cases, treatment for oppositional defiant disorder requires significant elements of family-based interventions. One element I would consider is trying to probe more into what works for the parents in trying to manage the patient’s temper tantrums. I would expect the interventions to show some signs of success after the first month or so.

Based on the study by Ghosh et al. (2017), family-based therapy has been proven efficacious among children with ODD, showing results from one month onwards after initiating the intervention. Some of the gains from the intervention include, reduced frequency of the aggressive bouts, increased compliance to directions, and more rational actions when aggravated.

Another way to ascertain whether the intervention was successful is by evaluating the parent’s mental state, whereby, in the event of successful treatment they should experience fewer poor mental health outcomes if the study by Katzmann et al. (2021) is anything to go by. Depending on how the patient responds to the intervention, I may opt to recommend some adjustments to the treatment regimen and possible further diagnosis of other likely associated disorders.

References

Aggarwal, A., & Marwaha, R. (2020). Oppositional Defiant Disorder. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (Vol 5). (2013). American psychiatric association.

Booker, J. A., Capriola-Hall, N. N., Greene, R. W., & Ollendick, T. H. (2019). The parent-child relationship and posttreatment child outcomes across two treatments for oppositional defiant disorder. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology.

Ghosh, A., Ray, A., & Basu, A. (2017). Oppositional defiant disorder: current insight. Psychology research and behavior management10, 353–367. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S120582

Katzmann, J., Döpfner, M., & Görtz-Dorten, A. (2018). Child-based treatment of oppositional defiant disorder: mediating effects on parental depression, anxiety, and stress. European child & adolescent psychiatry27(9), 1181-1192.

Place your order now for a similar assignment and get fast, cheap and best quality work written by our expert level  assignment writers.Select a child or adolescent patient that you examined during the last 3 weeks who presented with a disorder for which you have not already created a Focused SOAP Note in Weeks 3 or 7Use Coupon Code: NEW30 to Get 30% OFF Your First Order

Solved Questions:

SOLVED! How would your communication and interview

SOLVED! Describe the difference between a nursing practice

SOLVED! How do you think evidence from nursing journals

SOLVED! Discuss how elimination complexities can affect

SOLVED! Case C 38-year-old Native American pregnant

ANSWERED! In a 1,000–1,250 word essay, summarize two

[ANSWERED] Students will develop a 1,250-1,500 word paper that includes

[ANSWERED] Post a description of the national healthcare

ANSWERED!! Explain how you would inform this nurse

ANSWERED!! In a 4- to 5-page project proposal written to the

ANSWERED!! A 15-year-old male reports dull pain in both

ANSWERED!! Should government continue to take an

[ANSWERED] Mrs. Adams a 68-year-old widow who was

[ANSWERED] Compare and contrast the various ways you can

ANSWERED! Provide a summary of your learning style

what is a soap note, soap nursing, soap notes template, soap notes meaning, soap notes examples, soap notes assessment example, soap notes, soap note nursing, soap note meaning, soap note in nursing

Quote

QUICK QUOTE

Approximately 250 words

USD $10.99

custom essy

Order an essay from experts and get an A+

Copyright © 2024 AcademicResearchBureau.com. All rights reserved

Disclaimer: All the papers written by AcademicResearchBureau.com are to be used for reference purposes only.