For this assignment you will use the information from your implementation plan to complete the third phase of the public health project
For this assignment you will use the information from your implementation plan to complete the third phase of the public health project: development of an evaluation and stakeholder engagement plan. In a narrative of 750-1,000 words, include each of the following in your plan:
- Description of the type of evaluation you will conduct.
- List of evaluation questions to direct your evaluation.
- Refer to the findings of your evaluation design comparison for selecting your evaluation design. Describe the evaluation design you selected for your program/intervention. Provide a rationale as to why this design is best for the evaluation of your intervention.
- Describe evaluation methods. Identify and describe quantitative and/or qualitative data collection methods you will use to evaluate your program/intervention.
- Describe strategies for identifying stakeholders and disseminating findings to stakeholders. What communication strategies will you use to share this information with stakeholders? Consider what ways you could include the community in the feedback loop to ensure culturally responsive dissemination of results.
- Imagine you are being asked by community members how this program will continue after grant funds have ended. Describe at least one strategy you can implement to sustain this intervention. Discuss how you can engage in collaboration and partnerships to sustain your program for improved outcomes for the health issue.
You are required to cite to three to five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and public health content.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Benchmark Information
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:
MPH
3.5: Select methods to evaluate public health programs.
4.2: Propose strategies to identify stakeholders and build coalitions and partnerships for influencing public health outcomes.
Q & A
Q1: What is the main task described in this assignment?
A1: You are required to use your implementation plan (from the earlier phase of your public health project) to complete Phase 3: the development of an evaluation and stakeholder-engagement plan. Academic Research Bureau
Q2: What is the expected length of the narrative for this assignment?
A2: You should write a narrative of 750–1,000 words. Academic Research Bureau
Q3: What key elements must be included in your evaluation and stakeholder engagement plan?
A3: Your plan should include (at least) the following elements:
-
A description of the type of evaluation you will conduct. Academic Research Bureau
-
A list of evaluation questions to guide your evaluation. Academic Research Bureau
-
A description of the evaluation design you selected (referring to your prior evaluation design comparison) and a rationale for why this design is best for your intervention. Academic Research Bureau
-
A description of evaluation methods—identify and describe quantitative and/or qualitative data‐collection methods you plan to use. Academic Research Bureau
-
A description of strategies for identifying stakeholders and disseminating findings, including communication techniques and ways to include the community in the feedback loop to ensure culturally responsive dissemination of results. Academic Research Bureau
-
A sustainability strategy: imagine you are asked by community members how the program will continue after grant funds end; describe at least one strategy for sustaining the intervention, and how you can engage collaborations/partnerships to sustain improved outcomes. Academic Research Bureau
Q4: What citation requirements are specified for the sources in this assignment?
A4: You are required to cite three to five sources, and those sources must have been published within the last five years and must be appropriate for public health content and the assignment criteria. Academic Research Bureau
Q5: What formatting and submission requirements are mentioned?
A5: The assignment must be prepared in accordance with the APA Style Guide (available via the Student Success Center). You are required to submit the assignment through LopesWrite (a plagiarism‐detection/feedback tool). Academic Research Bureau
Q6: Which programmatic competencies does this assignment assess?
A6: This assignment assesses the following competencies within the MPH/ public health program:
-
Competency 3.5: Select methods to evaluate public health programs. Academic Research Bureau
-
Competency 4.2: Propose strategies to identify stakeholders and build coalitions and partnerships to influence public health outcomes. Academic Research Bureau
Q7: Why is the prior implementation plan important for this phase of the project?
A7: The prior implementation plan provides the foundation of what your intervention is, how it will be implemented, and sets up what you need to evaluate (and whom you need to engage). Using it ensures continuity from planning to evaluation and stakeholder involvement—ensuring that your evaluation is aligned with how you planned the intervention and how stakeholders were identified and engaged.
Q8: What is the purpose of including stakeholder engagement and community feedback in the plan?
A8: The stakeholder engagement and community feedback component is critical to ensure that your evaluation findings are not only disseminated appropriately but also are culturally responsive, inclusive, and actionable. Engaging stakeholders and community members helps enhance buy‐in, sustainability, ethical relevance, and ensures that dissemination and follow‐up adapt to the needs and context of the community you serve.
Q9: What does “sustainability” mean in the context of this assignment?
A9: In this context, sustainability refers to the ability of the intervention (or program) to continue operating or delivering benefits after initial grant funds or external funding ends. You need to propose at least one strategy for how to sustain the intervention, for instance through partnerships, community investment, institutionalization, or other collaborative arrangements.
Q10: How should you decide on which evaluation design to select?
A10: You should refer to your earlier evaluation‐design comparison (where you likely compared different designs) and then explain why you selected that design for your intervention. The rationale should explain how the chosen design best fits your program’s objectives, context, resources, data availability, timeline, and stakeholder/ethical considerations.
I am a professional nursing assignment expert offering comprehensive academic support to university nursing students across various institutions. My services are designed to help learners manage their workload effectively while maintaining academic excellence. With years of experience in nursing research, case study writing, and evidence-based reporting, I ensure every paper is original, well-researched, and aligned with current academic standards.
My goal is to provide dependable academic assistance that enables students to focus on practical training and career growth.
Contact me today to receive expert guidance and timely, high-quality nursing assignment help tailored to your academic needs.
